Visual object recognition ability is not related to experience with visual arts.
Journal
Journal of vision
ISSN: 1534-7362
Titre abrégé: J Vis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101147197
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2022
01 06 2022
Historique:
entrez:
1
6
2022
pubmed:
2
6
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Visual arts require the ability to process, categorize, recognize, and understand a variety of visual inputs. These challenges may engage and even influence mechanisms that are also relevant for visual object recognition beyond visual arts. A domain-general object recognition ability that applies broadly across a range of visual tasks was recently discovered. Here, we ask whether experience with visual arts is correlated with this domain-general ability. We developed a new survey to measure general visual arts experience and use it to measure arts experience in 142 individuals in whom we also estimated domain-general object recognition ability. Despite our measures demonstrating high reliability in a large sample size, we found substantial evidence (BF01 = 9.52) for no correlation between visual arts experience and general object recognition ability. This suggests that experience in visual arts has little influence on object recognition skills or vice versa, at least in our sample ranging from low to moderately high levels of arts experience. Our methods can be extended to other populations and our results should be replicated, as they suggest some limitations for the generalization of programs targeting visual literacy beyond the visual arts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35648634
pii: 2778874
doi: 10.1167/jov.22.7.1
pmc: PMC9172047
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1Références
Psychol Sci. 2009 Sep;20(9):1108-17
pubmed: 19694980
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1057-64
pubmed: 22798023
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Oct;161:185-97
pubmed: 26372001
Psychol Methods. 2005 Jun;10(2):178-92
pubmed: 15998176
Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1262-1273
pubmed: 34355269
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):35-57
pubmed: 28779455
Iperception. 2014 May 06;5(2):101-19
pubmed: 25469216
Psychol Rev. 2019 Mar;126(2):226-251
pubmed: 30802123
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):991-7
pubmed: 18612730
Food Res Int. 2019 Sep;123:746-761
pubmed: 31285024
Psychol Assess. 2015 Jun;27(2):552-66
pubmed: 25642930
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433
pubmed: 28557467
Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:42-55
pubmed: 28554084
Psychol Methods. 2017 Jun;22(2):322-339
pubmed: 26651986
Vision Res. 1997 Jun;37(12):1673-82
pubmed: 9231232
J Prof Nurs. 2018 Sep - Oct;34(5):357-363
pubmed: 30243692
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Jan;154:36-42
pubmed: 25481660
Vision Res. 2012 Sep 15;69:10-22
pubmed: 22877929
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Mar;151(3):676-694
pubmed: 34582233
Iperception. 2013 Aug 07;4(6):380-95
pubmed: 24349697