Existing Ethical Tensions in Xenotransplantation.
COVID-19
animal well-being
research ethics
xenotransplantation
zoonotic disease
Journal
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees
ISSN: 1469-2147
Titre abrégé: Camb Q Healthc Ethics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9208482
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
7
6
2022
medline:
30
7
2022
entrez:
6
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The genetic modification of pigs as a source of transplantable organs is one of several possible solutions to the chronic organ shortage. This paper describes existing ethical tensions in xenotransplantation (XTx) that argue against pursuing it. Recommendations for lifelong infectious disease surveillance and notification of close contacts of recipients are in tension with the rights of human research subjects. Parental/guardian consent for pediatric xenograft recipients is in tension with a child's right to an open future. Individual consent to transplant is in tension with public health threats that include zoonotic diseases. XTx amplifies concerns about justice in organ transplantation and could exacerbate existing inequities. The prevention of infectious disease in source animals is in tension with the best practices of animal care and animal welfare, requiring isolation, ethologically inappropriate housing, and invasive reproductive procedures that would severely impact the well-being of intelligent social creatures like pigs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35659820
doi: 10.1017/S0963180121001055
pii: S0963180121001055
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM