The Attractiveness of Masked Faces Is Influenced by Race and Mask Attitudes.
COVID-19
affective appreciation
affective devaluation
facial attractiveness
microvalence
protective mask
sanitary mask
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
29
01
2022
accepted:
20
04
2022
entrez:
3
6
2022
pubmed:
4
6
2022
medline:
4
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study tests the influence of wearing a protective face mask on the perceived attractiveness of the wearer. Participants who identified as White, and who varied in their ideological stance toward mask wearing, rated the attractiveness of facial photographs. The photos varied in baseline attractiveness (low, medium, and high), race (White and Asian), and whether or not the face was wearing a protective mask. Attitudes regarding protective masks were measured after the rating task using a survey to identify participants as either pro- or anti-mask. The results showed that masked individuals of the same race were generally rated as more attractive than unmasked individuals, but that masked individuals of another race were rated as less attractive than unmasked individuals. Moreover, pro-mask participants rated masked individuals as generally more attractive than unmasked individuals, whereas anti-maskers rated masked individuals as less attractive. A control experiment, replicating the procedure but replacing the protective masks with a partially occluding notebook, showed that these effects were mask-specific. These results demonstrate that perceived attractiveness is affected by characteristics of the viewer (attitudes toward protective masks), their relationship to the target (same or different race), and by circumstances external to both (pandemic).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35656497
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864936
pmc: PMC9152543
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
864936Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Dudarev, Kamatani, Miyazaki, Enns and Kawahara.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Cognition. 2020 May;198:104193
pubmed: 32018122
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 05;4:594
pubmed: 24046756
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 13;103(24):9369-72
pubmed: 16754871
Vision Res. 2014 Jul;100:105-12
pubmed: 24796509
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 04;11:1918
pubmed: 32849127
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 21;10(1):22344
pubmed: 33349645
Iperception. 2021 Jun 27;12(3):20416695211027920
pubmed: 34262683
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4):
pubmed: 33431650
Psychol Bull. 2002 Mar;128(2):203-35
pubmed: 11931516
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Dec;129(4):559-74
pubmed: 11142869
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):3063-3066
pubmed: 32737790
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1122-1135
pubmed: 25582810
Neuron. 2021 Jun 16;109(12):1918-1920
pubmed: 34139182
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Mar;3(3):e148-e157
pubmed: 33483277
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jun;20(6):676-80
pubmed: 19422630
Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 31;4:11
pubmed: 23382721
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Nov 19;5(1):59
pubmed: 33210257
Qual Soc Work. 2021 Mar;20(1-2):233-239
pubmed: 34253969
Cortex. 2018 May;102:121-138
pubmed: 28863855
Body Image. 2010 Jan;7(1):90-3
pubmed: 19815477
Curr Biol. 2010 Jun 8;20(11):R478-80
pubmed: 20541493
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Apr;75(4):598-615
pubmed: 34289760
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Aug 10;8(8):e3048
pubmed: 32983796
Perception. 2009;38(2):232-41
pubmed: 19400432
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Aug;39(8):1419-1425
pubmed: 32543923
Front Psychol. 2012 Apr 17;3:107
pubmed: 22529828