No universals in the cultural evolution of kinship terminology.
Cultural Evolution
Kinship
Kinship Terminology
Language Evolution
Phylogenetics
Journal
Evolutionary human sciences
ISSN: 2513-843X
Titre abrégé: Evol Hum Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101773423
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Aug 2020
03 Aug 2020
Historique:
entrez:
7
6
2022
pubmed:
3
8
2020
medline:
3
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Kinship terminologies are the semantic systems of language that express kinship relations between individuals: in English, 'aunt' denotes a parent's sister. Theoretical models of kinship terminology diversity reduce over 10 billion possible organisations to six key types, each of which are hypothesised to be aligned with particular cultural norms of descent, marriage or residence patterns (Murdock, 1949). Often, terminological type is used to infer social patterns in past societies based on these putative relationships between kinship terminologies and social structure, and these associations are staples of 'Anthropology 101'. However, these relationships have not been scrutinised using modern comparative methods. Here we show that kinship terminologies vertically track language phylogeny in Austronesian, Bantu, and Uto-Aztecan, three languages families of different time-depths and environments. We find no unidirectional or universal models of evolution in kinship terminology. Of 18 existing anthropological coevolutionary theories regarding kinship terminology and cultural practices across 176 societies, we find only patchy support, and no evidence for putative universal drivers of evolution in kinship terminologies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35669351
doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.41
pmc: PMC7612818
mid: EMS145094
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 639291
Pays : International
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 May 31;4(5):170208
pubmed: 28573032
Hum Nat. 2016 Jun;27(2):173-200
pubmed: 26846688
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 23;11(3):e0147920
pubmed: 27008364
Nature. 2010 Oct 14;467(7317):801-4
pubmed: 20944739
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 3;115(14):3628-3633
pubmed: 29555760
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 12;366(1563):402-11
pubmed: 21199844
Science. 2012 May 25;336(6084):1049-54
pubmed: 22628658
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 1;92(16):7585-9
pubmed: 11607569
Science. 2009 Jan 23;323(5913):479-83
pubmed: 19164742
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Oct;33(5):367-404; discussion 404-16
pubmed: 21205333
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 27;112(43):13296-301
pubmed: 26371302
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 5;114(49):12910-12915
pubmed: 29158378
Cognition. 2015 Aug;141:87-102
pubmed: 25966840
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0158391
pubmed: 27391016
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 05;9(6):e99117
pubmed: 24901532
Nature. 2016 Apr 14;532(7598):228-31
pubmed: 27042932
Hum Biol. 2011 Apr;83(2):297-321
pubmed: 21615291
Nature. 2011 May 5;473(7345):79-82
pubmed: 21490599