Respiratory distress observation scales to predict weaning outcome.
Critical care
Dyspnea
Dyspnea observation scale
Intensive care unit
Respiratory Distress Observation Scale
Spontaneous breathing trial
Weaning from mechanical ventilation
Journal
Critical care (London, England)
ISSN: 1466-609X
Titre abrégé: Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 06 2022
06 06 2022
Historique:
received:
10
03
2022
accepted:
19
05
2022
entrez:
6
6
2022
pubmed:
7
6
2022
medline:
9
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Whether dyspnea is present before starting a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and whether it may affect the outcome of the SBT is unknown. Mechanical Ventilation-Respiratory Distress Observation Scale (MV-RDOS) has been proposed as a reliable surrogate of dyspnea in non-communicative intubated patients. In the present study, we sought (1) to describe the evolution of the MV-RDOS during a SBT and (2) to investigate whether MV-RDOS can predict the outcome of the SBT. Prospective, single-center study in a twenty-two bed ICU in a tertiary center. Patients intubated since more 48 h who had failed a first SBT were eligible if they meet classical readiness to wean criteria. The MV-RDOS was assessed before, at 2-min, 15-min and 30-min (end) of the SBT. The presence of clinically important dyspnea was inferred by a MV-RDOS value ≥ 2.6. Fifty-eight patients (age 63 [51-70], SAPS II 66 [51-76]; med [IQR]) were included. Thirty-three (57%) patients failed the SBT, whose 18 (55%) failed before 15-min. Twenty-five (43%) patients successfully passed the SBT. A MV-RDOS ≥ 2.6 was present in ten (17%) patients before to start the SBT. All these ten patients subsequently failed the SBT. A MV-RDOS ≥ 2.6 at 2-min predicted a SBT failure with a 51% sensibility and a 88% specificity (AUC 0.741 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.616-0.866, p = 0.002). Best cut-off value at 2-min was 4.3 and predicted SBT failure with a 27% sensibility and a 96% specificity. Despite patients met classical readiness to wean criteria, respiratory distress assessed with the MV-RDOS was frequent at the beginning of SBT. Measuring MV-RDOS before to initiate a SBT could avoid undue procedure and reduce patient's exposure to unnecessary mechanical ventilation weaning failure and distress.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Whether dyspnea is present before starting a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and whether it may affect the outcome of the SBT is unknown. Mechanical Ventilation-Respiratory Distress Observation Scale (MV-RDOS) has been proposed as a reliable surrogate of dyspnea in non-communicative intubated patients. In the present study, we sought (1) to describe the evolution of the MV-RDOS during a SBT and (2) to investigate whether MV-RDOS can predict the outcome of the SBT.
METHODS
Prospective, single-center study in a twenty-two bed ICU in a tertiary center. Patients intubated since more 48 h who had failed a first SBT were eligible if they meet classical readiness to wean criteria. The MV-RDOS was assessed before, at 2-min, 15-min and 30-min (end) of the SBT. The presence of clinically important dyspnea was inferred by a MV-RDOS value ≥ 2.6.
RESULTS
Fifty-eight patients (age 63 [51-70], SAPS II 66 [51-76]; med [IQR]) were included. Thirty-three (57%) patients failed the SBT, whose 18 (55%) failed before 15-min. Twenty-five (43%) patients successfully passed the SBT. A MV-RDOS ≥ 2.6 was present in ten (17%) patients before to start the SBT. All these ten patients subsequently failed the SBT. A MV-RDOS ≥ 2.6 at 2-min predicted a SBT failure with a 51% sensibility and a 88% specificity (AUC 0.741 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.616-0.866, p = 0.002). Best cut-off value at 2-min was 4.3 and predicted SBT failure with a 27% sensibility and a 96% specificity.
CONCLUSION
Despite patients met classical readiness to wean criteria, respiratory distress assessed with the MV-RDOS was frequent at the beginning of SBT. Measuring MV-RDOS before to initiate a SBT could avoid undue procedure and reduce patient's exposure to unnecessary mechanical ventilation weaning failure and distress.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35668459
doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04028-7
pii: 10.1186/s13054-022-04028-7
pmc: PMC9169318
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
162Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 15;195(6):772-783
pubmed: 27626706
J Palliat Med. 2007 Feb;10(1):86-98
pubmed: 17298257
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Dec;43(12):1793-1807
pubmed: 28936597
N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 19;335(25):1864-9
pubmed: 8948561
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun 1;199(11):1377-1384
pubmed: 30485121
J Palliat Med. 2010 Mar;13(3):285-90
pubmed: 20078243
J Palliat Med. 2015 Sep;18(9):781-5
pubmed: 26091245
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):277-82
pubmed: 11246306
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009 May 30;167(1):53-60
pubmed: 18706531
JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2175-2182
pubmed: 31184740
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec 15;192(12):1440-8
pubmed: 26669474
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):97-111
pubmed: 34181953
Respir Care. 2017 Feb;62(2):150-155
pubmed: 27965421
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Dec;30(6):572-83
pubmed: 18022811
Eur Respir J. 2018 Oct 10;52(4):
pubmed: 30209199
J Crit Care. 2013 Feb;28(1):62-8
pubmed: 23228727
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Jun;155(6):1940-8
pubmed: 9196100
Eur Respir J. 2007 May;29(5):1033-56
pubmed: 17470624
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Oct;101:10-16
pubmed: 28867413
Eur Respir J. 2018 Jul 27;52(1):
pubmed: 29773692
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun 1;199(11):1302-1304
pubmed: 30562045
Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Jun 28;11(1):99
pubmed: 34181105
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Apr;161(4 Pt 1):1115-23
pubmed: 10764299
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun 1;195(11):1477-1485
pubmed: 27768396
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873
pubmed: 30113379
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb 15;185(4):435-52
pubmed: 22336677
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Jan;149(1):14-8
pubmed: 8111572
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Aug 15;164(4):638-41
pubmed: 11520729
Anesthesiology. 2015 Oct;123(4):830-7
pubmed: 26259140
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Jul;103(1):140-7
pubmed: 17395760
Crit Care. 2016 Oct 27;20(1):346
pubmed: 27784322
Crit Care Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):613-20
pubmed: 25479115
Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep;39(9):2059-65
pubmed: 21572329
Eur Respir J. 2021 Nov 11;58(5):
pubmed: 33875492
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 15;205(8):917-926
pubmed: 35061577
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb 15;185(4):349-50
pubmed: 22336673
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Dec;36(12):2045-52
pubmed: 20689928