Clinical efficacy of Fluorometholone versus Loteprednol eye drops after photorefractive keratectomy: A triple-blinded randomized controlled trial.
densitometry
fluorometholone
loteprednol
photorefractive keratectomy cornea
Journal
European journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1724-6016
Titre abrégé: Eur J Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9110772
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
4
6
2022
medline:
11
1
2023
entrez:
3
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to compare the anti-inflammatory efficacy and safety of 0.1% Fluorometholone (FML) versus (vs.) 0.5% Loteprednol etabonate (LE) following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). A triple-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on both eyes of 100 patients with stable refraction who were candidates for PRK. Both eyes in each subject were randomly allocated to the FML or LE groups. The product to be tested was 0.1% FML eye drops packaged in droppers vs. the 0.5% LE sterile ophthalmic suspension (Lotemax®) packaged in identical droppers. The main clinical outcomes were changes in best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) and corneal optical density. The second clinical outcomes were a change in intraocular pressure (IOP) after the intervention. There was no significant difference regarding mean corneal optical density changes between the two groups, one ( The results of this clinical trial demonstrate that LE and FML treatment was effective with no clinically meaningful effect on IOP following a short course of treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35656757
doi: 10.1177/11206721221106142
doi:
Substances chimiques
Loteprednol Etabonate
YEH1EZ96K6
Fluorometholone
SV0CSG527L
Ophthalmic Solutions
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM