Accelerating problem-solving capacities of sub-national public health professionals: an evaluation of a digital immunization training intervention.

Capacity-building Evaluation Immunization Peer learning Problem-solving capabilities Sub-national public health professionals Training

Journal

BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 14 10 2021
accepted: 23 05 2022
entrez: 2 6 2022
pubmed: 3 6 2022
medline: 7 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This article reports an evaluation of the Immunization Training Challenge Hackathons (ITCH), invented by The Geneva Learning Foundation (TGLF) for national and sub-national immunization staff who strive to develop the knowledge and capacity of others to improve immunization program performance. ITCH, a fully-digital program focused on networked collaborative problem-solving between peers, provided an "opt-in" activity for learners in the Teach to Reach (T2R) Accelerator Program designed to improve training effectiveness in the immunization sphere. Conducted by a team from the University of Georgia, this mixed method evaluation consisted of thematic analysis of recorded sessions and open-ended comments; and statistical analyses of application and follow-up survey data. The evaluation focused on what was learned and how ITCH participants implemented what they learned. Key stakeholder interviews provided supplemental data about program intent and results. ITCH consisted of 17 30-min sessions held in 2020, in English and French, with 581 participating at least once out of 1,454 enrolled in the overall program. Challenge owners and respondents came from 15 African and Asian countries and spanned different roles with differing scope. Over 85% [n = 154] of survey respondents [n = 181, a 31% response rate] indicated they were able to implement what they learned from the ITCH sessions. A majority [n = 139, 76.7%] reported finding the sessions useful. Issues with poor connectivity and the timing of the live meetings impeded some in their ability to participate, a problem compounded by consequences of the pandemic. The ITCH process constituted of learning or coming to consciousness simultaneously of four types of learning - participants realizing how much they could learn from each other (peer learning), experiencing the power of defying distance to solve problems together (remote learning), and feeling a growing sense of belonging to a community (social learning), emergent across country borders and health system levels (networked learning). Based on evaluation findings, it was concluded that ITCH demonstrated an effective scalable, informal, non-didactic, experience-led, fast-paced, peer learning design. A focus on community engagement and developing brokering skills was recommended.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This article reports an evaluation of the Immunization Training Challenge Hackathons (ITCH), invented by The Geneva Learning Foundation (TGLF) for national and sub-national immunization staff who strive to develop the knowledge and capacity of others to improve immunization program performance. ITCH, a fully-digital program focused on networked collaborative problem-solving between peers, provided an "opt-in" activity for learners in the Teach to Reach (T2R) Accelerator Program designed to improve training effectiveness in the immunization sphere.
METHODS METHODS
Conducted by a team from the University of Georgia, this mixed method evaluation consisted of thematic analysis of recorded sessions and open-ended comments; and statistical analyses of application and follow-up survey data. The evaluation focused on what was learned and how ITCH participants implemented what they learned. Key stakeholder interviews provided supplemental data about program intent and results. ITCH consisted of 17 30-min sessions held in 2020, in English and French, with 581 participating at least once out of 1,454 enrolled in the overall program. Challenge owners and respondents came from 15 African and Asian countries and spanned different roles with differing scope.
RESULTS RESULTS
Over 85% [n = 154] of survey respondents [n = 181, a 31% response rate] indicated they were able to implement what they learned from the ITCH sessions. A majority [n = 139, 76.7%] reported finding the sessions useful. Issues with poor connectivity and the timing of the live meetings impeded some in their ability to participate, a problem compounded by consequences of the pandemic. The ITCH process constituted of learning or coming to consciousness simultaneously of four types of learning - participants realizing how much they could learn from each other (peer learning), experiencing the power of defying distance to solve problems together (remote learning), and feeling a growing sense of belonging to a community (social learning), emergent across country borders and health system levels (networked learning).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Based on evaluation findings, it was concluded that ITCH demonstrated an effective scalable, informal, non-didactic, experience-led, fast-paced, peer learning design. A focus on community engagement and developing brokering skills was recommended.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35655276
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08138-4
pii: 10.1186/s12913-022-08138-4
pmc: PMC9161754
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

736

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Hum Resour Health. 2019 Dec 2;17(1):92
pubmed: 31791352
Eval Program Plann. 2012 Nov;35(4):518-22
pubmed: 22364849
Lancet. 2005 Sep 17-23;366(9490):1026-35
pubmed: 16168785
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(Suppl 5):
pubmed: 34312157
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014 Dec 10;2(4):381-94
pubmed: 25611473

Auteurs

Karen E Watkins (KE)

Learning, Leadership and Organization Development Program, Mary Frances Early College of Education, University of Georgia, 850 College Station Rd, Athens, GA, USA. kwatkins@uga.edu.

Lorilee R Sandmann (LR)

Learning, Leadership and Organization Development Program, Mary Frances Early College of Education, University of Georgia, 850 College Station Rd, Athens, GA, USA.

Cody Aaron Dailey (CA)

College of Public Health, University of Georgia, 100 Foster Rd, Athens, GA, USA.

Beixi Li (B)

Office of Health Affairs, West Virginia University, 64 Medical Center Dr, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Sung-Eun Yang (SE)

Learning, Leadership and Organization Development Program, Mary Frances Early College of Education, University of Georgia, 850 College Station Rd, Athens, GA, USA.

Robert S Galen (RS)

College of Public Health, University of Georgia, 100 Foster Rd, Athens, GA, USA.

Reda Sadki (R)

The Geneva Learning Foundation, Av. Louis-Casaï 18, Geneva, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH