The relationship between voting restrictions and COVID-19 case and mortality rates between US counties.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 02 11 2021
accepted: 13 04 2022
entrez: 1 6 2022
pubmed: 2 6 2022
medline: 7 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Since the 2010 election, the number of laws in the U.S. that create barriers to voting has increased dramatically. These laws may have spillover effects on population health by creating a disconnect between voter preferences and political representation, thereby limiting protective public health policies and funding. We examine whether voting restrictions are associated with county-level COVID-19 case and mortality rates. To obtain information on restricted access to voting, we used the Cost of Voting Index (COVI), a state-level measure of barriers to voting during a U.S. election from 1996 to 2016. COVID-19 case and mortality rates were obtained from the New York Times' GitHub database (a compilation from multiple academic sources). Multilevel modeling was used to determine whether restrictive voting laws were associated with county-level COVID-19 case and mortality rates after controlling for county-level characteristics from the County Health Rankings. We tested whether associations were heterogeneous across racial and socioeconomic groups. A significant association was observed between increasing voting restrictions and COVID-19 case (ß = 580.5, 95% CI = 3.9, 1157.2) and mortality rates (ß = 16.5, 95% CI = 0.33,32.6) when confounders were included. Restrictive voting laws were associated with higher COVID-19 case and mortality rates.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Since the 2010 election, the number of laws in the U.S. that create barriers to voting has increased dramatically. These laws may have spillover effects on population health by creating a disconnect between voter preferences and political representation, thereby limiting protective public health policies and funding. We examine whether voting restrictions are associated with county-level COVID-19 case and mortality rates.
METHODS
To obtain information on restricted access to voting, we used the Cost of Voting Index (COVI), a state-level measure of barriers to voting during a U.S. election from 1996 to 2016. COVID-19 case and mortality rates were obtained from the New York Times' GitHub database (a compilation from multiple academic sources). Multilevel modeling was used to determine whether restrictive voting laws were associated with county-level COVID-19 case and mortality rates after controlling for county-level characteristics from the County Health Rankings. We tested whether associations were heterogeneous across racial and socioeconomic groups.
RESULTS
A significant association was observed between increasing voting restrictions and COVID-19 case (ß = 580.5, 95% CI = 3.9, 1157.2) and mortality rates (ß = 16.5, 95% CI = 0.33,32.6) when confounders were included.
CONCLUSIONS
Restrictive voting laws were associated with higher COVID-19 case and mortality rates.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35648741
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267738
pii: PONE-D-21-34873
pmc: PMC9159582
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0267738

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:37-62
pubmed: 31765272
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Jan 5;:
pubmed: 33402397
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538
pubmed: 33686204
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):250-259
pubmed: 32333418
Am J Public Health. 2010 Sep;100(9):1758-64
pubmed: 20019300
Popul Health Metr. 2015 Apr 17;13:11
pubmed: 25931988
Allergy. 2021 Feb;76(2):428-455
pubmed: 33185910
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Feb;76(2):152-157
pubmed: 34253558
Public Health Rev. 2020 Jul 01;41:16
pubmed: 32626605
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1186-1197
pubmed: 33139897
J Urban Health. 2020 Aug;97(4):461-470
pubmed: 32691212
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2034578
pubmed: 33471120
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Aug;234:112371
pubmed: 31254964
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Sep;179:110892
pubmed: 34866723
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 21;7(4):e20699
pubmed: 33729168
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Aug 21;69(33):1122-1126
pubmed: 32817602
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Apr 1;46(2):211-233
pubmed: 32955556
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Jun;42(3):539-572
pubmed: 28213393
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):297-371
pubmed: 32191359

Auteurs

Roman Pabayo (R)

University of Alberta School of Public Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Erin Grinshteyn (E)

Health Professions Department, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Brian Steele (B)

University of Alberta School of Public Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Daniel M Cook (DM)

School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, United States of America.

Peter Muennig (P)

Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York City, New York, United States of America.

Sze Yan Liu (SY)

Public Health Department, Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH