Investigating the relationship between euthanasia and/or assisted suicide and rates of non-assisted suicide: systematic review.

Psychiatry and law ethics human rights mortality suicide

Journal

BJPsych open
ISSN: 2056-4724
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101667931

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jun 2022
Historique:
entrez: 3 6 2022
pubmed: 4 6 2022
medline: 4 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) are practices that aim to alleviate the suffering of people with life-limiting illnesses, but are controversial. One area of debate is the relationship between EAS and suicide rates in the population, where there have been claims that availability of EAS will reduce the number of self-initiated deaths (EAS and suicide combined). Others claim that legislation for EAS makes it acceptable to end one's own life, a message at variance with that of suicide prevention campaigns. To examine the relationship between the introduction of EAS and rates of non-assisted suicide and self-initiated death. We conducted a systematic review to examine the association between EAS and rates of non-assisted suicide and of self-initiated death. We searched PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO and Science Direct, until 20 December 2021. Studies that examined EAS and reported data on population-based suicide rates were included. Six studies met the inclusion criteria; four reported increases in overall rates of self-initiated death and, in some cases, increased non-assisted suicide. This increase in non-assisted suicide was mostly non-significant when sociodemographic factors were controlled for. Studies from Switzerland and Oregon reported elevated rates of self-initiated death among older women, consistent with higher rates of depressive illnesses in this population. The findings of this review do not support the hypothesis that introducing EAS reduces rates of non-assisted suicide. The disproportionate impact on older women indicates unmet suicide prevention needs in this population.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) are practices that aim to alleviate the suffering of people with life-limiting illnesses, but are controversial. One area of debate is the relationship between EAS and suicide rates in the population, where there have been claims that availability of EAS will reduce the number of self-initiated deaths (EAS and suicide combined). Others claim that legislation for EAS makes it acceptable to end one's own life, a message at variance with that of suicide prevention campaigns.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
To examine the relationship between the introduction of EAS and rates of non-assisted suicide and self-initiated death.
METHOD METHODS
We conducted a systematic review to examine the association between EAS and rates of non-assisted suicide and of self-initiated death. We searched PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO and Science Direct, until 20 December 2021. Studies that examined EAS and reported data on population-based suicide rates were included.
RESULTS RESULTS
Six studies met the inclusion criteria; four reported increases in overall rates of self-initiated death and, in some cases, increased non-assisted suicide. This increase in non-assisted suicide was mostly non-significant when sociodemographic factors were controlled for. Studies from Switzerland and Oregon reported elevated rates of self-initiated death among older women, consistent with higher rates of depressive illnesses in this population.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The findings of this review do not support the hypothesis that introducing EAS reduces rates of non-assisted suicide. The disproportionate impact on older women indicates unmet suicide prevention needs in this population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35656575
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.71
pii: S2056472422000710
pmc: PMC9230443
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

e108

Références

BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m575
pubmed: 32188637
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 23;17(1):203
pubmed: 28641576
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Nov;48(436):1759-63
pubmed: 10198484
Health Soc Work. 1994 Nov;19(4):237-44
pubmed: 7813961
Pain Med. 2011 Jun;12 Suppl 2:S43-8
pubmed: 21668756
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 May;208(5):484-90
pubmed: 26743810
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;10(2):103-21
pubmed: 25702826
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 27;5(7):e007454
pubmed: 26216150
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 19;19(1):74
pubmed: 30782146
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2003 Summer;33(2):192-200
pubmed: 12882420
South Med J. 2015 Oct;108(10):599-604
pubmed: 26437189
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0254203
pubmed: 34242305
Can J Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 21;:7067437221087052
pubmed: 35311599
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013 Sep-Dec;36(5-6):436-43
pubmed: 23830024
J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 15;174:441-6
pubmed: 25553405
Acad Med. 2015 Aug;90(8):1067-76
pubmed: 26107881
Neth J Med. 2016 Nov;74(9):387-394
pubmed: 27905305
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 04;36:100922
pubmed: 34308310
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e108724
pubmed: 25259604
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Oct;19(10):29-39
pubmed: 31557090
Psychol Med. 2020 Jun;50(8):1241-1256
pubmed: 32482180
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;30(2):211-220
pubmed: 34253440
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Jan-Feb;44:54-74
pubmed: 26375452
Eur J Public Health. 2009 Aug;19(4):359-60
pubmed: 19380331
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD007503
pubmed: 20238354
Theor Med Bioeth. 2019 Apr;40(2):123-139
pubmed: 30955151
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Mar;135:153-173
pubmed: 33486164
J Affect Disord. 2019 Dec 1;259:302-313
pubmed: 31450139
BMJ. 2021 Apr 28;373:n1107
pubmed: 33910921
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 1;244:124-154
pubmed: 30340101
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 31;18(1):75
pubmed: 31472690
J Public Health Policy. 2021 Mar;42(1):86-97
pubmed: 32895484
Swiss Med Wkly. 2015 Jun 22;145:w14153
pubmed: 26099005

Auteurs

Anne M Doherty (AM)

School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland.

Caitlyn J Axe (CJ)

School of Bioethics, University of Washington, Washington, USA.

David A Jones (DA)

Department of Bioethics, St Mary's University Twickenham, UK.

Classifications MeSH