Stability of fiducial cephalometric landmarks of growing Class II malocclusion patients: a three-dimensional retrospective study.

Cephalometry Cone-beam computed tomography Growth and development Imaging Three-dimensional

Journal

The Angle orthodontist
ISSN: 1945-7103
Titre abrégé: Angle Orthod
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370550

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jun 2022
Historique:
accepted: 01 04 2022
received: 01 09 2021
entrez: 2 6 2022
pubmed: 3 6 2022
medline: 3 6 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To evaluate three-dimensionally (3D) the stability of Nasion (Na), Sella (S), Basion (Ba), Porion (Po), and Orbitale (Or) in different age groups of growing Class II malocclusion patients and, additionally, to assess rotational changes of the S-Na and Ba-Na lines and the Frankfurt Horizontal Plane (FHP). Cone-beam computed tomography studies of 67 Class II division 1 malocclusion patients, acquired at baseline (T0) and 1 year later (T1), were retrospectively assessed. Anterior cranial fossa was used for volumetric superimposition. Subjects were grouped according to their age at T0: group 1 (G1) (8-10 years), G2 (11-13 years), and G3 (14-17 years). Quantitative assessments of the 3D linear displacements (Euclidean distance) in the position of Na, S, Ba, Po, and Or were performed. Displacement in the X, Y, and Z projections and the rotation of S-Na, Na-Ba, and FHP were also quantified. All cephalometric landmarks showed 3D displacement (P = .001) in the three age groups. Orbitale remained stable in the vertical and sagittal dimension from 8 to 17 years (P > .05). S-Na, Na-Ba, and the FHP showed statistically significant angular rotation (P < .05) in younger patients (G1), while in older individuals (G2 and G3) they were stable (P > .05). Na, S, Ba, and Po showed vertical and sagittal positional changes relative to the anterior cranial fossa during the growth of Class II individuals. After age 11, S-Na, Na-Ba, and FHP did not show rotation and, thus, are valid parameters for angular cephalometric analysis in Class II growing patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35653223
pii: 482423
doi: 10.2319/090721-692.1
pmc: PMC9374362
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 0000 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.

Références

Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2000 Winter;15(4):290-8
pubmed: 11307186
Angle Orthod. 2010 Jul;80(4):537-44
pubmed: 20482360
Growth. 1971 Jun;35(2):145-58
pubmed: 5141423
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9
pubmed: 18313558
Angle Orthod. 2022 Mar 1;92(2):226-232
pubmed: 34605860
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jul;146(1):21-32.e6
pubmed: 24974995
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):158-63
pubmed: 21447784
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 May;149(5):645-56
pubmed: 27131246
Acta Odontol Scand. 1973;31(5):323-34
pubmed: 4520245
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):611-8
pubmed: 16679201
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Feb;151(2):342-350.e2
pubmed: 28153164
Angle Orthod. 2017 Nov;87(6):897-910
pubmed: 28737426
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Dec;114(6):709-12; discussion 713-4
pubmed: 9844212
Angle Orthod. 2020 May 1;90(3):390-396
pubmed: 33378429
Angle Orthod. 2018 Nov;88(6):757-764
pubmed: 30004786
Angle Orthod. 2018 Mar;88(2):233-245
pubmed: 29189039
Angle Orthod. 2021 Nov 1;91(6):822-829
pubmed: 34129666

Auteurs

Classifications MeSH