Pingers are effective in reducing net entanglement of river dolphins.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 06 2022
07 06 2022
Historique:
received:
07
01
2022
accepted:
13
05
2022
entrez:
7
6
2022
pubmed:
8
6
2022
medline:
10
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ganges River dolphins echolocate, but this mechanism is inadequate for poor sonar-echoing objects such as the monofilament gillnets, causing considerable net entanglement related mortalities. Net entanglement related deaths are one of the major causes of cetacean population decline around the world. Experiments were carried out to understand the use of pingers-an acoustic deterrent, in aiding the deterrence of dolphins from fishing nets. Based on the dolphin clicks recorded, in an experimental setup spanning 36 days, a 90% deterrence was found; 22.87 ± 0.71 SE dolphin detection positive minutes per hour near non-pingered nets versus 2.20 ± 0.33 SE per hour near pingered net. Within 30 m radii of nets, visual encounters of non-calf reduced by 52% and calf by 9%, in the presence of pingers. No evidence of habituation to pingers, habitat avoidance in dolphins after pinger removal or a change in fish catch in nets because of pingers was found during the study. While the effectiveness of pingers on calves and fish catch needs further experimentation, the use of pingers to minimize net entanglement mortalities in the Ganges River dolphins seems to be the most promising solution currently available. These results have critical implications for the conservation of other species of river dolphins around the world.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35672330
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12670-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-12670-y
pmc: PMC9174236
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9382Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Ambio. 2014 Dec;43(8):1029-46
pubmed: 24924188
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 7;279(1748):4705-14
pubmed: 23055066
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 28;9(1):15426
pubmed: 31659202
Heliyon. 2020 Aug 15;6(8):e04690
pubmed: 32885071
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59284
pubmed: 23573197
Conserv Biol. 2016 Apr;30(2):318-28
pubmed: 26183819
Zoo Biol. 2013 Mar;32(2):210-5
pubmed: 23362088
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Jul 11;5(7):180254
pubmed: 30109081
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jan;113(1):638-42
pubmed: 12558299
Conserv Biol. 2013 Feb;27(1):121-33
pubmed: 23025354
Conserv Biol. 2007 Dec;21(6):1653-5
pubmed: 18173491
Braz J Biol. 2007 Feb;67(1):1-8
pubmed: 17505744
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jul;25(7):419-27
pubmed: 20483503
Conserv Biol. 2006 Feb;20(1):163-9
pubmed: 16909669
Biol Lett. 2007 Oct 22;3(5):537-40
pubmed: 17686754
Science. 1969 Dec 12;166(3911):1408-10
pubmed: 5350341
Mar Environ Res. 2007 Aug;64(2):160-80
pubmed: 17316783
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Aug 7;270 Suppl 1:S90-2
pubmed: 12952646