Exposure to road traffic noise and cognitive development in schoolchildren in Barcelona, Spain: A population-based cohort study.
Journal
PLoS medicine
ISSN: 1549-1676
Titre abrégé: PLoS Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
13
10
2021
accepted:
27
04
2022
entrez:
2
6
2022
pubmed:
3
6
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Road traffic noise is a prevalent and known health hazard. However, little is known yet about its effect on children's cognition. We aimed to study the association between exposure to road traffic noise and the development of working memory and attention in primary school children, considering school-outdoor and school-indoor annual average noise levels and noise fluctuation characteristics, as well as home-outdoor noise exposure. We followed up a population-based sample of 2,680 children aged 7 to 10 years from 38 schools in Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) between January 2012 to March 2013. Children underwent computerised cognitive tests 4 times (n = 10,112), for working memory (2-back task, detectability), complex working memory (3-back task, detectability), and inattentiveness (Attention Network Task, hit reaction time standard error, in milliseconds). Road traffic noise was measured indoors and outdoors at schools, at the start of the school year, using standard protocols to obtain A-weighted equivalent sound pressure levels, i.e., annual average levels scaled to human hearing, for the daytime (daytime LAeq, in dB). We also derived fluctuation indicators out of the measurements (noise intermittency ratio, %; and number of noise events) and obtained individual estimated indoor noise levels (LAeq) correcting for classroom orientation and classroom change between years. Home-outdoor noise exposure at home (Lden, i.e., EU indicator for the 24-hour annual average levels) was estimated using Barcelona's noise map for year 2012, according to the European Noise Directive (2002). We used linear mixed models to evaluate the association between exposure to noise and cognitive development adjusting for age, sex, maternal education, socioeconomical vulnerability index at home, indoor or outdoor traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) for corresponding school models or outdoor nitrogen dioxide (NO2) for home models. Child and school were included as nested random effects. The median age (percentile 25, percentile 75) of children in visit 1 was 8.5 (7.8; 9.3) years, 49.9% were girls, and 50% of the schools were public. School-outdoor exposure to road traffic noise was associated with a slower development in working memory (2-back and 3-back) and greater inattentiveness over 1 year in children, both for the average noise level (e.g., ‒4.83 points [95% CI: ‒7.21, ‒2.45], p-value < 0.001, in 2-back detectability per 5 dB in street levels) and noise fluctuation (e.g., ‒4.38 [‒7.08, ‒1.67], p-value = 0.002, per 50 noise events at street level). Individual exposure to the road traffic average noise level in classrooms was only associated with inattentiveness (2.49 ms [0, 4.81], p-value = 0.050, per 5 dB), whereas indoor noise fluctuation was consistently associated with all outcomes. Home-outdoor noise exposure was not associated with the outcomes. Study limitations include a potential lack of generalizability (58% of mothers with university degree in our study versus 50% in the region) and the lack of past noise exposure assessment. We observed that exposure to road traffic noise at school, but not at home, was associated with slower development of working memory, complex working memory, and attention in schoolchildren over 1 year. Associations with noise fluctuation indicators were more evident than with average noise levels in classrooms.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Road traffic noise is a prevalent and known health hazard. However, little is known yet about its effect on children's cognition. We aimed to study the association between exposure to road traffic noise and the development of working memory and attention in primary school children, considering school-outdoor and school-indoor annual average noise levels and noise fluctuation characteristics, as well as home-outdoor noise exposure.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
We followed up a population-based sample of 2,680 children aged 7 to 10 years from 38 schools in Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) between January 2012 to March 2013. Children underwent computerised cognitive tests 4 times (n = 10,112), for working memory (2-back task, detectability), complex working memory (3-back task, detectability), and inattentiveness (Attention Network Task, hit reaction time standard error, in milliseconds). Road traffic noise was measured indoors and outdoors at schools, at the start of the school year, using standard protocols to obtain A-weighted equivalent sound pressure levels, i.e., annual average levels scaled to human hearing, for the daytime (daytime LAeq, in dB). We also derived fluctuation indicators out of the measurements (noise intermittency ratio, %; and number of noise events) and obtained individual estimated indoor noise levels (LAeq) correcting for classroom orientation and classroom change between years. Home-outdoor noise exposure at home (Lden, i.e., EU indicator for the 24-hour annual average levels) was estimated using Barcelona's noise map for year 2012, according to the European Noise Directive (2002). We used linear mixed models to evaluate the association between exposure to noise and cognitive development adjusting for age, sex, maternal education, socioeconomical vulnerability index at home, indoor or outdoor traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) for corresponding school models or outdoor nitrogen dioxide (NO2) for home models. Child and school were included as nested random effects. The median age (percentile 25, percentile 75) of children in visit 1 was 8.5 (7.8; 9.3) years, 49.9% were girls, and 50% of the schools were public. School-outdoor exposure to road traffic noise was associated with a slower development in working memory (2-back and 3-back) and greater inattentiveness over 1 year in children, both for the average noise level (e.g., ‒4.83 points [95% CI: ‒7.21, ‒2.45], p-value < 0.001, in 2-back detectability per 5 dB in street levels) and noise fluctuation (e.g., ‒4.38 [‒7.08, ‒1.67], p-value = 0.002, per 50 noise events at street level). Individual exposure to the road traffic average noise level in classrooms was only associated with inattentiveness (2.49 ms [0, 4.81], p-value = 0.050, per 5 dB), whereas indoor noise fluctuation was consistently associated with all outcomes. Home-outdoor noise exposure was not associated with the outcomes. Study limitations include a potential lack of generalizability (58% of mothers with university degree in our study versus 50% in the region) and the lack of past noise exposure assessment.
CONCLUSIONS
We observed that exposure to road traffic noise at school, but not at home, was associated with slower development of working memory, complex working memory, and attention in schoolchildren over 1 year. Associations with noise fluctuation indicators were more evident than with average noise levels in classrooms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35653430
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004001
pii: PMEDICINE-D-21-04323
pmc: PMC9162347
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1004001Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS Med. 2015 Mar 03;12(3):e1001792
pubmed: 25734425
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Aug 15;176(4):327-37
pubmed: 22842719
Environ Res. 2017 Nov;159:416-421
pubmed: 28858754
Pharmacogn Mag. 2016 Jan;12(Suppl 1):S7-S13
pubmed: 27041862
Environ Health. 2010 Jun 01;9:25
pubmed: 20515466
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1993;65(3):205-7
pubmed: 8282419
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 May;36(3):813-820
pubmed: 20438278
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Dec;49(14):3854-62
pubmed: 22001853
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 30;8:8
pubmed: 28194118
J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 29;34(5):1592-8
pubmed: 24478343
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Oct;124(10):1630-1636
pubmed: 27128166
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Feb;21(2):316-32
pubmed: 18510448
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;26(6):575-585
pubmed: 26350982
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 07;15(2):
pubmed: 29414890
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Aug 15;490:757-65
pubmed: 24907610
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;46(7):755-73
pubmed: 15972069
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 May;106(1):20-9
pubmed: 20018296
Environ Res. 2012 May;115:18-25
pubmed: 22483436
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015 Jun;2(2):171-8
pubmed: 26231366
Child Neuropsychol. 2002 Jun;8(2):71-82
pubmed: 12638061
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 May;122(5):439-46
pubmed: 24584099
Neuropsychology. 2014 Jul;28(4):519-29
pubmed: 24819069
Neurosci Lett. 2006 May 15;399(1-2):17-22
pubmed: 16481110
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;2 Suppl 1:S192-204
pubmed: 22682908
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Nov;40(11):1337-45
pubmed: 11699809
Noise Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;12(49):244-54
pubmed: 20871179
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 11;102(41):14931-6
pubmed: 16192352
Environ Int. 2019 Apr;125:277-290
pubmed: 30731377
Learn Mem. 2003 Jan-Feb;10(1):74-81
pubmed: 12551966
Lancet. 2005 Jun 4-10;365(9475):1942-9
pubmed: 15936421
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Sep 07;125(9):097004
pubmed: 28934719
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 07;17(2):
pubmed: 31936110
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 22;7:7
pubmed: 26834680
Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1325-1332
pubmed: 24183105
Environ Int. 2014 Aug;69:200-12
pubmed: 24875803
Eur Heart J. 2018 Oct 7;39(38):3528-3539
pubmed: 29905797
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Sep 15;493:943-53
pubmed: 25003584
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(8):1029-40
pubmed: 15093142
Arch Pediatr. 2009 Jan;16(1):47-53
pubmed: 19036567
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 May 7;47(9):4357-64
pubmed: 23534892