Exploring Public Perceptions of Dental Care Affordability in the United States: Mixed Method Analysis via Twitter.
COVID-19
access to care
dental care
dental professional
dental treatment
dentistry
health care service
health communication
health policy
healthcare reform
oral health
public health
social media
thematic analysis
twitter
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2022
01 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
18
01
2022
accepted:
16
05
2022
revised:
16
05
2022
pubmed:
4
6
2022
medline:
4
6
2022
entrez:
3
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dental care expenses are reported to present higher financial barriers than any other type of health care service in the United States. Social media platforms such as Twitter have become a source of public health communication and surveillance. Previous studies have demonstrated the usefulness of Twitter in exploring public opinion on aspects of dental care. To date, no studies have leveraged Twitter to examine public sentiments regarding dental care affordability in the United States. The aim of this study is to understand public perceptions of dental care affordability in the United States on the social media site, Twitter. Tweets posted between September 1, 2017, and September 30, 2021, were collected using the Snscrape application. Query terms were selected a priori to represent dentistry and financial aspects associated with dental treatment. Data were analyzed qualitatively using both deductive and inductive approaches. In total, 8% (440/5500) of all included tweets were coded to identify prominent themes and subthemes. The entire sample of included tweets were then independently coded into thematic categories. Quantitative data analyses included geographic distribution of tweets by state, volume analysis of tweets over time, and distribution of tweets by content theme. A final sample of 5314 tweets were included in the study. Thematic analysis identified the following prominent themes: (1) general sentiments (1614 tweets, 30.4%); (2) delaying or forgoing dental care (1190 tweets, 22.4%); (3) payment strategies (1019 tweets, 19.2%); (4) insurance (767 tweets, 14.4%); and (5) policy statements (724 tweets, 13.6%). Geographic distributions of the tweets established California, Texas, Florida, and New York as the states with the most tweets. Qualitative analysis revealed barriers faced by individuals to accessing dental care, strategies taken to cope with dental pain, and public perceptions on aspects of dental care policy. The volume and thematic trends of the tweets corresponded to relevant societal events, including the COVID-19 pandemic and debates on health care policy resulting from the election of President Joseph R. Biden. The findings illustrate the real-time sentiment of social media users toward the cost of dental treatment and suggest shortcomings in funding that may be representative of greater systemic failures in the provision of dental care. Thus, this study provides insights for policy makers and dental professionals who strive to increase access to dental care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Dental care expenses are reported to present higher financial barriers than any other type of health care service in the United States. Social media platforms such as Twitter have become a source of public health communication and surveillance. Previous studies have demonstrated the usefulness of Twitter in exploring public opinion on aspects of dental care. To date, no studies have leveraged Twitter to examine public sentiments regarding dental care affordability in the United States.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to understand public perceptions of dental care affordability in the United States on the social media site, Twitter.
METHODS
METHODS
Tweets posted between September 1, 2017, and September 30, 2021, were collected using the Snscrape application. Query terms were selected a priori to represent dentistry and financial aspects associated with dental treatment. Data were analyzed qualitatively using both deductive and inductive approaches. In total, 8% (440/5500) of all included tweets were coded to identify prominent themes and subthemes. The entire sample of included tweets were then independently coded into thematic categories. Quantitative data analyses included geographic distribution of tweets by state, volume analysis of tweets over time, and distribution of tweets by content theme.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A final sample of 5314 tweets were included in the study. Thematic analysis identified the following prominent themes: (1) general sentiments (1614 tweets, 30.4%); (2) delaying or forgoing dental care (1190 tweets, 22.4%); (3) payment strategies (1019 tweets, 19.2%); (4) insurance (767 tweets, 14.4%); and (5) policy statements (724 tweets, 13.6%). Geographic distributions of the tweets established California, Texas, Florida, and New York as the states with the most tweets. Qualitative analysis revealed barriers faced by individuals to accessing dental care, strategies taken to cope with dental pain, and public perceptions on aspects of dental care policy. The volume and thematic trends of the tweets corresponded to relevant societal events, including the COVID-19 pandemic and debates on health care policy resulting from the election of President Joseph R. Biden.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The findings illustrate the real-time sentiment of social media users toward the cost of dental treatment and suggest shortcomings in funding that may be representative of greater systemic failures in the provision of dental care. Thus, this study provides insights for policy makers and dental professionals who strive to increase access to dental care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35658090
pii: v6i7e36315
doi: 10.2196/36315
pmc: PMC9288095
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e36315Informations de copyright
©Shahen Yashpal, Ananditha Raghunath, Nihan Gencerliler, Lorel E Burns. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 01.07.2022.
Références
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Aug;51(4):1766-1781
pubmed: 30941697
JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):863-884
pubmed: 32125402
Health Policy. 2020 Sep;124(9):998-1007
pubmed: 32712013
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Dec 1;35(12):2168-2175
pubmed: 27920303
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 29;5(11):e14118
pubmed: 21124761
Int Dent J. 2017 Oct;67(5):272-280
pubmed: 28338226
Int J Public Health. 2019 Apr;64(3):431-440
pubmed: 30585297
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Apr;44(4):244-250
pubmed: 28128466
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Jul;145(7):737-43
pubmed: 24982280
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;108:256-262
pubmed: 34052407
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 Apr 23;4(2):e43
pubmed: 29685871
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jan;107(1):e1-e8
pubmed: 27854532
J Dent Hyg. 2017 Feb;91(1):6-14
pubmed: 29118145
J Dent Res. 2011 Sep;90(9):1047-51
pubmed: 21768306
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 2;385(23):e80
pubmed: 34670037
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Dec;46(12):1375-1380
pubmed: 29929837
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Jul;152(7):535-541.e1
pubmed: 34023093
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 15;22(6):e19981
pubmed: 32501808
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jun 25;70(25):935
pubmed: 34166335
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Apr;38(3):182-8
pubmed: 20347636
Hastings Cent Rep. 2016 Nov;46(6):36-42
pubmed: 27875643
Braz Oral Res. 2020 Sep 04;34:e114
pubmed: 32901729
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Dec 1;35(12):2176-2182
pubmed: 27920304
Int J Pharm Pract. 2021 May 25;29(3):210-217
pubmed: 33880539
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Dec;32(12):2205-15
pubmed: 24226092
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Apr 4;19(Suppl 3):79
pubmed: 30943954
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 May 01;24(3):496-502
pubmed: 27707822