Impact of Methotrexate Discontinuation, Interruption, or Persistence in US Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating Tofacitinib + Oral Methotrexate Combination.
Conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
Registry
Rheumatoid arthritis
tofacitinib
Journal
Clinical therapeutics
ISSN: 1879-114X
Titre abrégé: Clin Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7706726
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
09
08
2021
revised:
22
03
2022
accepted:
04
05
2022
pubmed:
7
6
2022
medline:
14
9
2022
entrez:
6
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Using data from real-world practice, this analysis compared outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating treatment with an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, tofacitinib, in combination with persistent, discontinued, or interrupted treatment with oral methotrexate (MTX). This retrospective claims analysis (MarketScan® databases) included data from US patients with RA and at least one prescription claim for tofacitinib, dated between January 1, 2013, and April 30, 2017. Eligible patients were continuously enrolled for ≥12 months before and after treatment initiation, and initiated tofacitinib in combination with oral MTX, with at least two prescription claims for each. Patients were grouped according to treatment pattern (MTX-Persistent, MTX-Discontinued, or MTX-Interrupted). Tofacitinib treatment persistence, adherence, and effectiveness, as well as all-cause and RA-related health care costs, were assessed. A total of 671 patients were eligible for inclusion; 504 (75.1%) were MTX-Persistent; 131 (19.5%), MTX-Discontinued; and 36 (5.4%), MTX-Interrupted. Rates of tofacitinib treatment persistence, adherence, and effectiveness at 12 months were similar between the MTX-Persistent and MTX-Discontinued cohorts. The percentage of patients switched from tofacitinib to another advanced disease-modifying antirheumatic drug within 12 months of tofacitinib initiation was greater in the MTX-Persistent cohort compared with that in the MTX-Discontinued cohort. RA-related health care costs at 12 months post-initiation were significantly greater in the MTX-Persistent cohort compared with those in the MTX-Discontinued cohort. The findings from this analysis of real-world data indicate that patients who initiate tofacitinib in combination with oral MTX may discontinue MTX and still experience outcomes similar to those in patients who persist with MTX, with lesser RA-related health care costs. These results support those from a previous clinical study on methotrexate withdrawal in patients with RA (NCT02831855).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35667900
pii: S0149-2918(22)00153-9
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.05.002
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Piperidines
0
Pyrimidines
0
tofacitinib
87LA6FU830
Methotrexate
YL5FZ2Y5U1
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02831855']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
982-997.e2Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Prof. Cohen has received research grants, consulting fees, or other remuneration from Pfizer Inc. Dr. Haraoui has received research grants from AbbVie; consultant's fees or other remuneration from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Pfizer Inc, and UCB; and has participated in speakers' bureaus for Amgen, Pfizer Inc, and UCB. Dr. Curtis has received research grants, consultant's fees, or other remuneration from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CorEvitas LLC (formerly Corrona LLC), Eli Lilly, Janssen, Myriad, Pfizer Inc, Radius, Roche, and UCB. Drs. Woolcott and Gruben are employees of, and hold stock options in, Pfizer Inc. Drs. Smith and Murray were employees of Pfizer Inc at the time of this analysis. The authors have indicated that they have no other conflicts of interest with regard to the content of this article.