Students With High Metacognition Are Favourable Towards Individualism When Anxious.

anxiety metacognition problem-solving social interdependence virtual classroom

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 31 03 2022
accepted: 27 04 2022
entrez: 6 6 2022
pubmed: 7 6 2022
medline: 7 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Metacognitive ability has been described as an important predictor of several processes involved in learning, including problem-solving. Although this relationship is fairly documented, little is known about the mechanisms that could modulate it. Given its relationship with both constructs, we decided to evaluate the impact of self-knowledge on PS. In addition, we inspected whether emotional (self-reported anxiety) and interpersonal (attitudes towards social interdependence) variables could affect the relationship between metacognition and problem-solving. We tested a sample of 32 undergraduate students and used behavioural tasks and self-report questionnaires. Contrary to the literature, we found no significant relationship between metacognition and problem-solving performance, nor a significant moderating effect when including emotional and interpersonal variables in the model. In contrast, we observed a significant moderating model combining metacognition, self-reported anxiety and attitudes towards social interdependence. It was found that participants with high metacognition reported attitudes unfavourable towards interdependence when they felt high anxiety. These results suggest that already anxious individuals with high metacognition would prefer to work alone rather than with others, as a coping mechanism against further anxiety derived from cooperation. We hypothesise that in anxiogenic contexts, metacognition is used as a tool to compare possible threats with one's own skills and act accordingly, in order to maximise one's own performance. Further studies are needed to understand how metacognition works in contexts adverse to learning.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35664137
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910132
pmc: PMC9158479
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

910132

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Barrientos, Valenzuela, Hojman and Reyes.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Psychol Res. 2022 Apr;86(3):1001-1013
pubmed: 34008046
Brain. 2014 Oct;137(Pt 10):2811-22
pubmed: 25100039
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 26;11:543
pubmed: 32292371
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70
pubmed: 3397865
Personal Neurosci. 2018 Aug 10;1:
pubmed: 30411087
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2018 Dec;2018(162):11-39
pubmed: 30411847
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Oct;23:117-123
pubmed: 29597145
Cognition. 2022 Feb;219:104946
pubmed: 34891110
NPJ Sci Learn. 2021 Jun 8;6(1):13
pubmed: 34103531
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 07;10(8):e0132320
pubmed: 26252222
Science. 2010 Sep 17;329(5998):1541-3
pubmed: 20847276
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Mar;21(1):422-30
pubmed: 22071269
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203
pubmed: 30734206
Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;19(11):1110-7
pubmed: 19076482
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 15;8:443
pubmed: 25076880
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Aug 16;4(8):170193
pubmed: 28878973
Vision Res. 1998 Jun;38(12):1861-81
pubmed: 9797963
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Nov;17(6):1746-1765
pubmed: 35839099
Mem Cognit. 1987 May;15(3):238-46
pubmed: 3600264
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 10;16(2):e0246676
pubmed: 33566824
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Sep;74(9):1605-1614
pubmed: 33719763
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 May;42(3):313-24
pubmed: 26990809
Neuroimage. 2020 Mar;208:116407
pubmed: 31809888
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2213-23
pubmed: 22734064
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 24;10(1):14100
pubmed: 32839468
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 26;16(7):e0255041
pubmed: 34310649
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Mar;19(3):468-78
pubmed: 17335395
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(9):1318-28
pubmed: 15949516
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):186-93
pubmed: 24582436
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Sep;92:318-337
pubmed: 29944961

Auteurs

Mauricio S Barrientos (MS)

Cognitive Science Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

Pilar Valenzuela (P)

Faculty of Psychology, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

Viviana Hojman (V)

Faculty of Psychology, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

Gabriel Reyes (G)

Cognitive Science Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

Classifications MeSH