Event-Related Potentials Following Cutaneous Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders.

electro-encephalography event-related potentials nociceptive stimulation Chronic whiplash-associated disorders

Journal

Pain physician
ISSN: 2150-1149
Titre abrégé: Pain Physician
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100954394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2022
Historique:
entrez: 2 6 2022
pubmed: 3 6 2022
medline: 7 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Whiplash injuries typically occur from a motor vehicle collision and lead to chronic whiplash-associated disorders (CWAD) in 20% to 50% of cases. Changes in neurotransmission, metabolism, and networks seem to play a role in the pathogenic mechanism of CWAD. To further elucidate the functional brain alterations, a neurophysiological study was performed to investigate the somatosensory processing of CWAD patients by comparing the event-related potentials (ERPs) resulting from electrical nociceptive stimulation between patients suffering from CWAD and healthy controls (HC). Case-control study. University Hospital in Ghent. In this case-control study (CWAD patients/HC: 50/50), ankle and wrist electrical pain thresholds (EPT), and amplitude and latency of the event-related potentials (ERPs) resulting from 20 electrical stimuli were investigated. Correlations between the ERP characteristics, EPT, self-reported pain, disability, pain catastrophizing, and self-reported symptoms of central sensitization were investigated. Only the latency of the P3 component after left wrist stimulation (t = -2.283; P = 0.023) differed between both groups. In CWAD patients, the ankle EPT correlated with the amplitude of the corresponding P1 (rho s = 0.293; P = 0.044) and P3 (rho s = 0.306; P = 0.033), as well as with the amplitude of the P3 to left wrist stimulation (rho s = 0.343; P = 0.017). Self-reported symptoms of CS correlated with right wrist P3 amplitude (rho s = 0.308; P = 0.030) and latency (rho s = -0.341; P = 0.015), and the worst pain reported during the past week was correlated with left wrist P1 latency (rho s = 0.319; P = 0.029). Although the inclusion criteria stated that CWAD patients had to report a moderate-to-severe pain-related disability, 8 of the included CWAD patients (that scored above this threshold in the inclusion questionnaire), scored below the required cutoff at baseline. The CWAD patients did not show signs of hypersensitivity, but their ERP characteristics were related to the intensity of the applied stimulus, self-reported symptoms of CS, and the worst pain reported during the past week.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Whiplash injuries typically occur from a motor vehicle collision and lead to chronic whiplash-associated disorders (CWAD) in 20% to 50% of cases. Changes in neurotransmission, metabolism, and networks seem to play a role in the pathogenic mechanism of CWAD.
OBJECTIVES
To further elucidate the functional brain alterations, a neurophysiological study was performed to investigate the somatosensory processing of CWAD patients by comparing the event-related potentials (ERPs) resulting from electrical nociceptive stimulation between patients suffering from CWAD and healthy controls (HC).
STUDY DESIGN
Case-control study.
SETTING
University Hospital in Ghent.
METHODS
In this case-control study (CWAD patients/HC: 50/50), ankle and wrist electrical pain thresholds (EPT), and amplitude and latency of the event-related potentials (ERPs) resulting from 20 electrical stimuli were investigated. Correlations between the ERP characteristics, EPT, self-reported pain, disability, pain catastrophizing, and self-reported symptoms of central sensitization were investigated.
RESULTS
Only the latency of the P3 component after left wrist stimulation (t = -2.283; P = 0.023) differed between both groups. In CWAD patients, the ankle EPT correlated with the amplitude of the corresponding P1 (rho s = 0.293; P = 0.044) and P3 (rho s = 0.306; P = 0.033), as well as with the amplitude of the P3 to left wrist stimulation (rho s = 0.343; P = 0.017). Self-reported symptoms of CS correlated with right wrist P3 amplitude (rho s = 0.308; P = 0.030) and latency (rho s = -0.341; P = 0.015), and the worst pain reported during the past week was correlated with left wrist P1 latency (rho s = 0.319; P = 0.029).
LIMITATIONS
Although the inclusion criteria stated that CWAD patients had to report a moderate-to-severe pain-related disability, 8 of the included CWAD patients (that scored above this threshold in the inclusion questionnaire), scored below the required cutoff at baseline.
CONCLUSIONS
The CWAD patients did not show signs of hypersensitivity, but their ERP characteristics were related to the intensity of the applied stimulus, self-reported symptoms of CS, and the worst pain reported during the past week.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35652773

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

E435-E448

Auteurs

Dorine Lenoir (D)

Pain in Motion International Research Group; Department of Rehabilitation sciences, Ghent University, Campus Heymans, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Brussels, Belgium; Bijzonder onderzoeksfonds Gent (BOF), Belgium.

Ward Willaert (W)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group,Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.

Kelly Ickmans (K)

Pain in Motion Research Group (www.paininmotion.be); Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium.

Jo Nijs (J)

Pain in Motion Research Group (www.paininmotion.be); Department of Human Physiology and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

Barbara Cagnie (B)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Spine, Pain and Head Research Unit Ghent, Ghent University, Belgium.

Mira Meeus (M)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Spine, Pain and Head Research Unit Ghent, Ghent University, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium; MOVANT Research group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium.

Kristl Vonck (K)

Department of Neurology, 4Brain, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Jean Delbeke (J)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Robby De Pauw (R)

Department of Rehabilitation sciences, Ghent University, Campus Heymans, Ghent, Belgium.

Iris Coppieters (I)

Pain in Motion International Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH