Rothmund-Thomson syndrome type 1 caused by biallelic ANAPC1 gene mutations.
Journal
Skin health and disease
ISSN: 2690-442X
Titre abrégé: Skin Health Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918227353706676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
05
12
2020
revised:
18
12
2020
accepted:
26
12
2020
entrez:
6
6
2022
pubmed:
12
2
2021
medline:
12
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rare syndromic skin disorders may represent a diagnostic challenge. We report a unique case associating cutaneous manifestations and developmental delay. The affected 14 months old boy had poikiloderma, facial dysmorphism with deep-set eyes, atrichia, as well as nail dysplasia and non-descended testes. In addition, his psychomotor development was delayed. Exome sequencing and molecular karyotyping via array-CGH (oligo-array, 180k Agilent, design 22060) were performed. Mutations in RECQL4 (found in patients with RTS2) were first excluded. In the ANAPC1 gene, a novel combination of a recurrent intronic mutation (c.2705-198C>T) and a deletion of the second ANAPC1 allele was detected, thus confirming the clinical diagnosis of RTS1. The deletion on chromosome 2q13 comprised further genes and spanned 1,7 megabases. Heterozygous deletions in this region are known as 2q13 microdeletion syndrome and are associated with developmental delay, autism and facial dysmorphism. The genetic findings most probably explain both, the RTS1 features and the developmental delay. Genetic diagnosis in RTS is indispensable to confirm the specific subtype and its associated risks: juvenile cataracts are features of RTS1 (ANAPC1 gene), whereas a high risk of osteosarcoma is part of RTS2 (RECQL4 gene). Thus, the patient described here is at high risk for the development of juvenile cataracts and requires regular ophthalmologic examination. This case report underlines the necessity of thorough clinical diagnosis prior to genetic diagnosis of RTS1, since the recurrent intronic ANAPC1 mutation is otherwise missed.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Rare syndromic skin disorders may represent a diagnostic challenge.
Aims
UNASSIGNED
We report a unique case associating cutaneous manifestations and developmental delay.
Materials & Methods
UNASSIGNED
The affected 14 months old boy had poikiloderma, facial dysmorphism with deep-set eyes, atrichia, as well as nail dysplasia and non-descended testes. In addition, his psychomotor development was delayed. Exome sequencing and molecular karyotyping via array-CGH (oligo-array, 180k Agilent, design 22060) were performed.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Mutations in RECQL4 (found in patients with RTS2) were first excluded. In the ANAPC1 gene, a novel combination of a recurrent intronic mutation (c.2705-198C>T) and a deletion of the second ANAPC1 allele was detected, thus confirming the clinical diagnosis of RTS1. The deletion on chromosome 2q13 comprised further genes and spanned 1,7 megabases. Heterozygous deletions in this region are known as 2q13 microdeletion syndrome and are associated with developmental delay, autism and facial dysmorphism.
Discussion
UNASSIGNED
The genetic findings most probably explain both, the RTS1 features and the developmental delay. Genetic diagnosis in RTS is indispensable to confirm the specific subtype and its associated risks: juvenile cataracts are features of RTS1 (ANAPC1 gene), whereas a high risk of osteosarcoma is part of RTS2 (RECQL4 gene). Thus, the patient described here is at high risk for the development of juvenile cataracts and requires regular ophthalmologic examination.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
This case report underlines the necessity of thorough clinical diagnosis prior to genetic diagnosis of RTS1, since the recurrent intronic ANAPC1 mutation is otherwise missed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35664819
doi: 10.1002/ski2.12
pii: SKI212
pmc: PMC9060067
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
e12Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Skin Health and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
Références
Mol Cytogenet. 2015 Jul 31;8:57
pubmed: 26236398
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Sep 5;105(3):625-630
pubmed: 31303264
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1258:37-54
pubmed: 32767233
Nat Genet. 1999 May;22(1):82-4
pubmed: 10319867
Life Sci Alliance. 2019 Feb 4;2(1):
pubmed: 30718377