Diversity and Conservation Gap Analysis of the Solanaceae of Southern South America.

biodiverse conservation biogeography micro-hotspots plant blindness protected areas

Journal

Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 13 01 2022
accepted: 11 04 2022
entrez: 3 6 2022
pubmed: 4 6 2022
medline: 4 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is a need to make substantial advances in the taxonomic, systematic, and distribution knowledge of plants, and find better ways of transmission of this information to society to surpass the general pattern described as "plant blindness." The diversity of the plant family Solanaceae reaches its peak in South America; however, many of its species are threatened due to the expansion of the human footprint. Here, we examine the diversity patterns of the family in southern South America (Argentina and Chile) by means of species richness (SR), weighted endemism (WE), and corrected weighted endemism (CWE). We also evaluated conservation gaps in relation to protected areas and the human footprint as a proxy for potential impacts on this biodiversity. Results show two richness centers in NW and NE Argentina, with a high degree of overlap with protected areas, which, on the other side, show a relative high index of human footprint. Comparatively, coastal Atacama (Chile) shows lower richness values, but outstanding CWE and WE values. The coast of Atacama harbors high values due the presence of species of the genus

Identifiants

pubmed: 35656013
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.854372
pmc: PMC9152431
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

854372

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Moreira-Muñoz, Palchetti, Morales-Fierro, Duval, Allesch-Villalobos and González-Orozco.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

PhytoKeys. 2022 Jan 18;188:83-103
pubmed: 35095294
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2020;92(2):e20190017
pubmed: 32785441
Insects. 2021 Oct 08;12(10):
pubmed: 34680685
Am J Bot. 2020 Dec;107(12):1749-1762
pubmed: 33247843
PhytoKeys. 2021 Nov 08;185:1-15
pubmed: 34819777
PhytoKeys. 2020 Oct 21;164:33-66
pubmed: 33173403
Science. 2017 Dec 22;358(6370):1614-1617
pubmed: 29269477
Am J Bot. 2001 Nov;88(11):2101-12
pubmed: 21669641
PhytoKeys. 2020 Aug 04;154:57-102
pubmed: 32848499
Environ Manage. 2010 Nov;46(5):748-60
pubmed: 20814677
Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 2;7(14):
pubmed: 33811082
PhytoKeys. 2020 Aug 21;156:47-54
pubmed: 32913407

Auteurs

Andrés Moreira-Muñoz (A)

Instituto de Geografía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.

María Virginia Palchetti (MV)

Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal - IMBIV, CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.

Vanezza Morales-Fierro (V)

Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Interior Parque Quinta Normal S/N, Santiago, Chile.

Valeria Soledad Duval (VS)

Departamento de Geografía y Turismo, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina.

Rudy Allesch-Villalobos (R)

Instituto de Geografía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.

Carlos E González-Orozco (CE)

Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria- Agrosavia, Centro de Investigación La Libertad, Meta, Colombia.

Classifications MeSH