Consistency checks of results from a Monte Carlo code intercomparison for emitted electron spectra and energy deposition around a single gold nanoparticle irradiated by X-rays.
Journal
Radiation measurements
ISSN: 1350-4487
Titre abrégé: Radiat Meas
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9890953
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
entrez:
7
6
2022
pubmed:
8
6
2022
medline:
8
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Organized by the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), a Monte Carlo code intercomparison exercise was conducted where participants simulated the emitted electron spectra and energy deposition around a single gold nanoparticle (GNP) irradiated by X-rays. In the exercise, the participants scored energy imparted in concentric spherical shells around a spherical volume filled with gold or water as well as the spectral distribution of electrons leaving the GNP. Initially, only the ratio of energy deposition with and without GNP was to be reported. During the evaluation of the exercise, however, the data for energy deposition in the presence and absence of the GNP were also requested. A GNP size of 50 nm and 100 nm diameter was considered as well as two different X-ray spectra (50 kVp and 100kVp). This introduced a redundancy that can be used to cross-validate the internal consistency of the simulation results. In this work, evaluation of the reported results is presented in terms of integral quantities that can be benchmarked against values obtained from physical properties of the radiation spectra and materials involved. The impact of different interaction cross-section datasets and their implementation in the different Monte Carlo codes is also discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35669292
doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2021.106637
pmc: PMC9165644
mid: NIHMS1757388
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA187003
Pays : United States
Références
Mutat Res. 2011 Jun 3;711(1-2):28-40
pubmed: 21281649
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Sep 21;49(18):N309-15
pubmed: 15509078
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Sep;100(3):412-6
pubmed: 21924786
Med Phys. 2018 Jun 14;:
pubmed: 29901835
Phys Med. 2015 Dec;31(8):861-874
pubmed: 26653251
J Radiol Prot. 2021 Feb 26;41(1):
pubmed: 33406511
Nanoscale. 2012 Aug 21;4(16):4830-8
pubmed: 22767423
Radiat Res. 2019 Feb;191(2):125-138
pubmed: 30609382
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Mar 7;61(5):2014-24
pubmed: 26895030
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Aug 07;64(15):155016
pubmed: 31300616
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Sep;166(1-4):38-43
pubmed: 25883312
Phys Med. 2020 Dec;80:57-64
pubmed: 33115700
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jan 09;63(2):02TR01
pubmed: 29125831
Phys Med. 2020 Jan;69:147-163
pubmed: 31918367
Phys Med. 2020 Dec;80:383-388
pubmed: 33203583
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2010 Oct 08;15(6):176-80
pubmed: 24376946
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 21;10(1):12096
pubmed: 32694592
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017 Jan 15;109:84-101
pubmed: 26712711
Ann ICRP. 2018 Oct;47(3-4):20-34
pubmed: 29664324
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Sep;124(3):344-356
pubmed: 28784439
Phys Med. 2021 Apr;84:241-253
pubmed: 33766478
Ann ICRP. 2018 Oct;47(3-4):75-82
pubmed: 29664321
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Apr 21;57(8):2117-36
pubmed: 22451262