Real-World Therapy Management and Outcomes of First-Line Axitinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States.
axitinib
combination
real-world
renal cell carcinoma
therapy management
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
24
01
2022
accepted:
21
03
2022
entrez:
6
6
2022
pubmed:
7
6
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Combination axitinib plus pembrolizumab is a standard of care in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This analysis describes the clinical characteristics, treatment management and outcomes of patients receiving first-line (1L) axitinib plus pembrolizumab in a real-world US setting. Electronic health record (EHR)-derived data from the Flatiron Health Database, which includes ~280 cancer clinics across 800 sites in the US, were used. Patients had confirmed Stage IV or metastatic RCC and initiated 1L axitinib plus pembrolizumab on or after 1/1/2018 to 3/31/2021. Outcomes were best overall response rate; real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) at landmark time periods (3, 6, 9, and 12 months). Therapy management (TM) included dose hold, dose change and discontinuation. Data are reported as medians (IQR) unless otherwise noted. 355 patients received 1L axitinib plus pembrolizumab, with median follow-up of 9.7 (0.1-24.3) months. IMDC Risk Score was favorable, intermediate, and poor in 27 (7.6%), 126 (35.5%), and 76 (21.4%) patients, respectively (23.4% intermediate/poor, 12.1% unknown). 270 patients (76.1%) received only 1L axitinib plus pembrolizumab and 85 patients (24.3%) received ≥1 subsequent line of treatment; cabozantinib was the most frequent subsequent line of treatment (47.9%). rwPFS at 3 months and 1 year was 77.2% and 39.3%, respectively. OS ranged from 90.8% at 3 months to 73.5% at 1 year. Best overall response rate was 47.9%. Toxicity was the most common reason for first TM events of dose hold, change and discontinuation at, 58.6%, 58.5%, and 45.8%, respectively. Over 80% of patients with TM were able to continue with 1L axitinib plus pembrolizumab. In a real-world setting, axitinib plus pembrolizumab was effective as a 1L treatment for patients with advanced RCC. Dose holds, changes and discontinuation were driven by treatment-related toxicity. Dose holds may represent an effective TM strategy to toxicity.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Combination axitinib plus pembrolizumab is a standard of care in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This analysis describes the clinical characteristics, treatment management and outcomes of patients receiving first-line (1L) axitinib plus pembrolizumab in a real-world US setting.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Electronic health record (EHR)-derived data from the Flatiron Health Database, which includes ~280 cancer clinics across 800 sites in the US, were used. Patients had confirmed Stage IV or metastatic RCC and initiated 1L axitinib plus pembrolizumab on or after 1/1/2018 to 3/31/2021. Outcomes were best overall response rate; real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) at landmark time periods (3, 6, 9, and 12 months). Therapy management (TM) included dose hold, dose change and discontinuation. Data are reported as medians (IQR) unless otherwise noted.
Results
UNASSIGNED
355 patients received 1L axitinib plus pembrolizumab, with median follow-up of 9.7 (0.1-24.3) months. IMDC Risk Score was favorable, intermediate, and poor in 27 (7.6%), 126 (35.5%), and 76 (21.4%) patients, respectively (23.4% intermediate/poor, 12.1% unknown). 270 patients (76.1%) received only 1L axitinib plus pembrolizumab and 85 patients (24.3%) received ≥1 subsequent line of treatment; cabozantinib was the most frequent subsequent line of treatment (47.9%). rwPFS at 3 months and 1 year was 77.2% and 39.3%, respectively. OS ranged from 90.8% at 3 months to 73.5% at 1 year. Best overall response rate was 47.9%. Toxicity was the most common reason for first TM events of dose hold, change and discontinuation at, 58.6%, 58.5%, and 45.8%, respectively. Over 80% of patients with TM were able to continue with 1L axitinib plus pembrolizumab.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
In a real-world setting, axitinib plus pembrolizumab was effective as a 1L treatment for patients with advanced RCC. Dose holds, changes and discontinuation were driven by treatment-related toxicity. Dose holds may represent an effective TM strategy to toxicity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35664758
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.861189
pmc: PMC9161634
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
861189Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Zakharia, Thomaidou, Li, Siu, Levin, Vlahiotis, Rao and Zanotti.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that this study received funding from Pfizer Inc. RL, BL, GS, GZ, DT, AV, and DR were employees of Pfizer Inc. The funder had the following involvement with the study: Pfizer-affiliated authors were involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, and the decision to submit it for publication. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 4;384(9):829-841
pubmed: 33657295
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 8;384(14):1289-1300
pubmed: 33616314
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1116-1127
pubmed: 30779529
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 05;378(14):1277-1290
pubmed: 29562145
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Nov;14(12):1233-42
pubmed: 24140184
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):85-97
pubmed: 24857407
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Feb;14(2):141-8
pubmed: 23312463
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 1;20(1):289-96
pubmed: 11773181
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;39(1):94-6
pubmed: 19776246
Br J Cancer. 2020 Sep;123(6):898-904
pubmed: 32587360
ESMO Open. 2020 Nov;5(6):e001079
pubmed: 33246931
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Nov;11(6):491-7
pubmed: 26330533
Ann Oncol. 2014 Jan;25(1):149-54
pubmed: 24356626
Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):615-21
pubmed: 21741761
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Dec;21(12):1563-1573
pubmed: 33284113
Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):706-720
pubmed: 30788497