Motivators and demotivators to accessing malaria in pregnancy interventions in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-ethnographic review.
Community
De(motivators)
Environment
Health system
Individual
Interventions
Malaria in pregnancy
Socio-cultural
Sub-Saharan Africa
Journal
Malaria journal
ISSN: 1475-2875
Titre abrégé: Malar J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jun 2022
03 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
11
02
2022
accepted:
25
05
2022
entrez:
6
6
2022
pubmed:
7
6
2022
medline:
9
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the introduction of efficacious interventions for malaria control, sub-Saharan Africa continues to bear the highest burden of malaria and its associated effects on vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women and children. This meta-ethnographic review contributes to literature on malaria in pregnancy interventions in sub-Saharan Africa by offering insights into the multiple factors that motivate or demotivate women from accessing MiP interventions. A meta-ethnographic approach was used for the synthesis. Original qualitative research articles published from 2010 to November 2021 in English in sub-Saharan Africa were searched for. Articles focusing on WHO's recommended interventions such as intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, long-lasting insecticidal nets and testing and treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy (MiP) were included. Selected articles were uploaded into Nvivo 11 for thematic coding and synthesis. Twenty-seven original qualitative research articles were included in the analysis. Main factors motivating uptake of MiP interventions were: (1) well organized ANC, positive attitudes of health workers and availability of MiP services; (2) Women's knowledge of the effects of malaria in pregnancy, previous experience of accessing responsive ANC; (3) financial resources and encouragement from partners, relatives and friends and (4) favourable weather condition and nearness to a health facility. Factors that demotivated women from using MiP services were: (1) stock-outs, ANC charges and health providers failure to provide women with ample education on the need for MiP care; (2) perception of not being at risk and the culture of self-medication; (3) fear of being bewitched if pregnancy was noticed early, women's lack of decision-making power and dependence on traditional remedies and (4) warm weather, long distances to health facilities and the style of construction of houses making it difficult to hang LLINs. Health system gaps need to be strengthened in order to ensure that MiP interventions become accessible to women. Additionally, health managers need to involve communities in planning, designing and implementing malaria interventions for pregnant women. It is important that the health system engage extensively with communities to facilitate pregnant women and communities understanding of MiP interventions and the need to support pregnant women to access them.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite the introduction of efficacious interventions for malaria control, sub-Saharan Africa continues to bear the highest burden of malaria and its associated effects on vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women and children. This meta-ethnographic review contributes to literature on malaria in pregnancy interventions in sub-Saharan Africa by offering insights into the multiple factors that motivate or demotivate women from accessing MiP interventions.
METHODS
METHODS
A meta-ethnographic approach was used for the synthesis. Original qualitative research articles published from 2010 to November 2021 in English in sub-Saharan Africa were searched for. Articles focusing on WHO's recommended interventions such as intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, long-lasting insecticidal nets and testing and treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy (MiP) were included. Selected articles were uploaded into Nvivo 11 for thematic coding and synthesis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-seven original qualitative research articles were included in the analysis. Main factors motivating uptake of MiP interventions were: (1) well organized ANC, positive attitudes of health workers and availability of MiP services; (2) Women's knowledge of the effects of malaria in pregnancy, previous experience of accessing responsive ANC; (3) financial resources and encouragement from partners, relatives and friends and (4) favourable weather condition and nearness to a health facility. Factors that demotivated women from using MiP services were: (1) stock-outs, ANC charges and health providers failure to provide women with ample education on the need for MiP care; (2) perception of not being at risk and the culture of self-medication; (3) fear of being bewitched if pregnancy was noticed early, women's lack of decision-making power and dependence on traditional remedies and (4) warm weather, long distances to health facilities and the style of construction of houses making it difficult to hang LLINs.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Health system gaps need to be strengthened in order to ensure that MiP interventions become accessible to women. Additionally, health managers need to involve communities in planning, designing and implementing malaria interventions for pregnant women. It is important that the health system engage extensively with communities to facilitate pregnant women and communities understanding of MiP interventions and the need to support pregnant women to access them.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35659232
doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04205-7
pii: 10.1186/s12936-022-04205-7
pmc: PMC9166609
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antimalarials
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
170Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : WT: 107741/A/15/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0119848
pubmed: 25798847
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 May 07;9 Suppl 1:S7
pubmed: 19426470
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 20;19(1):424
pubmed: 31747927
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Apr;54(8):1255-66
pubmed: 11989961
Malar J. 2014 Nov 20;13:440
pubmed: 25409680
Malar J. 2016 Apr 11;15:195
pubmed: 27068760
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 13;14:15
pubmed: 24410770
PLoS Med. 2007 Apr;4(4):e92
pubmed: 17411326
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Apr 20;18(1):108
pubmed: 29678150
Malar J. 2015 Aug 15;14:316
pubmed: 26272067
Afr J Reprod Health. 2015 Mar;19(1):44-53
pubmed: 26103694
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Oct;7(4):209-15
pubmed: 12425780
Malar J. 2016 Nov 4;15(1):533
pubmed: 27814763
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 7;16(10):e0257666
pubmed: 34618812
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Sep 21;13:178
pubmed: 24053142
PLoS Med. 2013;10(7):e1001488
pubmed: 23935459
Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 15;5:44
pubmed: 26979748
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 22;5(3):
pubmed: 32842592
PLoS Med. 2014 Aug 05;11(8):e1001688
pubmed: 25093720
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 03;8(7):e65437
pubmed: 23843941
Malar J. 2011 Aug 05;10:227
pubmed: 21819579
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):220
pubmed: 33740908
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 29;11(10):e047606
pubmed: 34716158
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Apr 16;8:21
pubmed: 18416812
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0248412
pubmed: 33720947
Int Health. 2012 Mar;4(1):10-9
pubmed: 24030876
Malar J. 2013 Sep 23;12:342
pubmed: 24059757
Malar J. 2008 May 09;7:79
pubmed: 18471279
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22452
pubmed: 21799859
Nurse Res. 2008;15(2):59-71
pubmed: 18283763
Malar J. 2013 Oct 03;12:353
pubmed: 24090252
Malar Res Treat. 2017;2017:7481210
pubmed: 28828192
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 24;14(1):e0203740
pubmed: 30677039
Malar J. 2010 Oct 12;9:279
pubmed: 20937157
Malar J. 2016 Nov 4;15(1):530
pubmed: 27809918
Malar J. 2018 May 18;17(1):207
pubmed: 29776369
J Health Popul Nutr. 2015 Nov 18;33:22
pubmed: 26825570
Malar J. 2016 Jul 04;15(1):341
pubmed: 27377538
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 03;9(2):e86038
pubmed: 24498268
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 27;12(10):e1001895
pubmed: 26506244
PLoS One. 2014 May 19;9(5):e93025
pubmed: 24842484
Malar J. 2016 Mar 12;15:158
pubmed: 26968167
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011 Nov;20(6):708-19
pubmed: 21933291
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 02;14:452
pubmed: 25277956
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27 Suppl 4:iv32-43
pubmed: 23014151
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Oct 10;9(1):460
pubmed: 27724980
Malar J. 2019 Jul 9;18(1):229
pubmed: 31288835
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 14;8(6):e64913
pubmed: 23798997
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0119077
pubmed: 25893405
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Mar 13;30(2):148-159
pubmed: 28256926
Malar J. 2010 Feb 17;9:54
pubmed: 20163707
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Oct;20(5):346-51
pubmed: 18621778
Popul Health Metr. 2021 Feb 8;19(Suppl 1):15
pubmed: 33557858
Malar J. 2014 Jan 14;13:22
pubmed: 24423279
Malar J. 2012 Mar 23;11:82
pubmed: 22443266
Malar J. 2008 Jul 22;7:135
pubmed: 18647404
Malar J. 2008 Jul 21;7:133
pubmed: 18644118
Malar J. 2019 Nov 12;18(1):363
pubmed: 31718677
Malar J. 2020 Sep 25;19(1):347
pubmed: 32977827
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Oct 10;28:122
pubmed: 29515740
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 29;15:354
pubmed: 26318623
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 5;18(1):394
pubmed: 30290769
Malar J. 2013 Nov 20;12:427
pubmed: 24257105
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 05;11(8):e0160008
pubmed: 27494250
Afr J Reprod Health. 2010 Mar;14(1):117-28
pubmed: 20695144
Malar J. 2011 Aug 16;10:240
pubmed: 21846368
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Jul 09;9:28
pubmed: 19589164
Malar J. 2012 Sep 07;11:317
pubmed: 22958539
BMC Public Health. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):794
pubmed: 29017472
Malar J. 2014 Jun 03;13:212
pubmed: 24888703