Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice of glaucoma among different cadres of optometrists.
Glaucoma
KAP
optometrist
optometry practice
optometry students
Journal
Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
entrez:
1
6
2022
pubmed:
2
6
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the level of knowledge, attitude, and clinical practice of glaucoma among optometry students and optometry practitioners with different years of clinical experience and academic background. A survey with 20 questions on knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of glaucoma was prepared and self-administered to optometry students and optometry practitioners practicing in an eye hospital/clinic/optical with varied years of clinical experience and education qualification. Among the 558 participants, 57% were optometry practitioners and 43% were students. The knowledge scores among optometry practitioners increased significantly with an increase in the years of clinical experience (P < 0.001). Participants with master's degrees scored higher than participants with bachelor's degrees (P = 0.12). There was no statistically significant difference in knowledge scores based on the type of clinical practice - hospital, private practice, or optical (P = 0.39). Practicing optometrists who performed slit-lamp examination, gonioscopy, IOP measurements, and disc evaluation for the detection of glaucoma had significantly higher knowledge scores than those who did not perform these tests in their practice (P < 0.05). A positive attitude toward glaucoma learning through workshops and hands-on training was reported by optometrists and students. Knowledge about glaucoma was good among optometrists and optometry students and was better among those who handled the diagnostics. All the optometrists had a positive attitude toward enhancing their practice through proper training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35647971
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2022_70_6_2014_346167
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_3168_21
pmc: PMC9359232
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2014-2019Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;62(4):482-6
pubmed: 24817749
Ophthalmology. 2003 Aug;110(8):1484-90
pubmed: 12917161
Eye (Lond). 2012 Jun;26(6):853-61
pubmed: 22498794
Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 May;90(5):579-85
pubmed: 16622087
Ophthalmology. 2000 Sep;107(9):1702-9
pubmed: 10964833
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep-Oct;60(5):401-5
pubmed: 22944749
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 May 31;9(5):2200-2206
pubmed: 32754474
Ophthalmology. 2008 Apr;115(4):648-654.e1
pubmed: 17664010
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 16;15:3041-3049
pubmed: 34295143
Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90
pubmed: 24974815
J Optom. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):158-65
pubmed: 26614021
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144-e160
pubmed: 33275949
Clin Exp Optom. 2015 Mar;98(2):160-7
pubmed: 25495891
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2012 Sep-Dec;6(3):108-12
pubmed: 26997765
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015 Nov;35(6):682-98
pubmed: 26432198
Ophthalmology. 2007 Oct;114(10):1816-21
pubmed: 17698198
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr-Jun;20(2):163-7
pubmed: 23741136
Ophthalmology. 2008 Apr;115(4):655-660.e1
pubmed: 17869343