Regulating clinical trials in a resource-limited setting during the Ebola public health emergency in Sierra Leone.
Clinical trial
Diagnostics
Ebola
Expert committee
Medicine regulatory authority
Sierra Leone
Therapeutics
Vaccines
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jun 2022
06 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
29
12
2021
accepted:
18
05
2022
entrez:
6
6
2022
pubmed:
7
6
2022
medline:
9
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Clinical trials during public health emergencies of novel medical products such as therapeutics and vaccines in resource-limited settings are daunting due to the limited capacity for regulatory assessment. Regulating clinical trials during the Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone required expedited evaluation to identify medical products that could be promptly introduced to combat the epidemic in the absence of approved treatment or prevention. This article explored the decisions taken by the Pharmacy Board of Sierra Leone through its Expert Committee on Medicine Safety and Clinical Trials regarding clinical trials oversight during the Ebola epidemic and the lessons learned. This independent expert committee assessed and provided scientific opinions to the Pharmacy Board of Sierra Leone to inform approval of all clinical trials within 10-15 working days. We also requested for assisted review from the African Vaccine Regulatory Forum and support from the US Food and Drug Administration through a unilateral recognition and reliance memorandum of understanding. In addition, the Agency-ensured structures and systems were in place for reporting and reviewing adverse events and serious adverse events, management of biological samples, submission and review of progress reports, and good clinical practice inspections. Unfortunately, the Ebola epidemic revealed many weaknesses in the country's clinical trials regulatory structure and processes. Government and partners should further offer more resources to build the clinical trial structures and systems so that the Agency will be better poised to handle future public health emergencies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35668457
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06416-4
pii: 10.1186/s13063-022-06416-4
pmc: PMC9167901
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
466Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 5;372(6):587-8
pubmed: 25539447
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Apr;37(4):352-355
pubmed: 30940936
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2019 Jun 11;12:13
pubmed: 31198563
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Jun;25(6):719-24
pubmed: 26887649
JAMA. 2005 Jun 15;293(23):2927-9
pubmed: 15911838
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 10;70(12):2476-2483
pubmed: 31328221
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 27;371(22):2092-100
pubmed: 25353969
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41174
pubmed: 22911755
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Aug 15;61(4):491-5
pubmed: 25995207
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 1;22(1):84
pubmed: 34210291
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 28;10(1):350
pubmed: 28754150
Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;15(5):436-443
pubmed: 29895178