Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as bailout strategy in iatrogenic pericardial tamponade.

Cardiac tamponade Coronary perforation Percutaneous intervention Pericardial tamponade Thrombin

Journal

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation
ISSN: 1568-5888
Titre abrégé: Neth Heart J
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101095458

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
accepted: 25 04 2022
pubmed: 2 6 2022
medline: 2 6 2022
entrez: 1 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cardiac tamponade is a rare but life-threatening complication of cardiac interventions. Despite prompt pericardiocentesis, clinical management can be challenging and sometimes haemodynamic stabilisation is difficult to achieve. Intra-pericardial thrombin injection after pericardiocentesis promotes haemostasis and acts as a sealing agent, as previously described for left ventricular free-wall rupture. We aimed to evaluate intra-pericardial thrombin injection as a bailout strategy for pericardial tamponade following percutaneous cardiac interventions. In a 5-year single-centre retrospective analysis we identified 31 patients with cardiac tamponade due to percutaneous intracardiac procedures. Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as a bailout strategy was administered in 5 of 31 patients (16.1%). Patients receiving intra-pericardial thrombin were in a more critical state when thrombin was applied, as demonstrated by a higher rate of resuscitation (40% versus 26.9%) and a trend toward a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (177.6 ± 84.0 vs 98.0 ± 31.4 h). None of the patients with pericardial tamponades treated with intra-pericardial thrombin needed cardiothoracic surgery. Mortality after 30 days was lower with intra-pericardial thrombin injection than with standard treatment (0% vs 15.4%). We observed no complications using intra-pericardial thrombin. Intra-pericardial thrombin injection could be considered as a bailout strategy for patients with iatrogenic pericardial tamponade due to percutaneous procedures. We recommend further evaluation of this technique in the clinical management of refractory pericardial tamponade.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cardiac tamponade is a rare but life-threatening complication of cardiac interventions. Despite prompt pericardiocentesis, clinical management can be challenging and sometimes haemodynamic stabilisation is difficult to achieve. Intra-pericardial thrombin injection after pericardiocentesis promotes haemostasis and acts as a sealing agent, as previously described for left ventricular free-wall rupture. We aimed to evaluate intra-pericardial thrombin injection as a bailout strategy for pericardial tamponade following percutaneous cardiac interventions.
METHODS METHODS
In a 5-year single-centre retrospective analysis we identified 31 patients with cardiac tamponade due to percutaneous intracardiac procedures. Intra-pericardial thrombin injection as a bailout strategy was administered in 5 of 31 patients (16.1%).
RESULTS RESULTS
Patients receiving intra-pericardial thrombin were in a more critical state when thrombin was applied, as demonstrated by a higher rate of resuscitation (40% versus 26.9%) and a trend toward a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (177.6 ± 84.0 vs 98.0 ± 31.4 h). None of the patients with pericardial tamponades treated with intra-pericardial thrombin needed cardiothoracic surgery. Mortality after 30 days was lower with intra-pericardial thrombin injection than with standard treatment (0% vs 15.4%). We observed no complications using intra-pericardial thrombin.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Intra-pericardial thrombin injection could be considered as a bailout strategy for patients with iatrogenic pericardial tamponade due to percutaneous procedures. We recommend further evaluation of this technique in the clinical management of refractory pericardial tamponade.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35648265
doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01701-y
pii: 10.1007/s12471-022-01701-y
pmc: PMC9892408
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

61-67

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

EuroIntervention. 2008 Aug;4(2):181-3
pubmed: 19110779
J Vasc Surg. 1997 Jul;26(1):18-23
pubmed: 9240316
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Feb 15;101(4):419-21
pubmed: 18312750
J Vasc Surg. 1998 Jun;27(6):1032-8
pubmed: 9652465
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Apr;4(4):439-42
pubmed: 17399630
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 14;349(7):684-90
pubmed: 12917306
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Oct 1;98(7):911-4
pubmed: 16996872
Br Heart J. 1995 Apr;73(4):351-4
pubmed: 7756068
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Mar;35(3):517-21
pubmed: 11877701
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):705-17
pubmed: 19695538
Arch Surg. 2002 Apr;137(4):462-4
pubmed: 11926954
Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Aug;14(8):931-8
pubmed: 22613584
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012 Dec;1(4):337-40
pubmed: 24062924
Circ J. 2002 Jul;66(7):705-6
pubmed: 12135143
Int Heart J. 2007 Jan;48(1):1-9
pubmed: 17379974
Heart Rhythm. 2005 Sep;2(9):907-11
pubmed: 16171740
Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 May;77(5):429-36
pubmed: 12004992
Jpn Circ J. 2000 Apr;64(4):312-5
pubmed: 10783056

Auteurs

D Rottländer (D)

Department of Cardiology, Rheinlandklinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.

M Saal (M)

Department of Cardiology, Rheinlandklinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany.

H Degen (H)

Department of Cardiology, Rheinlandklinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany.

M Haude (M)

Department of Cardiology, Rheinlandklinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany. mhaude@lukasneuss.de.

Classifications MeSH