Significant increase in azithromycin "resistance" and susceptibility to ceftriaxone and cefixime in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in 26 European countries, 2019.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ pharmacology
Anti-Infective Agents
/ therapeutic use
Azithromycin
/ pharmacology
Cefixime
/ pharmacology
Ceftriaxone
/ pharmacology
Ciprofloxacin
/ pharmacology
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Female
Gonorrhea
/ drug therapy
Homosexuality, Male
Humans
Male
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Pharyngitis
/ drug therapy
Sexual and Gender Minorities
Antimicrobial resistance
Azithromycin
Ceftriaxone
Europe
European Economic Area (EEA)
European Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (Euro-GASP)
European Union (EU)
Gonorrhoea
Surveillance
Treatment
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jun 2022
07 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
07
03
2022
accepted:
27
05
2022
entrez:
7
6
2022
pubmed:
8
6
2022
medline:
10
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The European Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (Euro-GASP) performs annual sentinel surveillance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae susceptibility to therapeutically relevant antimicrobials across the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA). We present the Euro-GASP results from 2019 (26 countries), linked to patient epidemiological data, and compared with data from previous years. Agar dilution and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) gradient strip methodologies were used to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility (using EUCAST clinical breakpoints, where available) of 3239 N. gonorrhoeae isolates from 26 countries across the EU/EEA. Significance of differences compared with Euro-GASP results in previous years was analysed using Z-test and the Pearson's χ2 test was used to assess significance of odds ratios for associations between patient epidemiological data and antimicrobial resistance. European N. gonorrhoeae isolates collected between 2016 and 2019 displayed shifting MIC distributions for; ceftriaxone, with highly susceptible isolates increasing over time and occasional resistant isolates each year; cefixime, with highly-susceptible isolates becoming increasingly common; azithromycin, with a shift away from lower MICs towards higher MICs above the EUCAST epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF); and ciprofloxacin which is displaying a similar shift in MICs as observed for azithromycin. In 2019, two isolates displayed ceftriaxone resistance, but both isolates had MICs below the azithromycin ECOFF. Cefixime resistance (0.8%) was associated with patient sex, with resistance higher in females compared with male heterosexuals and men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM). The number of countries reporting isolates with azithromycin MICs above the ECOFF increased from 76.9% (20/26) in 2016 to 92.3% (24/26) in 2019. Isolates with azithromycin MICs above the ECOFF (9.0%) were associated with pharyngeal infection sites. Following multivariable analysis, ciprofloxacin resistance remained associated with isolates from MSM and heterosexual males compared with females, the absence of a concurrent chlamydial infection, pharyngeal infection sites and patients ≥ 25 years of age. Resistance to ceftriaxone and cefixime remained uncommon in EU/EEA countries in 2019 with a significant decrease in cefixime resistance observed between 2016 and 2019. The significant increase in azithromycin "resistance" (azithromycin MICs above the ECOFF) threatens the effectiveness of the dual therapy (ceftriaxone + azithromycin), i.e., for ceftriaxone-resistant cases, currently recommended in many countries internationally and requires close monitoring.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The European Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (Euro-GASP) performs annual sentinel surveillance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae susceptibility to therapeutically relevant antimicrobials across the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA). We present the Euro-GASP results from 2019 (26 countries), linked to patient epidemiological data, and compared with data from previous years.
METHODS
METHODS
Agar dilution and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) gradient strip methodologies were used to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility (using EUCAST clinical breakpoints, where available) of 3239 N. gonorrhoeae isolates from 26 countries across the EU/EEA. Significance of differences compared with Euro-GASP results in previous years was analysed using Z-test and the Pearson's χ2 test was used to assess significance of odds ratios for associations between patient epidemiological data and antimicrobial resistance.
RESULTS
RESULTS
European N. gonorrhoeae isolates collected between 2016 and 2019 displayed shifting MIC distributions for; ceftriaxone, with highly susceptible isolates increasing over time and occasional resistant isolates each year; cefixime, with highly-susceptible isolates becoming increasingly common; azithromycin, with a shift away from lower MICs towards higher MICs above the EUCAST epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF); and ciprofloxacin which is displaying a similar shift in MICs as observed for azithromycin. In 2019, two isolates displayed ceftriaxone resistance, but both isolates had MICs below the azithromycin ECOFF. Cefixime resistance (0.8%) was associated with patient sex, with resistance higher in females compared with male heterosexuals and men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM). The number of countries reporting isolates with azithromycin MICs above the ECOFF increased from 76.9% (20/26) in 2016 to 92.3% (24/26) in 2019. Isolates with azithromycin MICs above the ECOFF (9.0%) were associated with pharyngeal infection sites. Following multivariable analysis, ciprofloxacin resistance remained associated with isolates from MSM and heterosexual males compared with females, the absence of a concurrent chlamydial infection, pharyngeal infection sites and patients ≥ 25 years of age.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Resistance to ceftriaxone and cefixime remained uncommon in EU/EEA countries in 2019 with a significant decrease in cefixime resistance observed between 2016 and 2019. The significant increase in azithromycin "resistance" (azithromycin MICs above the ECOFF) threatens the effectiveness of the dual therapy (ceftriaxone + azithromycin), i.e., for ceftriaxone-resistant cases, currently recommended in many countries internationally and requires close monitoring.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35672671
doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07509-w
pii: 10.1186/s12879-022-07509-w
pmc: PMC9171984
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Anti-Infective Agents
0
Ciprofloxacin
5E8K9I0O4U
Ceftriaxone
75J73V1629
Azithromycin
83905-01-5
Cefixime
97I1C92E55
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
524Subventions
Organisme : European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
ID : Framework Contract No. ECDC/2017/004
Investigateurs
Claudia Eder
(C)
Sonja Pleininger
(S)
Steliana Huhlescu
(S)
Irith de Baetselier
(I)
Blaženka Hunjak
(B)
Tatjana Nemeth Blažić
(TN)
Panagiota Maikanti-Charalampous
(P)
Despo Pieridou
(D)
Hana Zákoucká
(H)
Helena Žemličková
(H)
Steen Hoffmann
(S)
Susan Cowan
(S)
Rita Peetso
(R)
Jelena Viktorova
(J)
Ndeindo Ndeikoundam
(N)
Beatrice Bercot
(B)
Anu Patari Sampo
(AP)
Vesa Kirjavainen
(V)
Susanne Buder
(S)
Klaus Jansen
(K)
Vivi Miriagou
(V)
Eszter Balla
(E)
Mária Dudás
(M)
Guðrún Sigmundsdóttir
(G)
Lena Ros Asmundsdottir
(LR)
Sinead Saab
(S)
Brendan Crowley
(B)
Anna Carannante
(A)
Paola Stefanelli
(P)
Gatis Pakarna
(G)
Violeta Mavcutko
(V)
Robert Cassar
(R)
Christopher Barbara
(C)
Francesca Vella
(F)
Alje Van Dam
(A)
Ineke Linde
(I)
Dominique Caugant
(D)
Hilde Kløvstad
(H)
Beata Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska
(B)
Maria-José Borrego
(MJ)
Peter Pavlik
(P)
Irena Klavs
(I)
Tanja Kustec
(T)
Julio Vazquez
(J)
Asuncion Diaz
(A)
Raquel Abad Torreblanca
(RA)
Inga Velicko
(I)
Magnus Unemo
(M)
Helen Fifer
(H)
Kate Templeton
(K)
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Int J STD AIDS. 2013 Feb;24(2):85-92
pubmed: 24400344
Sex Health. 2019 Sep;16(5):412-425
pubmed: 31437420
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):609
pubmed: 30509194
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 23;374(25):2504-6
pubmed: 27332921
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jul;18(7):758-768
pubmed: 29776807
Sex Transm Infect. 2015 Jun;91(4):234-7
pubmed: 25911525
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 18;21(1):273
pubmed: 33736608
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 10;19(1):1040
pubmed: 31822275
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jun 20;60(7):4339-41
pubmed: 27067334
Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;25(7):1427-1429
pubmed: 30900979
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 15;65(6):918-923
pubmed: 28549097
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 3;70(6):1169-1175
pubmed: 31049592
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 27;72(2):363-364
pubmed: 33501961
Int J STD AIDS. 2021 Feb;32(2):108-126
pubmed: 33323071
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Aug;69(8):2086-90
pubmed: 24777907
J Infect Chemother. 2007 Oct;13(5):302-4
pubmed: 17982718
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Mar 12;76(4):936-939
pubmed: 33406237
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014 Jul;27(3):587-613
pubmed: 24982323
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 May 1;74(5):1157-1166
pubmed: 30649333
J Mol Evol. 1992 Feb;34(2):115-25
pubmed: 1556747