Level-Specific Volumetric BMD Threshold Values for the Prediction of Incident Vertebral Fractures Using Opportunistic QCT: A Case-Control Study.
bone mineral density (BMD)
multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)
osteoporosis
spinal fracture
threshold value
Journal
Frontiers in endocrinology
ISSN: 1664-2392
Titre abrégé: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
23
02
2022
accepted:
08
04
2022
entrez:
7
6
2022
pubmed:
8
6
2022
medline:
9
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To establish and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) threshold values at different spinal levels, derived from opportunistic quantitative computed tomography (QCT), for the prediction of incident vertebral fractures (VF). In this case-control study, 35 incident VF cases (23 women, 12 men; mean age: 67 years) and 70 sex- and age-matched controls were included, based on routine multi detector CT (MDCT) scans of the thoracolumbar spine. Trabecular vBMD was measured from routine baseline CT scans of the thoracolumbar spine using an automated pipeline including vertebral segmentation, asynchronous calibration for HU-to-vBMD conversion, and correction of intravenous contrast medium (https://anduin.bonescreen.de). Threshold values at T1-L5 were calculated for the optimal operating point according to the Youden index and for fixed sensitivities (60 - 85%) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. vBMD at each single level of the thoracolumbar spine was significantly associated with incident VFs (odds ratio per SD decrease [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI] at T1-T4: 3.28, 1.66-6.49; at T5-T8: 3.28, 1.72-6.26; at T9-T12: 3.37, 1.78-6.36; and at L1-L4: 3.98, 1.97-8.06), independent of adjustment for age, sex, and prevalent VF. AUC showed no significant difference between vertebral levels and was highest at the thoracolumbar junction (AUC = 0.75, 95%-CI = 0.63 - 0.85 for T11-L2). Optimal threshold values increased from lumbar (L1-L4: 52.0 mg/cm³) to upper thoracic spine (T1-T4: 69.3 mg/cm³). At T11-L2, T12-L3 and L1-L4, a threshold of 80.0 mg/cm³ showed sensitivities of 85 - 88%, and specificities of 41 - 49%. To achieve comparable sensitivity (85%) at more superior spinal levels, resulting thresholds were higher: 114.1 mg/cm³ (T1-T4), 92.0 mg/cm³ (T5-T8), 88.2 mg/cm³ (T9-T12). At all levels of the thoracolumbar spine, lower vBMD was associated with incident VFs in an elderly, predominantly oncologic patient population. Automated opportunistic osteoporosis screening of vBMD along the entire thoracolumbar spine allows for risk assessment of imminent VFs. We propose level-specific vBMD threshold at the thoracolumbar spine to identify individuals at high fracture risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35669688
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.882163
pmc: PMC9165054
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
882163Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Dieckmeyer, Löffler, El Husseini, Sekuboyina, Menze, Sollmann, Wostrack, Zimmer, Baum and Kirschke.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Clin Densitom. 2017 Jul - Sep;20(3):309-321
pubmed: 28712984
Eur Radiol. 2022 Mar;32(3):1465-1474
pubmed: 34687347
Eur Radiol. 2017 Dec;27(12):5261-5271
pubmed: 28639046
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 24;7(1):6284
pubmed: 28740145
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Calcif Tissue Int. 2012 Jun;90(6):481-7
pubmed: 22484555
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e676-e683
pubmed: 30385360
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Mar/Apr;41(2):217-223
pubmed: 27798444
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):499-508
pubmed: 32662758
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Aug;35(8):1628-33
pubmed: 24627455
J Clin Densitom. 2017 Apr - Jun;20(2):216-225
pubmed: 26781430
J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Feb;29(2):399-407
pubmed: 23873699
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Feb;30(2):323-331
pubmed: 30306225
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Apr;19(4):385-97
pubmed: 18292978
Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Jul 29;2(4):e190138
pubmed: 33937831
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Oct;25(10):2359-81
pubmed: 25182228
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Jan 11;11:552719
pubmed: 33505353
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(4):608-15
pubmed: 16437195
J Bone Miner Res. 1993 Sep;8(9):1137-48
pubmed: 8237484
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):509-510
pubmed: 32667255
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 8;11(1):5389
pubmed: 33686128
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Jun;30(6):1275-1285
pubmed: 30830261
J Bone Miner Res. 2016 Aug;31(8):1485-7
pubmed: 27335158
Bone. 2017 Oct;103:233-240
pubmed: 28716553
J Clin Densitom. 2015 Apr-Jun;18(2):145-9
pubmed: 25700662
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Jan;18(1):77-84
pubmed: 17048064
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 May;33(5):860-867
pubmed: 29314261
Eur Radiol. 2021 Aug;31(8):6069-6077
pubmed: 33507353
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Feb;32(2):261-269
pubmed: 32748310
Bone. 2016 Nov;92:100-106
pubmed: 27554426
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4980-4989
pubmed: 30790025
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jul 15;40(14):E842-8
pubmed: 25946722
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Feb;31(2):233-250
pubmed: 31728606
Radiologe. 1999 Mar;39(3):186-93
pubmed: 10218211
J Clin Densitom. 2008 Jan-Mar;11(1):123-62
pubmed: 18442757
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Feb;25(2):559-66
pubmed: 23925651
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):e140-5
pubmed: 20851544
J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Apr;27(4):808-16
pubmed: 22190331
Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:136
pubmed: 24113837
Am J Med. 1993 Jun;94(6):646-50
pubmed: 8506892
Eur Radiol. 2009 Jan;19(1):172-6
pubmed: 18641992
Neurol Clin. 2007 May;25(2):353-71
pubmed: 17445733
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Jun 2;16(1):82
pubmed: 34080059