What strategies are used by clinician champions to reduce low-value care?

Low value clinician champion de-adoption de-implementation harmful implementation science medical reversal overtreatment overuse

Journal

SAGE open medicine
ISSN: 2050-3121
Titre abrégé: SAGE Open Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101624744

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 08 09 2021
accepted: 10 12 2021
entrez: 1 6 2022
pubmed: 2 6 2022
medline: 2 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Clinician champions are front-line clinicians who advocate for and influence practice change in their local context. The strategies they use when leading efforts to reduce the use of low-value care have not been well described. The purpose of this study is to identify and describe strategies used by six clinician champions who led a low-value care initiative in their clinical setting. Qualitative data collected during an overuse reduction initiative led by clinician champions were used to identify strategies, guided by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change compilation of strategies. Clinician champions were asked to rank the importance of these activities and indicate which one of the six most important activities they would be willing to discuss in an interview. A 30-min semi-structured interview was conducted with each clinician about the activity they selected and thematically analyzed. Twelve Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change strategies were identified. The top six strategies discussed during interviews were: build a coalition, conduct a local needs assessment, develop a formal implementation blueprint, conduct educational meetings, use facilitation, and develop clinical reminders. Common themes that emerged across all interviews were the use of data to engage clinicians in conversations, including the patient's perspective in designing the interventions, and investing the time upfront to plan and launch the initiative because of the inherent challenges of relinquishing a service. Clinician champions identified multiple strategies as important when de-implementing a low-value service. Many were used to engage in conversations with stakeholders, including leadership, providers, and patients, to increase buy-in and support, challenge beliefs, promote behavior change, and gather insights about next steps in their effort. Future work is needed to better understand how prepare clinicians for this role and to understand the mechanisms through which these strategies might be effective.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Clinician champions are front-line clinicians who advocate for and influence practice change in their local context. The strategies they use when leading efforts to reduce the use of low-value care have not been well described. The purpose of this study is to identify and describe strategies used by six clinician champions who led a low-value care initiative in their clinical setting.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Qualitative data collected during an overuse reduction initiative led by clinician champions were used to identify strategies, guided by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change compilation of strategies. Clinician champions were asked to rank the importance of these activities and indicate which one of the six most important activities they would be willing to discuss in an interview. A 30-min semi-structured interview was conducted with each clinician about the activity they selected and thematically analyzed.
Results UNASSIGNED
Twelve Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change strategies were identified. The top six strategies discussed during interviews were: build a coalition, conduct a local needs assessment, develop a formal implementation blueprint, conduct educational meetings, use facilitation, and develop clinical reminders. Common themes that emerged across all interviews were the use of data to engage clinicians in conversations, including the patient's perspective in designing the interventions, and investing the time upfront to plan and launch the initiative because of the inherent challenges of relinquishing a service.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Clinician champions identified multiple strategies as important when de-implementing a low-value service. Many were used to engage in conversations with stakeholders, including leadership, providers, and patients, to increase buy-in and support, challenge beliefs, promote behavior change, and gather insights about next steps in their effort. Future work is needed to better understand how prepare clinicians for this role and to understand the mechanisms through which these strategies might be effective.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35646351
doi: 10.1177/20503121211069855
pii: 10.1177_20503121211069855
pmc: PMC9133862
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

20503121211069855

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Apr 30;1:43
pubmed: 32885200
JAMA. 2021 May 4;325(17):1715-1716
pubmed: 33830184
Healthc (Amst). 2017 Dec;5(4):199-203
pubmed: 27840099
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1024-1058
pubmed: 34402553
Implement Sci. 2020 Jan 9;15(1):2
pubmed: 31915032
SAGE Open Med. 2018 May 17;6:2050312118773261
pubmed: 29796266
JAMA. 2016 Sep 20;316(11):1151-1152
pubmed: 27654598
SAGE Open Med. 2018 Aug 01;6:2050312118792426
pubmed: 30083320
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
JAMA. 2012 Apr 11;307(14):1513-6
pubmed: 22419800
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):198-205
pubmed: 29314508
Healthc Q. 2009;12 Spec No Patient:123-8
pubmed: 19667789
JAMA. 2015 Dec 8;314(22):2384-400
pubmed: 26647260
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913325
pubmed: 31617925
J Hosp Med. 2019 Feb;14(2):83-89
pubmed: 30785415
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):168-70
pubmed: 25804988
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 May;29(5):409-417
pubmed: 32029572
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Nov 1;177(11):1687-1689
pubmed: 29052711
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Dec;18(6):434-40
pubmed: 19955453
Implement Sci. 2020 Aug 6;15(1):62
pubmed: 32762726
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;167(3):215-216
pubmed: 28631001
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jun 15;16(1):48
pubmed: 29907158
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):973-983
pubmed: 32511668
Implement Sci. 2009 Mar 13;4:15
pubmed: 19284660
Qual Res Psychol. 2015 Apr 3;12(2):202-222
pubmed: 27499705
J Hosp Med. 2017 May;12(5):346-351
pubmed: 28459906
JAMA. 2018 May 15;319(19):1975-1976
pubmed: 29710232
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Oct;74(5):507-550
pubmed: 27402662
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):901-908
pubmed: 26700543
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):687-691
pubmed: 28600453
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1401-1407
pubmed: 30105371
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 10;37(2):93-96
pubmed: 30407894
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1115-1118
pubmed: 33999103
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 1;179(5):648-657
pubmed: 30907922

Auteurs

Michael L Parchman (ML)

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Lorella G Palazzo (LG)

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Jessica M Mogk (JM)

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Janna C Webbon (JC)

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Lauren Demosthenes (L)

University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC, USA.

Elizabeth Vossenkemper (E)

Tri-Cities Community Health, Pasco, WA, USA.

George Hoke (G)

University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Joshua Moskovitz (J)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Public Health, Hofstra School of Health and Human Services, New York, NY, USA.

Leslie Dunlap (L)

University of New Mexico Hospital, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Roberto Diaz Del Carpio (R)

CareMore Health, Cerritos, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH