Team Cognition in Handoffs: Relating System Factors, Team Cognition Functions and Outcomes in Two Handoff Processes.

care transitions and handoffs communication and teamwork in health care macroergonomics and the environment system design and analysis team cognition

Journal

Human factors
ISSN: 1547-8181
Titre abrégé: Hum Factors
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374660

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jun 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 7 6 2022
medline: 7 6 2022
entrez: 6 6 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study investigates how team cognition occurs in care transitions from operating room (OR) to intensive care unit (ICU). We then seek to understand how the sociotechnical system and team cognition are related. Effective handoffs are critical to ensuring patient safety and have been the subject of many improvement efforts. However, the types of team-level cognitive processing during handoffs have not been explored, nor is it clear how the sociotechnical system shapes team cognition. We conducted this study in an academic, Level 1 trauma center in the Midwestern United States. Twenty-eight physicians (surgery, anesthesia, pediatric critical care) and nurses (OR, ICU) participated in semi-structured interviews. We performed qualitative content analysis and epistemic network analysis to understand the relationships between system factors, team cognition in handoffs and outcomes. Participants described three team cognition functions in handoffs-(1) information exchange, (2) assessment, and (3) planning and decision making; information exchange was mentioned most. Work system factors influenced team cognition. Inter-professional handoffs facilitated information exchange but included large teams with diverse backgrounds communicating, which can be inefficient. Intra-professional handoffs decreased team size and role diversity, which may simplify communication but increase information loss. Participants in inter-professional handoffs reflected on outcomes significantly more in relation to system factors and team cognition ( Handoffs include team cognition, which was influenced by work system design. Opportunities for handoff improvement include a flexibly standardized process and supportive tools/technologies. We recommend incorporating perspectives of the patient and family in future work.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study investigates how team cognition occurs in care transitions from operating room (OR) to intensive care unit (ICU). We then seek to understand how the sociotechnical system and team cognition are related.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Effective handoffs are critical to ensuring patient safety and have been the subject of many improvement efforts. However, the types of team-level cognitive processing during handoffs have not been explored, nor is it clear how the sociotechnical system shapes team cognition.
METHOD METHODS
We conducted this study in an academic, Level 1 trauma center in the Midwestern United States. Twenty-eight physicians (surgery, anesthesia, pediatric critical care) and nurses (OR, ICU) participated in semi-structured interviews. We performed qualitative content analysis and epistemic network analysis to understand the relationships between system factors, team cognition in handoffs and outcomes.
RESULTS RESULTS
Participants described three team cognition functions in handoffs-(1) information exchange, (2) assessment, and (3) planning and decision making; information exchange was mentioned most. Work system factors influenced team cognition. Inter-professional handoffs facilitated information exchange but included large teams with diverse backgrounds communicating, which can be inefficient. Intra-professional handoffs decreased team size and role diversity, which may simplify communication but increase information loss. Participants in inter-professional handoffs reflected on outcomes significantly more in relation to system factors and team cognition (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Handoffs include team cognition, which was influenced by work system design. Opportunities for handoff improvement include a flexibly standardized process and supportive tools/technologies. We recommend incorporating perspectives of the patient and family in future work.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35658721
doi: 10.1177/00187208221086342
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

187208221086342

Subventions

Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R01 HS023837
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002373
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Auteurs

Abigail R Wooldridge (AR)

Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, 14589University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Pascale Carayon (P)

Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, 5228University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Peter Hoonakker (P)

Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Bat-Zion Hose (BZ)

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care at the Perelman School of Medicine, 14640University of Pennsylvania.

David W Shaffer (DW)

Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Tom Brazelton (T)

5232University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Ben Eithun (B)

5232University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Deborah Rusy (D)

5232University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Joshua Ross (J)

5232University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Jonathan Kohler (J)

12218UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Michelle M Kelly (MM)

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Scott Springman (S)

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Ayse P Gurses (AP)

Center for Health Care Human Factors, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Schools of Medicine, Bloomberg School of Public Health and Whiting School of Engineering, 1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Classifications MeSH