Effect of Active and Passive Function of the Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff on Compensatory Muscle Loads in the Shoulder.

biomechanics irreparable massive rotator cuff tear

Journal

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2022
Historique:
received: 23 01 2022
accepted: 02 03 2022
entrez: 1 6 2022
pubmed: 2 6 2022
medline: 2 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff (PSRC) tears have been shown to result in shoulder pain and loss of function. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the loss of active or passive function of the PSRC on compensatory muscle loads in the deltoid and the remaining rotator cuff. It was hypothesized that both deactivation and resection of the PSRC would result in load increases in the remaining muscles and that resection of the PSRC would result in even higher required compensatory forces than would mere deactivation. Controlled laboratory study. A total of 7 cadaveric shoulders were tested using a biomechanical shoulder simulator with 10 independently controlled actuators for various muscles (anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid; inferior and superior subscapularis; latissimus dorsi; pectoralis major; teres minor; supraspinatus; and infraspinatus) and 3-dimensional motion tracking. The muscle loads representing the latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were each held constant, and the remaining muscle actuator forces required to abduct the arm in the scapular plane were determined. The actuator forces corresponding with arm elevation from 20° to 65° were compared at 5° increments for 3 testing conditions: (1) intact, active PSRC; (2) intact, deactivated PSRC; and (3) resected PSRC and shoulder capsule. In both the deactivated and resected states, the teres minor showed a significant increase in required muscle forces through nearly the entire tested range of arm elevation compared to the active state. This was also the case for the subscapularis but only at higher elevation angles. The deltoid demonstrated increased muscle forces of at least 1 of its subunits between 25° and 55° of elevation when comparing the deactivated state or resected state to the active state. However, through nearly the entire range of elevation, no statistically significant differences were found between the deactivated and resected states for any of the actuator loads representing muscle forces. The loss of active function of the PSRC led to compensatory loads on the remaining rotator cuff and deltoid, regardless of the passive presence of the PSRC as a supposed subacromial spacer. The findings encourage the exploration of treatment procedures that mimic the active function of the PSRC when the rotator cuff itself is irreparable.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff (PSRC) tears have been shown to result in shoulder pain and loss of function.
Purpose/Hypothesis UNASSIGNED
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the loss of active or passive function of the PSRC on compensatory muscle loads in the deltoid and the remaining rotator cuff. It was hypothesized that both deactivation and resection of the PSRC would result in load increases in the remaining muscles and that resection of the PSRC would result in even higher required compensatory forces than would mere deactivation.
Study Design UNASSIGNED
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A total of 7 cadaveric shoulders were tested using a biomechanical shoulder simulator with 10 independently controlled actuators for various muscles (anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid; inferior and superior subscapularis; latissimus dorsi; pectoralis major; teres minor; supraspinatus; and infraspinatus) and 3-dimensional motion tracking. The muscle loads representing the latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were each held constant, and the remaining muscle actuator forces required to abduct the arm in the scapular plane were determined. The actuator forces corresponding with arm elevation from 20° to 65° were compared at 5° increments for 3 testing conditions: (1) intact, active PSRC; (2) intact, deactivated PSRC; and (3) resected PSRC and shoulder capsule.
Results UNASSIGNED
In both the deactivated and resected states, the teres minor showed a significant increase in required muscle forces through nearly the entire tested range of arm elevation compared to the active state. This was also the case for the subscapularis but only at higher elevation angles. The deltoid demonstrated increased muscle forces of at least 1 of its subunits between 25° and 55° of elevation when comparing the deactivated state or resected state to the active state. However, through nearly the entire range of elevation, no statistically significant differences were found between the deactivated and resected states for any of the actuator loads representing muscle forces.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The loss of active function of the PSRC led to compensatory loads on the remaining rotator cuff and deltoid, regardless of the passive presence of the PSRC as a supposed subacromial spacer.
Clinical Relevance UNASSIGNED
The findings encourage the exploration of treatment procedures that mimic the active function of the PSRC when the rotator cuff itself is irreparable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35647209
doi: 10.1177/23259671221097062
pii: 10.1177_23259671221097062
pmc: PMC9134422
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

23259671221097062

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Specimens used in this study were donated by DePuy Synthes Mitek. P.M. has received consulting fees from Arthrex, DePuy Synthes Mitek, and NCS Lab. A.C. has received consulting and speaking fees from Arthrex, DePuy Synthes Mitek, Wright Medical, and Zimmer Biomet. S.M.G., M.Z.S., and D.B.S. are employees of DePuy Synthes Mitek Sports Medicine and stockholders of Johnson & Johnson. J.M.T. has received education payments from Elite Orthopaedics, Goode Surgical, and Impact Ortho; consulting fees from Arthrex, Medical Device Business Services, and Zimmer Biomet; and speaking fees from Arthrex. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Références

Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar;29(3):459-70
pubmed: 23369443
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2022 Feb;62:102335
pubmed: 31324511
J Exp Orthop. 2021 Jan 23;8(1):5
pubmed: 33484354
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Nov;(284):144-52
pubmed: 1395284
Arthrosc Tech. 2020 Mar 10;9(4):e459-e467
pubmed: 32368465
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):1511-8
pubmed: 18443279
Arthroscopy. 1993;9(6):611-6
pubmed: 8305096
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Aug 20;7(8):2325967119863432
pubmed: 31457066
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Jul;(232):51-61
pubmed: 3383502
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 6;95(21):1920-6
pubmed: 24196461
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 May-Jun;15(3):319-23
pubmed: 16679232
Arthroscopy. 2009 Aug;25(8):921-4
pubmed: 19664512
Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov;33(11):1949-1955
pubmed: 28866339
Arthroscopy. 1994 Aug;10(4):363-70
pubmed: 7945631
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Dec;73 Suppl 1:S21-7
pubmed: 26631191
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 May-Jun;15(3):331-8
pubmed: 16679234
Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Aug 29;5(5):e981-e988
pubmed: 27909664
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Sep;27(9):1545-1552
pubmed: 29980338
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Aug;25(8):1346-53
pubmed: 26968088
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2248-55
pubmed: 22886689
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018 Feb;52:41-48
pubmed: 29353150
Obere Extrem. 2017;12(1):38-45
pubmed: 28868086
Arthroscopy. 2020 Feb;36(2):365-366
pubmed: 32014170
J Orthop Res. 2006 Mar;24(3):491-500
pubmed: 16453345
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jul;28(7):1363-1370
pubmed: 30827834
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90(2):316-25
pubmed: 18245591
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Mar 18;97(6):462-9
pubmed: 25788302
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Mar;39(3):556-62
pubmed: 24559634
Arthroscopy. 2020 Apr;36(4):1011-1019
pubmed: 31953193
Arthroscopy. 2021 Feb;37(2):480-486
pubmed: 33068742
Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Nov 30;4(6):e751-5
pubmed: 27284506
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1423-30
pubmed: 26944572
Open Orthop J. 2017 Jul 25;11:546-553
pubmed: 28839499
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb;91(2):378-89
pubmed: 19181982
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1413-20
pubmed: 21460068
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998 Mar-Apr;7(2):100-8
pubmed: 9593086
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Feb;49(2):291-297
pubmed: 33253014
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013;71 Suppl 2:S25-30
pubmed: 24328576
Arthroscopy. 2012 Sep;28(9):1214-9
pubmed: 22608887
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jan;29(1):143-153
pubmed: 31894368
Bone Joint J. 2016 Feb;98-B(2):218-23
pubmed: 26850427
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):1919-1926
pubmed: 29741391

Auteurs

Philipp Moroder (P)

Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.

Aaron Chamberlain (A)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

Stefan M Gabriel (SM)

DePuy Synthes Mitek Sports Medicine, Raynham, Massachusetts, USA.

Marc C Jacofsky (MC)

Musculoskeletal Orthopedic Research and Education (MORE) Foundation, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Mehmet Z Sengun (MZ)

DePuy Synthes Mitek Sports Medicine, Raynham, Massachusetts, USA.

David B Spenciner (DB)

DePuy Synthes Mitek Sports Medicine, Raynham, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA.

John M Tokish (JM)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Lucca Lacheta (L)

Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Classifications MeSH