Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Comprehensive Anemia Management, The First Pillar of Patient Blood Management, on the Turkish Healthcare System.
Turkey; Turkish healthcare system
budget impact
cost-effectiveness analysis
patient blood management
Journal
ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR
ISSN: 1178-6981
Titre abrégé: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101560564
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
16
02
2022
accepted:
07
05
2022
entrez:
7
6
2022
pubmed:
8
6
2022
medline:
8
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patient blood management (PBM) is a patient-centered, evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach aimed at optimizing hemoglobin concentration, ensuring the continuity of hemostasis and minimizing blood loss in patients undergoing surgery. The aims of this study were: (1) to explore the cost-effectiveness of comprehensive anemia management, the first pillar of PBM, in non-cardiac and cardiac surgery from the Turkish Social Security Institution's (SSI's) perspective; and (2) to explore the potential budget impact of PBM for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and hip and knee arthroplasty to the SSI. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact models were developed based on the avoided postoperative adverse events following implementation of the first pillar of PBM for non-cardiac and cardiac surgical patients. The probabilities of adverse events (sepsis with and without pneumonia, renal failure, myocardial infarction and stroke) were taken from a recent meta-analysis and the costs of treating these adverse events to the SSI were estimated through expert views and the use of SSI guidelines. The PBM arm dominated the control arm for both non-cardiac and cardiac surgeries in terms of cost-effectiveness in the simulated cohort of patients and was associated with improved outcomes and lower costs (1768 and 1244 avoided adverse events, and incremental cost reductions for non-cardiac and cardiac surgery of 7504 Turkish lira [TRY] and 6102 TRY, respectively). The budget impact analysis showed that PBM is a potential cost-saving option for the SSI, with savings of up to 196,937,705 TRY (€12,841,697) for hip and knee arthroplasty and 24,642,504 TRY (€1,606,861) for CABG surgery. PBM is a cost-effective option with a potential of cost-saving for cardiac and non-cardiac surgery in Turkey.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35669886
doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S360944
pii: 360944
pmc: PMC9166278
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
415-426Informations de copyright
© 2022 Tatar et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MT provides consultancy to Vifor Pharma. OB, BE, SG, CYG and NA report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Jun;108(6):943-52
pubmed: 22593128
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Feb 1;93(2):118-24
pubmed: 25883405
Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):203-11
pubmed: 27163948
Adv Ther. 2020 Aug;37(8):3515-3536
pubmed: 32562124
Heart Surg Forum. 2017 Oct 24;20(5):E195-E198
pubmed: 29087283
J Healthc Qual. 2019 Nov/Dec;41(6):376-383
pubmed: 31211739
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jul;42(1):114-20
pubmed: 22241009
Blood Transfus. 2014 Apr;12(2):195-203
pubmed: 24931841
Transfus Med Rev. 2011 Jul;25(3):232-246.e53
pubmed: 21498040
Blood Transfus. 2019 Jan;17(1):16-26
pubmed: 29517965
Transfusion. 2014 May;54(5):1358-65
pubmed: 24117533
Anesthesiology. 2011 Feb;114(2):283-92
pubmed: 21239971
Blood. 2009 Apr 9;113(15):3406-17
pubmed: 19188662
Transfusion. 2017 Jun;57(6):1347-1358
pubmed: 28150313
Transfusion. 2010 Apr;50(4):753-65
pubmed: 20003061
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 May;24(4):545-51
pubmed: 23633085
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Oct 1;110(7):1021-6
pubmed: 22771376
Singapore Med J. 2020 Jun;61(6):287-296
pubmed: 31044255
Transfusion. 2008 Feb;48(2):237-50
pubmed: 18005329
Blood Transfus. 2020 Jul;18(4):261-279
pubmed: 32697928
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2018 Apr 24;11:77-82
pubmed: 29731670
Transfusion. 2010 Oct;50(10):2080-99
pubmed: 20738828
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Mar;31(3):543-51
pubmed: 26694926
Anaesthesia. 2021 Mar;76(3):357-365
pubmed: 32851648
Lancet. 2011 Oct 15;378(9800):1396-407
pubmed: 21982521
Anesthesiology. 2012 Jun;116(6):1367-76
pubmed: 22487863
Transfusion. 2015 Dec;55(12):2807-15
pubmed: 26264557
Transfusion. 2015 May;55(5):1075-81
pubmed: 25565302
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2019 Oct 23;27(4):429-450
pubmed: 32082905
Blood Transfus. 2017 Jul;15(4):296-306
pubmed: 28151388
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Mar;27(1):59-68
pubmed: 23590916
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 28;173(2):132-9
pubmed: 23266500
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 May;208(5):931-7, 937.e1-2; discussion 938-9
pubmed: 19476865
Vox Sang. 2020 Feb;115(2):182-188
pubmed: 31823382
Blood Transfus. 2014 Jan;12(1):40-9
pubmed: 24120595
Blood Transfus. 2013 Apr;11(2):175-7
pubmed: 23522880
Blood Transfus. 2018 Sep;16(5):438-442
pubmed: 30036177
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3084-3088
pubmed: 32654943
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Oct;8(13):1099-1110
pubmed: 31580153
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019 Oct;47(5):402-406
pubmed: 31572992
Transfusion. 2014 Apr;54(4):1133-45
pubmed: 23927725
Transfus Med Rev. 2011 Apr;25(2):81-8
pubmed: 21345640
Ann Surg. 2019 May;269(5):794-804
pubmed: 30418206
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2020 Jul 28;28(3):560-569
pubmed: 32953226