Expected a posteriori scoring in PROMIS
Journal
Journal of patient-reported outcomes
ISSN: 2509-8020
Titre abrégé: J Patient Rep Outcomes
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101722688
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jun 2022
03 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
17
11
2021
accepted:
11
05
2022
entrez:
3
6
2022
pubmed:
4
6
2022
medline:
4
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System This work seeks to provide the reader with a summary and visualization of the operation of Expected A Posteriori scoring, as implemented in PROMIS. As PROMIS is increasingly adopted and implemented, this work will provide a basis for making psychometric methods more accessible to the PROMIS user base.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This work seeks to provide the reader with a summary and visualization of the operation of Expected A Posteriori scoring, as implemented in PROMIS. As PROMIS is increasingly adopted and implemented, this work will provide a basis for making psychometric methods more accessible to the PROMIS user base.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35657454
doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00464-9
pii: 10.1186/s41687-022-00464-9
pmc: PMC9166925
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
59Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S et al (2010) Initial adult health item banks and first wave testing of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS™) network: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol 63(11):1179–1194
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011
Schalet BD, Pilkonis PA, Yu L, Dodds N, Johnston KL, Yount S et al (2016) Clinical validity of PROMIS depression, anxiety, and anger across diverse clinical samples. J Clin Epidemiol 73:119–127
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.036
Cook KF, Jensen SE, Schalet BD, Beaumont JL, Amtmann D, Czajkowski S et al (2016) PROMIS
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.038
Schalet BD, Hays RD, Jensen SE, Beaumont JL, Fries JF, Cella D (2016) Validity of PROMIS physical function measures in diverse clinical samples. J Clin Epidemiol 73:112–118
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.039
Askew RL, Cook KF, Revicki DA, Cella D, Amtmann D (2016) Clinical validity of PROMIS
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.035
Cella D, Lai J-S, Jensen SE, Christodoulou C, Junghaenel DU, Reeve BB et al (2016) PROMIS fatigue item bank had clinical validity across diverse chronic conditions. J Clin Epidemiol 73:128–134
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.037
Hahn EA, Beaumont JL, Pilkonis PA, Garcia SF, Magasi S, DeWalt DA et al (2016) The PROMIS satisfaction with social participation measures demonstrate responsiveness in diverse clinical populations. J Clin Epidemiol 73:135–141
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.034
Reeve B, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Cook KF, Crane PK, Teresi JA et al (2007) Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Med Care 45(5):S22-31
doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04
Stover AM, McLeod LD, Langer MM, Chen W-H, Reeve BB (2019) State of the psychometric methods: patient-reported outcome measure development and refinement using item response theory. J Patient-Rep Outcomes 3(1):1–6
doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0130-5
Rothrock NE, Amtmann D, Cook KF (2020) Development and validation of an interpretive guide for PROMIS scores. J Patient-Rep Outcomes 4(1):16–26
doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-0181-7
Choi S, Schalet B, Cook KF, Cella D (2014) Establishing a common metric for depressive symptoms: linking the BDI-II, CES-d, and PHQ-9 to PROMIS depression. Psychol Assess 26(2):513–527
doi: 10.1037/a0035768
Allaire J, Xie Y, McPherson J, Luraschi J, Ushey K, Atkins A et al (2021) Rmarkdown: dynamic documents for r [Internet]. Available from: https://github.com/rstudio/rmarkdown
Samejima F (1969) Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometric Society, New York
doi: 10.1007/BF03372160
Lord FM, Wingersky MS (1984) Comparison of IRT true-score and equipercentile observed-score “equatings.” Appl Psychol Meas 8(4):453–461
doi: 10.1177/014662168400800409
Bock RD, Mislevy RJ (1982) Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Appl Psychol Meas 6(4):431–444
doi: 10.1177/014662168200600405
Thissen D (2016) Bad questions: an essay involving item response theory. J Educ Behav Stat 41(1):81–89. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998615621300 (Internet)
doi: 10.3102/1076998615621300
Symonds PM (1929) Choice of items for a test on the basis of difficulty. J Educ Psychol 20(7):481–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075650 (Internet)
doi: 10.1037/h0075650
Nguyen TH, Han H-R, Kim MT, Chan KS (2014) An introduction to item response theory for patient-reported outcome measurement. Pat Patient-Cent Outcomes Res 7(1):23–35
doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0041-0
Reeve B, Fayers P (2005) Applying item response theory modelling for evaluating questionnaire item and scale properties. In: Fayers PM, Hays RD (eds) Assessing quality of life in clinical trials: methods and practice, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 55–73
Liu H (2010) Representativeness of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system internet panel. J Clin Epidemiol 63(11):1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.021 (Internet)
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.021
pubmed: 20688473
pmcid: 2943555
Ou J (2021) colorBlindness: safe color set for color blindness [Internet]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=colorBlindness
Chang C-H, Reeve BB (2005) Item response theory and its applications to patient-reported outcomes measurement. Eval Health Prof 28(3):264–282
doi: 10.1177/0163278705278275
Embretson SE, Reise SP (2000) Item response theory for psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
VandenBos GR (2007) APA dictionary of psychology, 1st edn. American Psychological Association, Washington
Bock RD, Aitkin M (1981) Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika 46(4):443–459
doi: 10.1007/BF02293801
Rose M, Bjorner JB, Gandek B, Bruce B, Fries JF, Ware JE (2014) The PROMIS physical function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 67(5):516–526
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.024
Hays R (2017) Two-item PROMIS
doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0003-8
Cai L (2015) Lord–wingersky algorithm version 2.0 for hierarchical item factor models with applications in test scoring, scale alignment, and model fit testing. Psychometrika 80(2):535–559
doi: 10.1007/s11336-014-9411-3
Choi S (2010) ThetaSEeap.r. Version 1
Choi S (2010) RSSS.r. Version 1