A Case Study of Critical Reasons Behind Hospital Nurses Turnover Due to Challenges Across System Levels.
case study
health care
intention to leave
system theory
Journal
Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare
ISSN: 1178-2390
Titre abrégé: J Multidiscip Healthc
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101512691
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
21
02
2022
accepted:
21
04
2022
entrez:
2
6
2022
pubmed:
3
6
2022
medline:
3
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to analyze how critical factors at different levels in a health-care system interact and impact nurses' intention to leave and decision to quit their job at a hospital unit. A case study of assistant and registered nurses' intentions to leave as well as staff turnover at a smaller Swedish public hospital was performed. Employee surveys and interviews with assistant and registered nurses who had quit their job at four units in the hospital during the period 2012-2019 were performed. Critical factors regarding nurses' intention to leave and staff turnover are analyzed by combining narrative methods with a critical incidence technique. Three main themes emerge from the analysis of factors contributing to the decision to quit, namely Decision-makers, including hospital management, need to consider how supportive factors in nurses' closest work environment that promote staff retention may be impacted by decisions at higher levels, such as health-care reorganizations and stricter governance. In this context, upper management adopting a servant leadership approach might contribute to employees to a greater extent feeling valued and being listened to. Finally, the results indicate that individual nurses' recovery, ability to work and ability to coordinate their personal life with their work life need to be supported by policies and decisions at higher levels in order to retain nurses in intensive and emergency health-care settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35652111
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S363390
pii: 363390
pmc: PMC9148920
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1213-1224Informations de copyright
© 2022 Eriksson et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
J Nurs Manag. 2014 Jul;22(5):543-52
pubmed: 23829865
Health Econ. 2005 Sep;14(Suppl 1):S237-54
pubmed: 16161198
JAMA. 2002 Oct 23-30;288(16):1987-93
pubmed: 12387650
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Feb;49(3):315-22
pubmed: 15660556
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):143-53
pubmed: 23254247
Nurs Open. 2021 Mar;8(2):870-881
pubmed: 33570298
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Nov;32(5):1264-71
pubmed: 11115012
Nurs Econ. 2009 May-Jun;27(3):178-84, 202
pubmed: 19558078
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Feb;43(2):237-63
pubmed: 15878771
Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):831-58
pubmed: 22925138
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2008 Aug 01;1:51-8
pubmed: 21197333
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 30;17(21):
pubmed: 33143172
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jan;57(1):45-58
pubmed: 17184373
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr;74(4):864-875
pubmed: 29117451
Scand J Public Health. 2008 Jul;36(5):467-74
pubmed: 18635730
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 15;17(1):824
pubmed: 29246221
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):174-84
pubmed: 23107005
J Nurs Manag. 2013 May;21(4):605-13
pubmed: 23406374
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Aug;18(4):380-5
pubmed: 18292122
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jul;68(7):1589-600
pubmed: 22458811
J Nurs Manag. 2016 Nov;24(8):1088-1097
pubmed: 27411513
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):185-94
pubmed: 22204812
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jul;66(7):1422-34
pubmed: 20497270
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Apr;48(4):490-500
pubmed: 20863497
BMJ. 2000 May 20;320(7246):1395-8
pubmed: 10818037
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Nov;18(22):3181-9
pubmed: 19619211
Nurs Rep. 2021 Oct 19;11(4):787-810
pubmed: 34968269
J Pers Med. 2021 May 24;11(6):
pubmed: 34073655
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jul;52(7):1180-92
pubmed: 25863657
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jul;49(7):887-905
pubmed: 22019402
J Nurs Manag. 2016 Apr;24(3):393-9
pubmed: 26347211