Reduction of environmental chemicals, toxicity and particulate matter in wet scrubber device to achieve zero emissions.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 06 2022
02 06 2022
Historique:
received:
04
12
2021
accepted:
16
05
2022
entrez:
2
6
2022
pubmed:
3
6
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The fine particles generated by the foundry industry are present in the atmosphere; they have an impact on the climate because of their influence on atmospheric radioactive phenomena. As a result of this scenario, there is a rising amount of legislation restricting the emission of pollutants from foundry industries and related businesses. In response to this situation, many researchers have concentrated on end-of-pipe technologies, one of which is the wet scrubber, which is a device that is primarily used in foundries to control pollution and is one of the devices that has been incorporated. The disadvantage of using this wet scrubber, on the other hand, is that it contributes to secondary pollution when it is used. In order to combat secondary pollution, a model of an enhanced wet scrubber system that incorporates a multi-sand filtering technology was developed. The performance of this redesigned wet scrubber system was evaluated with the use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software. In CFD, the Reynolds stress model was applied for simulation. The pressure magnitudes and velocity magnitudes are obtained by this simulation. The volume fraction of the dust was evaluated through the DPM approach. Because of the introduction of the filtration tank's computation, it was discovered that successful filtration was accomplished using sand filters, meaning that environmental chemicals and particles were totally filtered from 0.17 kg at the entrance to zero kg of particles at the outflow.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35654879
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13369-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-13369-w
pmc: PMC9163193
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dust
0
Particulate Matter
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9170Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Arya, S., Sottile, J. & Novak, T. Numerical modeling of a flooded-bed dust scrubber integrated into a longwall shearer. Mining Metall. Explor. 37, 1105–1119 (2020).
Bari, A. et al. Regional sources of particulate sulfate, SO
doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00200-0
Bhave, A. G., Vyas, D. K. & Patel, J. B. A wet packed bed scrubber-based producer gas cooling–cleaning system. Renew. Energy. 33, 1716–1720 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2007.08.014
Biard, P. F., Couvert, A., Renner, C. & Levasseur, J. P. Assessment and optimization of VOC mass transfer enhancement by advanced oxidation process in a compact wet scrubber. Chemosphere 77(2), 182–187 (2009).
pubmed: 19695665
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.050
Biswas, S., Verma, V., Schauer, J. J. & Sioutas, C. Chemical speciation of PM emissions from heavy-duty diesel vehicles equipped with diesel particulate filter (DPF) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) retrofits. Atmos. Environ. 43(11), 1917–1925 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.040
Chandrasekara Pillai, K., Chung, S. J., Raju, T. & Moon, I. S. Experimental aspects of combined NOx and SO
pubmed: 19500817
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.04.013
Choi, K. I. & Lee, D. H. PCDD/DF concentrations at the inlets and outlets of wet scrubbers in Korean waste incinerators. Chemosphere 66(2), 370–376 (2007).
pubmed: 16793115
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.094
Daz-Somoano, M., Unterberger, S. & Hein, K. R. G. Mercury emission control in coal-fired plants: The role of wet scrubbers. Fuel Process. Technol. 88(3), 259–263 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.10.003
Donaldson, K. et al. Combustion-derived nanoparticles: A review of their toxicology following inhalation exposure. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2, 1–14 (2005).
doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-2-10
Dybdahl, M. et al. Inflammatory and genotoxic effects of diesel particles in vitro and in vivo. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. Mutat. Res-Gen Tox. En. 562(1–2), 119–131 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.05.010
Fadeel, B. & Garcia-Bennett, A. E. Better safe than sorry: Understanding the toxicological properties of inorganic nanoparticles manufactured for biomedical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 62(3), 362–374 (2010).
pubmed: 19900497
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.008
Gamisans, X., Sarrà, M., Lafuente, F. J. & Azzopardi, B. J. The split of the liquid phase in drops and film in an ejector-Venturi scrubber. Chem. Eng. Commun. 191(3), 398–413 (2004).
doi: 10.1080/00986440490272564
Gilmour, M. I., O’Connor, S., Dick, C. A. J., Miller, C. A. & Linak, W. P. Differential pulmonary inflammation and in vitro cytotoxicity of size-fractionated fly ash particles from pulverized coal combustion. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 54(3), 286–295 (2004).
pubmed: 15061611
doi: 10.1080/10473289.2004.10470906
Guanglong, W., Yangzhao, S., Jiahong, X. & Yong, L. Research on pollution prevention and control BAT of PCDD/Fs in secondary copper industry. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 181, 308–311 (2019).
pubmed: 31202930
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.077
Hirano, S., Furuyama, A., Koike, E. & Kobayashi, T. Oxidative-stress potency of organic extracts of diesel exhaust and urban fine particles in rat heart microvessel endothelial cells. Toxicology 187(2–3), 161–170 (2003).
pubmed: 12699905
doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(03)00053-2
Idrees, Z. & Zheng, L. Low cost air pollution monitoring systems: A review of protocols and enabling technologies. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 17, 100123 (2020).
Kennedy, I. M. The health effects of combustion-generated aerosols. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31(2), 2757–2770 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.116
Komazaki, Y., Hashimoto, S., Inoue, T. & Tanaka, S. Direct collection of HNO
doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00571-4
Ali, S. et al. Experimental investigation of aerosols removal efficiency through self-priming venturi scrubber. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52(10), 2230–2237 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.net.2020.03.019
Krishnaraj, R. Contemporary and futuristic views of pollution control devices in foundries. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 120, 130–135 (2015).
pubmed: 26070042
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.05.045
Krishnaraj, R. Control of pollution emitted by foundries. Environ. Chem. Lett. 13(2), 149–156 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s10311-015-0500-z
Press Lee, B. K., Raj Mohan, B., Byeon, S. H., Lim, K. S. & Hong, E. P. Evaluating the performance of a turbulent wet scrubber for scrubbing particulate matter. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 63(5), 499–506 (2013).
doi: 10.1080/10962247.2012.738626
Lehner, M., Mayinger, F. & Geipel, W. Separation of dust, halogen and PCDD/F in a compact wet scrubber. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 79(2), 109–116 (2001).
doi: 10.1205/09575820151095193
Sun, W., Shao, Y., Zhao, L. & Wang, Q. Co-removal of CO
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120511
Yin, Z. et al. A comprehensive review on cultivation and harvesting of microalgae for biodiesel production: Environmental pollution control and future directions. Bioresour. Technol. 301, 122804 (2020).
pubmed: 31982297
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122804
Lothgren, C. J. & Van Bavel, B. Dioxin emissions after installation of a polishing wet scrubber in a hazardous waste incineration facility. Chemosphere 61(3), 405–412 (2005).
pubmed: 16182858
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.015
Maheswari, C., Krishnamurthy, K. & Parameshwaran, R. Modeling and experimental analysis of packed column for SO2 emission control process. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 5(3), 464–470 (2014).
doi: 10.5094/APR.2014.054
Menon, S., Hansen, J., Nazarenko, L. & Luo, Y. Climate effects of black carbon aerosols in China and India. Science 297(5590), 2250–2253 (2002).
pubmed: 12351786
doi: 10.1126/science.1075159
Oberdörster, G., Oberdörster, E. & Oberdörster, J. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ. Health Perspect. 113(7), 823–839 (2005).
pubmed: 16002369
pmcid: 1257642
doi: 10.1289/ehp.7339
Nascimento, A. P. et al. Association between the incidence of acute respiratory diseases in children and ambient concentrations of SO
pubmed: 32531523
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109619
Perevezentsev, A. N. et al. Wet scrubber technology for tritium confinement at ITER. Fusion Eng. Des. 85(7–9), 1206–1210 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.03.005
Chang, E. T., Lau, E. C. & Moolgavkar, S. H. Smoking, air pollution, and lung cancer risk in the Nurses’ Health Study cohort: Time-dependent confounding and effect modification. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 50(3), 189–200 (2020).
pubmed: 32162564
pmcid: 7269844
doi: 10.1080/10408444.2020.1727410
Rafidi, N., Brogaard, F., Chen, L., Håkansson, R. & Tabikh, A. CFD and experimental studies on capture of fine particles by liquid droplets in open spray towers. Sustain. Environ. Res. 28(6), 382–388 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.serj.2018.08.003
Renwick, L. C., Brown, D., Clouter, A. & Donaldson, K. Increased inflammation and altered macrophage chemotactic responses caused by two ultrafine particle types. Occup. Environ. Med. 61(5), 442–447 (2004).
pubmed: 15090666
pmcid: 1740792
doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.008227
Sacirovic, S., Ketin, S. & Vignjevic, N. Eco-industrial zones in the context of sustainability development of urban areas. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26(24), 24346–24356 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1390-y
Selvakumar, K. & Kim, M. Y. A numerical study on the fluid flow and thermal characteristics inside the scrubber with water injection. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 30(2), 915–923 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s12206-016-0145-2
Abbaspour, N., Haghshenasfard, M., Talaei, M. R. & Amini, H. Experimental investigation of using nanofluids in the gas absorption in a venturi scrubber equipped with a magnetic field. J. Mol. Liq. 303, 112689 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112689
Yang, J. & Zhang, B. Air pollution and healthcare expenditure: Implication for the benefit of air pollution control in China. Environ. Int. 120, 443–455 (2018).
pubmed: 30142582
doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.011
Yang, Y. et al. Variations of PCDD/Fs emissions from secondary nonferrous smelting plants and towards to their source emission reduction. Environ. Pollut. 260, 113946 (2020).
pubmed: 32041007
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.113946
Kim, J. S. & Park, J. W. A method of estimating aerosol particle removal rates using one-dimensional two-fluid equations for venturi scrubbers in filtered containment venting. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 145, 107543 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107543
Zhang, Y. et al. Source apportionment of PM2.5 pollution in the central six districts of Beijing, China. J. Clean. Prod. 174, 661–669 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.332
Leiva, L. et al. Noisy waters can influence young-of-year lobsters’ substrate choice and their antipredatory responses. Environ. Pollut. 291, 118108 (2021).
pubmed: 34520946
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118108
Wong, Y. K., Huang, X. H., Cheng, Y. Y. & Yu, J. Z. Estimating primary vehicular emission contributions to PM2.5 using the chemical mass balance model: Accounting for gas-particle partitioning of organic aerosols and oxidation degradation of hopanes. Environ. Pollut. 291, 118131 (2021).
pubmed: 34530241
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118131
Wong, W. et al. Substantial leakage into indoor air from on-site solid fuel combustion in chimney stoves. Environ. Pollut. 291, 118138 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118138
Shah, Y., Kurelek, J. W., Peterson, S. D. & Yarusevych, S. Experimental investigation of indoor aerosol dispersion and accumulation in the context of COVID-19: Effects of masks and ventilation. Phys. Fluids 33(7), 073315 (2021).
doi: 10.1063/5.0057100
Zhao, H. et al. Indoor air quality in new and renovated low-income apartments with mechanical ventilation and natural gas cooking in California. Ind. Air 31(3), 717–729 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/ina.12764
Fluent, Inc. Fluent 6.1.22 Users' Guide. (2004).
Venkatesh, S. et al. Experimental and numerical investigation in the series arrangement square cyclone separator. Powd. Technol. 383, 93–103 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.01.031