Lasers for benign prostatic hyperplasia (hybrid, blue diode, TFL, Moses). Which one to choose?
Journal
Current opinion in urology
ISSN: 1473-6586
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9200621
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2022
01 07 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
9
6
2022
medline:
29
6
2022
entrez:
8
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To present the evidence of latest developments of lasers for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We focused on recent advancements in Ho:YAG laser such as Moses technology, the Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL), the blue diode laser, and hybrid laser. Laser enucleation of prostate techniques using either Ho:YAG laser with the Moses technology and Moses 2.0, or TFL seem efficient and safe compared with the standard enucleation using Ho:YAG laser. Only in vitro studies evaluated the blue diode laser and hybrid laser (combination of a continuous wave TFL and blue diode laser). Blue diode laser showed intermediate incision depth and minimal coagulation depth compared with Ho:YAG laser and Super Pulse TFL. Hybrid laser showed deep incision depth and small coagulation area compared with Ho:YAG laser and continuous wave TFL. Surgical treatment of BPH using Moses technology, Moses 2.0, and TFL shows encouraging results comparable to the standard enucleation using Ho:YAG laser. Only in vitro data are currently available for blue diode laser and hybrid laser. Future well-designed studies comparing these technologies and evaluating them on specific risk groups of patients as well as the long-term durability of outcomes are needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35674689
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000998
pii: 00042307-202207000-00017
doi:
Substances chimiques
Thulium
8RKC5ATI4P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
438-442Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Fried NM. Recent advances in infrared laser lithotripsy [Invited]. Biomed Opt Express 2018; 9:4552–4568.
Fried NM, Irby PB. Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol 2018; 15:563–573.
Herrmann TR, Liatsikos EN, Nagele U, et al. EAU Guidelines on lasers and technologies 2014; https://d56bochluxqnz.cloudfront.net/media/28-Laser_LR.pdf
Johnson DE, Cromeens DM, Price RE. Use of the holmium:YAG laser in urology. Lasers Surg Med 1992; 12:353–363.
Gravas S, Cornu JN, Gacci M, et al. EAU Guidelines on management of nonneurogenic male LUTS 2021. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/management-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts .
Lerner LB, McVary KT, Barry MJ, et al. Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA GUIDELINE PART II-Surgical Evaluation and Treatment. J Urol 2021; 206:818–826.
Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Cresswell MD, et al. Holmium laser resection of the prostate: preliminary results of a new method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1996; 47:48–51.
Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Cresswell MD, et al. The use of the holmium laser in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 1996; 10:459–461.
Hale GM, Querry MR. Optical constants of water in the 200-nm to 200-microm wavelength region. Appl Opt 1973; 12:555–563.
Jansen ED, van Leeuwen TG, Motamedi M, et al. Temperature dependence of the absorption coefficient of water for midinfrared laser radiation. Lasers Surg Med 1994; 14:258–268.
Lange BI, Brendel T, Huttmann G. Temperature dependence of light absorption in water at holmium and thulium laser wavelengths. Appl Opt 2002; 41:5797–5803.
Elhilali MM, Badaan S, Ibrahim A, et al. Use of the moses technology to improve holmium laser lithotripsy outcomes: a preclinical study. J Endourol 2017; 31:598–604.
Ventimiglia E, Traxer O. What is moses effect: a historical perspective. J Endourol 2019; 33:353–357.
Whiles BB, Martin AJ, Brevik A, et al. Utilization of MOSES modulated pulse mode results in improved efficiency in holmium:YAG laser ablation of the prostate. Urology 2021; 149:187–192.
Kavoussi NL, Nimmagadda N, Robles J, et al. MOSES(TM) technology for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2021; 206:104–108.
Large T, Nottingham C, Stoughton C, et al. Comparative study of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with MOSES enabled pulsed laser modulation. Urology 2020; 136:196–201.
Nevo A, Faraj KS, Cheney SM, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using Moses 2.0 vs non-Moses: a randomised controlled trial. BJU Int 2021; 127:553–559.
Nottingham CU, Large T, Agarwal DK, et al. Comparison of newly optimized moses technology vs standard holmium:YAG for endoscopic laser enucleation of the prostate. J Endourol 2021; 35:1393–1399.
Traxer O, Keller EX. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol 2020; 38:1883–1894.
Becker B, Enikeev D, Glybochko P, et al. Effect of optical fiber diameter and laser emission mode (cw vs pulse) on tissue damage profile using 1.94 microm Tm:fiber lasers in a porcine kidney model. World J Urol 2020; 38:1563–1568.
Taratkin M, Kovalenko A, Laukhtina E, et al. Ex vivo study of Ho:YAG and thulium fiber lasers for soft tissue surgery: which laser for which case? Lasers Med Sci 2022; 37:149–154.
Taratkin M, Netsch C, Enikeev D, et al. The impact of the laser fiber-tissue distance on histological parameters in a porcine kidney model. World J Urol 2021; 39:1607–1612.
Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Okhunov Z, et al. Retrospective analysis of short-term outcomes after monopolar versus laser endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a single center experience. J Endourol 2018; 32:417–423.
Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Rapoport L, et al. A randomized trial comparing the learning curve of 3 endoscopic enucleation techniques (HoLEP, ThuFLEP, and MEP) for BPH Using Mentoring Approach-Initial Results. Urology 2018; 121:51–57.
Enikeev D, Netsch C, Rapoport L, et al. Novel thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a prospective comparison with conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Int J Urol 2019; 26:1138–1143.
Enikeev D, Okhunov Z, Rapoport L, et al. Novel thulium fiber laser for enucleation of prostate: a retrospective comparison with open simple prostatectomy. J Endourol 2019; 33:16–21.
Morozov A, Taratkin M, Kozlov V, et al. Retrospective assessment of endoscopic enucleation of prostate complications: a single-center experience of more than 1400 patients. J Endourol 2020; 34:192–197.
Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Rapoport L, et al. Impact of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate with thulium fiber laser on the erectile function. BMC Urol 2018; 18:87.
Brunckhorst O, Ahmed K, Nehikhare O, et al. Evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using multiple outcome measures. Urology 2015; 86:824–829.
Vogel A, Venugopalan V. Mechanisms of pulsed laser ablation of biological tissues. Chem Rev 2003; 103:577–644.
Ishikawa I, Okamoto T, Morita S, et al. Blue-violet light emitting diode (LED) irradiation immediately controls socket bleeding following tooth extraction: clinical and electron microscopic observations. Photomed Laser Surg 2011; 29:333–338.
Braun A, Kettner M, Berthold M, et al. Efficiency of soft tissue incision with a novel 445-nm semiconductor laser. Lasers Med Sci 2018; 33:27–33.
Fornaini C, Merigo E, Rocca JP, et al. 450 nm blue laser and oral surgery: preliminary ex vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17:795–800.
Jiang DL, Yang Z, Liu GX, et al. A novel 450-nm blue laser system for surgical applications: efficacy of specific laser-tissue interactions in bladder soft tissue. Lasers Med Sci 2019; 34:807–813.
Xu X, Jiang D, Liu G, et al. In vitro evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a highpower 450-nm semiconductor blue laser in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. Lasers Med Sci 2022; 37:555–561.
Becker B, Enikeev D, Netsch C, et al. Comparative analysis of vaporization and coagulation properties of a hybrid laser (combination of a thulium and blue diode laser) vs thulium and Ho:YAG lasers: potential applications in endoscopic enucleation of the prostate. J Endourol 2020; 34:862–867.
Gauhar V, Gilling P, Pirola GM, et al. Does MOSES technology enhance the efficiency and outcomes of standard holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol Focus 2022; S2405-4569(22)00036-0.