Early venous congestion after diep flap breast reconstruction: case report of a successful management.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 06 2022
07 06 2022
Historique:
received:
24
02
2022
accepted:
03
03
2022
entrez:
7
6
2022
pubmed:
8
6
2022
medline:
10
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
More than 250 000 women estimated to be diagnosed with breast cancer in the USA every year. Mastectomy is primary treatment for more than a third of those with early-stage disease. Most of the patients undergoing mastectomy receive breast reconstruction. A number of. Surgical techniques have been described to reconstruct the breast. With autologous tissue breast reconstruction, the plastic surgeon uses patient's own tissues, taken from a different part of the body where there is an excess of fat and skin. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the autologous breast reconstruction technique of choice in our department due to long lasting results, low donor site morbidity and positive patient reported outcomes have been described. Case Report: We present the case of a 42-year-old woman who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by left breast simple mastectomy, axillary lymph-nodes dissection and later adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). After conclusion of RT a DIEP flap breast reconstruction was performed. Nine-hours after the operation, signs of acute venous congestion were noted. The venous congestion was treated by a combined surgical and medical approach based on pedicle discharge and ICU resuscitation protocol. After take back surgery, the patient was tightly monitored in the intensive care unit where intravenous heparin infusion and leech therapy were performed for 2 days. Flap congestion resolved completely, and the patient was discharged. Conclusions: Venous congestion is very difficult to treat due to its potential multifactorial nature. The most important step is to recognize this kind of emergency because irreversible microvascular damages will develop in 6-8 hours. Because of multiple causes of venous congestion a timely multidisciplinary approach is mandatory, to maximize flap salvage and success rates.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
More than 250 000 women estimated to be diagnosed with breast cancer in the USA every year. Mastectomy is primary treatment for more than a third of those with early-stage disease. Most of the patients undergoing mastectomy receive breast reconstruction. A number of. Surgical techniques have been described to reconstruct the breast. With autologous tissue breast reconstruction, the plastic surgeon uses patient's own tissues, taken from a different part of the body where there is an excess of fat and skin. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the autologous breast reconstruction technique of choice in our department due to long lasting results, low donor site morbidity and positive patient reported outcomes have been described. Case Report: We present the case of a 42-year-old woman who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by left breast simple mastectomy, axillary lymph-nodes dissection and later adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). After conclusion of RT a DIEP flap breast reconstruction was performed. Nine-hours after the operation, signs of acute venous congestion were noted. The venous congestion was treated by a combined surgical and medical approach based on pedicle discharge and ICU resuscitation protocol. After take back surgery, the patient was tightly monitored in the intensive care unit where intravenous heparin infusion and leech therapy were performed for 2 days. Flap congestion resolved completely, and the patient was discharged. Conclusions: Venous congestion is very difficult to treat due to its potential multifactorial nature. The most important step is to recognize this kind of emergency because irreversible microvascular damages will develop in 6-8 hours. Because of multiple causes of venous congestion a timely multidisciplinary approach is mandatory, to maximize flap salvage and success rates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35671114
doi: 10.23750/abm.v93iS1.12898
pmc: PMC10510956
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2022180Références
Microsurgery. 2013 Mar;33(3):239-46
pubmed: 23444315
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 May 21;8(5):e2879
pubmed: 33133915
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Jul;34(6):404-412
pubmed: 29452438
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):e3327
pubmed: 33564571
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):1401-1408
pubmed: 24281570
Microsurgery. 2002;22(8):361-6
pubmed: 12497573
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jan;74(1):47-51
pubmed: 23851375
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;70:106-109
pubmed: 32416478
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Sep 23;8(9):e3065
pubmed: 33133934
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;118(4):621-629
pubmed: 30212598
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Jan;62(1):71-6
pubmed: 18373968
Integr Med Res. 2017 Dec;6(4):337-343
pubmed: 29296560
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Nov 27;7(11):e2494
pubmed: 31942292
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jan;77(1):67-71
pubmed: 25003429
World J Surg. 2012 Jul;36(7):1486-97
pubmed: 22395342
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Jul 21;8(7):e3000
pubmed: 32802684
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 May 06;8(5):e2889
pubmed: 33133916
Laryngoscope. 2016 Jun;126(6):1271-2
pubmed: 26844537
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jan 25;5(1):e1217
pubmed: 28203513
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Feb;73(2):278-285
pubmed: 31711862
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021 Mar;37(3):216-226
pubmed: 32871602
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan;121(1):8-19
pubmed: 31309553
Acta Biomed. 2020 Jul 28;91(3):ahead of print
pubmed: 32921744
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 May;(314):122-33
pubmed: 7634624
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;27(13):5267-5276
pubmed: 32556869