Effectiveness of mRNA vaccine boosters against infection with the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant in Spain: a nationwide cohort study.


Journal

The Lancet. Infectious diseases
ISSN: 1474-4457
Titre abrégé: Lancet Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2022
Historique:
received: 14 02 2022
revised: 06 04 2022
accepted: 12 04 2022
pubmed: 7 6 2022
medline: 31 8 2022
entrez: 6 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 has increased capacity to elude immunity and cause breakthrough infections. The aim of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of mRNA-based vaccine boosters (third dose) against infection with the omicron variant by age, sex, time since complete vaccination, type of primary vaccine, and type of booster. In this nationwide cohort study, we linked data from three nationwide population registries in Spain (Vaccination Registry, Laboratory Results Registry, and National Health System registry) to select community-dwelling individuals aged 40 years or older, who completed their primary vaccine schedule at least 3 months before the start of follow-up, and had not tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 since the start of the pandemic. On each day between Jan 3, and Feb 6, 2022, we matched individuals who received a booster mRNA vaccine and controls of the same sex, age group, postal code, type of vaccine, time since primary vaccination, and number of previous tests. We estimated risk of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared groups using risk ratios (RR) and risk differences. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as one minus RR. Between Jan 3, and Feb 6, 2022, 3 111 159 matched pairs were included in our study. Overall, the estimated effectiveness from day 7 to 34 after a booster was 51·3% (95% CI 50·2-52·4). Estimated effectiveness was 52·5% (51·3-53·7) for an mRNA-1273 booster and 46·2% (43·5-48·7) for a BNT162b2 booster. Effectiveness was 58·6% (55·5-61·6) if primary vaccination had been with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca), 55·3% (52·3-58·2) with mRNA-1273 (Moderna), 49·7% (48·3-51·1) with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), and 48·0% (42·5-53·7) with Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen). Estimated effectiveness was 43·6% (40·0-47·1) when the booster was administered between 151 days and 180 days after complete vaccination and 52·2% (51·0-53·3) if administered more than 180 days after primary scheduled completion. Booster mRNA vaccine-doses were moderately effective in preventing infection with the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 for over a month after administration, which indicates their suitability as a strategy to limit the health effects of COVID-19 in periods of omicron variant domination. Estimated effectiveness was higher for mRNA-1273 compared with BNT162b2 and increased with time between completed primary vaccination and booster. None.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 has increased capacity to elude immunity and cause breakthrough infections. The aim of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of mRNA-based vaccine boosters (third dose) against infection with the omicron variant by age, sex, time since complete vaccination, type of primary vaccine, and type of booster.
METHODS
In this nationwide cohort study, we linked data from three nationwide population registries in Spain (Vaccination Registry, Laboratory Results Registry, and National Health System registry) to select community-dwelling individuals aged 40 years or older, who completed their primary vaccine schedule at least 3 months before the start of follow-up, and had not tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 since the start of the pandemic. On each day between Jan 3, and Feb 6, 2022, we matched individuals who received a booster mRNA vaccine and controls of the same sex, age group, postal code, type of vaccine, time since primary vaccination, and number of previous tests. We estimated risk of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared groups using risk ratios (RR) and risk differences. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as one minus RR.
FINDINGS
Between Jan 3, and Feb 6, 2022, 3 111 159 matched pairs were included in our study. Overall, the estimated effectiveness from day 7 to 34 after a booster was 51·3% (95% CI 50·2-52·4). Estimated effectiveness was 52·5% (51·3-53·7) for an mRNA-1273 booster and 46·2% (43·5-48·7) for a BNT162b2 booster. Effectiveness was 58·6% (55·5-61·6) if primary vaccination had been with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca), 55·3% (52·3-58·2) with mRNA-1273 (Moderna), 49·7% (48·3-51·1) with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), and 48·0% (42·5-53·7) with Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen). Estimated effectiveness was 43·6% (40·0-47·1) when the booster was administered between 151 days and 180 days after complete vaccination and 52·2% (51·0-53·3) if administered more than 180 days after primary scheduled completion.
INTERPRETATION
Booster mRNA vaccine-doses were moderately effective in preventing infection with the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 for over a month after administration, which indicates their suitability as a strategy to limit the health effects of COVID-19 in periods of omicron variant domination. Estimated effectiveness was higher for mRNA-1273 compared with BNT162b2 and increased with time between completed primary vaccination and booster.
FUNDING
None.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35658998
pii: S1473-3099(22)00292-4
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00292-4
pmc: PMC9162477
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Ad26COVS1 JT2NS6183B
Vaccines, Synthetic 0
mRNA Vaccines 0
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 B5S3K2V0G8
BNT162 Vaccine N38TVC63NU

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1313-1320

Investigateurs

David Moreno (D)
Manuel Méndez Díaz (M)
Ismael Huerta González (I)
Antònia Galmés Truyols (A)
Ana Barreno Estévez (A)
Valvanuz García Velasco (V)
Mª Jesús Rodríguez Recio (MJ)
José Sacristán (J)
Montserrat Martínez Marcos (M)
Eliseo Pastor Villalba (E)
María José Macías Ortiz (MJ)
Ana García Vallejo (A)
Amaya Sánchez Gómez (A)
Rocío García Pina (R)
Aurelio Barricarte Gurea (A)
Rosa Sancho Martínez (R)
Eva María Ochoa (EM)
Mauricio Vázquez Cantero (M)
Atanasio Gómez Anés (A)
María Jesús Pareja Megía (MJ)
Yolanda Castán (Y)
Manuel Roberto Fonseca Álvarez (MR)
Antonia Salvà Fiol (A)
Hilda Sánchez Janáriz (H)
Luz López Arce (L)
María Ángeles Cisneros Martín (MÁ)
Frederic Jose Gibernau (FJ)
Cesar Fernandez Buey (C)
Katja Villatoro Bongiorno (K)
Francisco Javier Rubio García (FJ)
Fernando Santos Guerra (F)
Jenaro Astray Mochales (J)
Francisco Javier Francisco Verdu (FJ)
Isabel García Romero (I)
Rosa Oriza Bernal (R)
Tomás Gómez Pérez (T)
Salomé Hijano Villegas (S)
Sergio Román Soto (S)
Diana Gómez-Barroso (D)
María Fé Lapeña (MF)
Virgilio Yagüe Galaup (V)
Mercedes Alfaro Latorre (M)
Marta Aguilera Guzmán (M)
Belén Crespo Sánchez-Eznarriaga (B)
Montserrat Neira León (M)
Noemí Cívicos Villa (N)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests We declare no competing interest.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 3;386(5):494-496
pubmed: 34965358
Nature. 2022 Feb;602(7898):671-675
pubmed: 35016199
BMJ. 2021 Nov 24;375:e067873
pubmed: 34819275
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 17;386(11):1046-1057
pubmed: 35081293
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1761-1773
pubmed: 34525277
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2025-2031
pubmed: 34526698
N Engl J Med. 2022 May 12;386(19):1804-1816
pubmed: 35263534
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2232760
pubmed: 36136332
Nat Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):831-837
pubmed: 35045566
Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2258-2276
pubmed: 34863358
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):477-480
pubmed: 35046572
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 21;71(4):139-145
pubmed: 35085224
Nat Med. 2022 May;28(5):1063-1071
pubmed: 35189624
Lancet. 2021 Oct 16;398(10309):1407-1416
pubmed: 34619098
JAMA. 2022 Feb 15;327(7):639-651
pubmed: 35060999
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Feb 18;71(7):255-263
pubmed: 35176007
Lancet. 2021 Dec 4;398(10316):2093-2100
pubmed: 34756184
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jul;22(7):959-966
pubmed: 35468332
Lancet. 2022 Feb 19;399(10326):715-717
pubmed: 35065005
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 7;385(15):1393-1400
pubmed: 34525275
Cell. 2022 Feb 3;185(3):457-466.e4
pubmed: 34995482

Auteurs

Susana Monge (S)

Department of Communicable Diseases, National Centre of Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) on Infectious Diseases, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: smonge@isciii.es.

Ayelén Rojas-Benedicto (A)

Department of Communicable Diseases, National Centre of Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; CIBER on Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain; National Distance Education University, Madrid, Spain.

Carmen Olmedo (C)

Vaccines Division, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain.

Clara Mazagatos (C)

Department of Communicable Diseases, National Centre of Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; CIBER on Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain.

María José Sierra (M)

Centre for the Coordination of Heath Alerts and Emergencies, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain.

Aurora Limia (A)

Vaccines Division, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain.

Elisa Martín-Merino (E)

Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices, Madrid, Spain.

Amparo Larrauri (A)

Department of Communicable Diseases, National Centre of Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; CIBER on Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain.

Miguel A Hernán (MA)

CAUSALab and Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH