Rationale and Recent Advances in Targeted Drug Delivery for Cancer Pain: Is It Time to Change the Paradigm?
intrathecal drug delivery systems
narrative review
opioids
undertreatment
Cancer pain
Journal
Pain physician
ISSN: 2150-1149
Titre abrégé: Pain Physician
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100954394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
entrez:
2
6
2022
pubmed:
3
6
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cancer pain prevalence remains high with more than 60% of patients with advanced cancer experiencing cancer-related pain. The undertreatment of pain due to concerns of opioid dependence or diversion, as well as the potential effect of opioids on tumor neogenesis, add to the suffering among cancer populations. The aim of this narrative review was to assess evidence on the effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, and advances of Intrathecal (IT) Drug Delivery Systems (IDDS) for the management of cancer pain. The present review was performed by searching for articles indexed in PubMed, MEDLINE, SciELO, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Studies were included if they investigated patients with chronic cancer-related pain treated with IDDS and assessed experienced pain. We performed a narrative synthesis. IDDS have demonstrated efficacy in relieving cancer pain even in the challenging treatment of head and neck cancer pain. IDDS is also associated with a large reduction in serum opioid concentrations limiting adverse effects. When combined with other analgesics commonly used in the spinal space, but not systemically, pain relief may be dramatically improved. Advances in IT drug diffusion, including mixtures created with pharmaceutical compounding, improve the safety and accuracy of this therapy. IDDS is cost-effective and safe yet remains underutilized in this patient population. Despite numerous clinical studies, only a small number of randomized trials have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of IDDS for cancer pain. This article presents an overview of the current state of evidence on the effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, and advances of IDDS for the management of cancer pain. Despite current evidence, IDDS remains underutilized for people with cancer pain. Potential areas to facilitate its use are discussed. A shift in the paradigm of cancer pain treatment should be considered given the undertreatment rate, lack of benefits, and considerable risks associated with oral opioid medication in many patients who suffer from chronic cancer pain.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cancer pain prevalence remains high with more than 60% of patients with advanced cancer experiencing cancer-related pain. The undertreatment of pain due to concerns of opioid dependence or diversion, as well as the potential effect of opioids on tumor neogenesis, add to the suffering among cancer populations.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this narrative review was to assess evidence on the effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, and advances of Intrathecal (IT) Drug Delivery Systems (IDDS) for the management of cancer pain.
STUDY DESIGN
The present review was performed by searching for articles indexed in PubMed, MEDLINE, SciELO, Google Scholar, and Scopus.
METHODS
Studies were included if they investigated patients with chronic cancer-related pain treated with IDDS and assessed experienced pain. We performed a narrative synthesis.
RESULTS
IDDS have demonstrated efficacy in relieving cancer pain even in the challenging treatment of head and neck cancer pain. IDDS is also associated with a large reduction in serum opioid concentrations limiting adverse effects. When combined with other analgesics commonly used in the spinal space, but not systemically, pain relief may be dramatically improved. Advances in IT drug diffusion, including mixtures created with pharmaceutical compounding, improve the safety and accuracy of this therapy. IDDS is cost-effective and safe yet remains underutilized in this patient population.
LIMITATIONS
Despite numerous clinical studies, only a small number of randomized trials have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of IDDS for cancer pain.
CONCLUSIONS
This article presents an overview of the current state of evidence on the effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, and advances of IDDS for the management of cancer pain. Despite current evidence, IDDS remains underutilized for people with cancer pain. Potential areas to facilitate its use are discussed. A shift in the paradigm of cancer pain treatment should be considered given the undertreatment rate, lack of benefits, and considerable risks associated with oral opioid medication in many patients who suffer from chronic cancer pain.
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM