Quantifying sodium [
Aneurysms
Image analysis
Positron emission tomography
Radiotracer
Journal
EJNMMI research
ISSN: 2191-219X
Titre abrégé: EJNMMI Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101560946
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jun 2022
06 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
07
03
2022
accepted:
25
05
2022
entrez:
6
6
2022
pubmed:
7
6
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Aortic microcalcification activity is a recently described method of measuring aortic sodium [ Twenty-five patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent an sodium [ The aortic microcalcification activity method was much quicker to perform than the TBR method (14 versus 40 min, p < 0.001). There was moderate-to-good agreement between TBR and aortic microcalcification activity measurements for maximum (interclass correlation co-efficient, 0.67) and mean (interclass correlation co-efficient, 0.88) values. These correlations sequentially improved with the application of thresholding (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.95) and variable diameter (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99) techniques. The optimised method had good intra-observer (mean 1.57 ± 0.42, bias 0.08, co-efficient of repeatability 0.36 and limits of agreement - 0.43 to 0.43) and inter-observer (mean 1.57 ± 0.42, bias 0.08, co-efficient of repeatability 0.47 and limits of agreement - 0.53 to 0.53) repeatability. Aortic microcalcification activity is a quick and simple method which demonstrates good intra-observer and inter-observer repeatabilities and provides measures of sodium [
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Aortic microcalcification activity is a recently described method of measuring aortic sodium [
METHODS
METHODS
Twenty-five patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent an sodium [
RESULTS
RESULTS
The aortic microcalcification activity method was much quicker to perform than the TBR method (14 versus 40 min, p < 0.001). There was moderate-to-good agreement between TBR and aortic microcalcification activity measurements for maximum (interclass correlation co-efficient, 0.67) and mean (interclass correlation co-efficient, 0.88) values. These correlations sequentially improved with the application of thresholding (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.95) and variable diameter (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99) techniques. The optimised method had good intra-observer (mean 1.57 ± 0.42, bias 0.08, co-efficient of repeatability 0.36 and limits of agreement - 0.43 to 0.43) and inter-observer (mean 1.57 ± 0.42, bias 0.08, co-efficient of repeatability 0.47 and limits of agreement - 0.53 to 0.53) repeatability.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Aortic microcalcification activity is a quick and simple method which demonstrates good intra-observer and inter-observer repeatabilities and provides measures of sodium [
Identifiants
pubmed: 35666397
doi: 10.1186/s13550-022-00904-z
pii: 10.1186/s13550-022-00904-z
pmc: PMC9170850
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
33Subventions
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : CH/09/002/26360
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0701127
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/14/78/31020
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/21/10461
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/ICRF/20/26002
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/18/31/33676
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
Nat Commun. 2015 Jul 07;6:7495
pubmed: 26151378
Br J Radiol. 2019 Nov;92(1103):20180309
pubmed: 31502858
Circulation. 2007 Jan 23;115(3):377-86
pubmed: 17224478
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020 Jul;40(7):1620-1626
pubmed: 32375543
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Aug 27;4(9):e001956
pubmed: 26316523
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Feb 06;71(5):513-523
pubmed: 29406857
Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1547-59
pubmed: 21908036
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 09;8(9):e73990
pubmed: 24040139
Lancet. 2014 Feb 22;383(9918):705-13
pubmed: 24224999
EJNMMI Phys. 2018 Dec 5;5(1):34
pubmed: 30519974
J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Oct;28(5):1875-1886
pubmed: 31721093
Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2007 Oct 1;580(2):968-970
pubmed: 18836514
J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Jun;29(3):1372-1385
pubmed: 33474695
J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Jun;27(3):962-972
pubmed: 30499069
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Mar;10(3):
pubmed: 28292859
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Oct;9(10):
pubmed: 27733431