Nudging COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake by Changing the Default: A Randomized Controlled Trial.


Journal

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
ISSN: 1552-681X
Titre abrégé: Med Decis Making
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8109073

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 7 6 2022
medline: 15 7 2022
entrez: 6 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is considered the central strategy against the pandemic, uptake lags behind target rates. To explore whether this rate could be enhanced by a nudging strategy that exploits the status quo bias, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in northern Italy comparing vaccination acceptance among 2000 adults, ages 50 to 59 years, who were either invited to set an appointment (opt-in group) or assigned an individual appointment (opt-out group). Results indicate a difference of 3.2 percentage points, which represents a 32% relative increase in the vaccination rate for the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group. A significant portion of those who remain unvaccinated may not hold strong beliefs against vaccination but rather tend to inaction and may therefore be nudged toward vaccination with a reduction of action required. Reluctant adults (50-59 years), who had not yet received vaccines against COVID-19, were sent letters announcing appointment availabilityIn an RCT, the status quo option in the notices influenced the rate of vaccine acceptanceNudging via pre-scheduled appointments encouraged vaccine uptake more than invitations to schedule didSwitching the default option yielded a 32% relative increase (13.1% vs. 9.9%) in vaccination.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Although vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is considered the central strategy against the pandemic, uptake lags behind target rates.
METHOD
To explore whether this rate could be enhanced by a nudging strategy that exploits the status quo bias, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in northern Italy comparing vaccination acceptance among 2000 adults, ages 50 to 59 years, who were either invited to set an appointment (opt-in group) or assigned an individual appointment (opt-out group).
RESULTS
Results indicate a difference of 3.2 percentage points, which represents a 32% relative increase in the vaccination rate for the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group.
CONCLUSIONS
A significant portion of those who remain unvaccinated may not hold strong beliefs against vaccination but rather tend to inaction and may therefore be nudged toward vaccination with a reduction of action required.
HIGHLIGHTS
Reluctant adults (50-59 years), who had not yet received vaccines against COVID-19, were sent letters announcing appointment availabilityIn an RCT, the status quo option in the notices influenced the rate of vaccine acceptanceNudging via pre-scheduled appointments encouraged vaccine uptake more than invitations to schedule didSwitching the default option yielded a 32% relative increase (13.1% vs. 9.9%) in vaccination.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35658775
doi: 10.1177/0272989X221101536
doi:

Substances chimiques

COVID-19 Vaccines 0
Vaccines 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

837-841

Auteurs

Katya Tentori (K)

Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Centre for Medical Sciences (CISMed), University of Trento, Trento, Italy.

Stefania Pighin (S)

Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.

Giulia Giovanazzi (G)

Provincial Authority for Health Services (APSS), Autonomous Province of Trento, Italy.

Andrea Grignolio (A)

International MD Program, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Interdepartmental Center for Research Ethics and Integrity, National Research Council (CNR).

Benjamin Timberlake (B)

Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.

Antonio Ferro (A)

Provincial Authority for Health Services (APSS), Autonomous Province of Trento, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH