Direct measurement of the


Journal

Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2022
Historique:
received: 01 03 2021
accepted: 13 04 2022
pubmed: 9 6 2022
medline: 2 7 2022
entrez: 8 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Helium-3 has nowadays become one of the most important candidates for studies in fundamental physics

Identifiants

pubmed: 35676477
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04761-7
pii: 10.1038/s41586-022-04761-7
pmc: PMC9242863
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

878-883

Subventions

Organisme : European Research Council
Pays : International

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

van Rooij, R. et al. Frequency metrology in quantum degenerate helium: direct measurement of the 2
pubmed: 21737737 doi: 10.1126/science.1205163
Rau, S. et al. Penning trap mass measurements of the deuteron and the HD
pubmed: 32879505 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2628-7
Heikkinen, P. J. et al. Fragility of surface states in topological superfluid
pubmed: 33692358 pmcid: 7946958 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21831-y
Shiner, D., Dixson, R. & Vedantham, V. Three-nucleon charge radius: a precise laser determination using He
pubmed: 10058234 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3553
Pachucki, K., Patkóš, V. & Yerokhin, V. A. Testing fundamental interactions on the helium atom. Phys. Rev. A 95, 062510 (2017).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.062510
Farooq, M. et al. Absolute magnetometry with
pubmed: 32567926 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.223001
Kupka, T., Stachów, M., Stobiński, L. & Kaminský, J.
pubmed: 23737362 doi: 10.1002/mrc.3972
Boucneau, T., Fernandez, B., Larson, P., Darrasse, L. & Maitre, X. 3D magnetic resonance spirometry. Sci. Rep. 10, 9649 (2020).
pubmed: 32541799 pmcid: 7295793 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66202-7
Nikiel, A. et al. Ultrasensitive
doi: 10.1140/epjd/e2014-50401-3
Flowers, J. L., Petley, B. W. & Richards, M. G. A measurement of the nuclear magnetic moment of the helium-3 atom in terms of that of the proton. Metrologia 30, 75 (1993).
doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/30/2/004
Neronov, Y. I. & Seregin, N. N. Precision determination of the difference in shielding by protons in water and hydrogen and an estimate of the absolute shielding by protons in water. Metrologia 51, 54 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/51/1/54
Tiesinga, E., Mohr, P. J., Newell, D. B. & Taylor, B. N. CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025010 (2021).
doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010
Yerokhin, V. A., Pachucki, K., Harman, Z. & Keitel, C. H. QED calculation of the nuclear magnetic shielding for hydrogenlike ions. Phys. Rev. A 85, 022512 (2012).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022512
Schüssler, H. A., Fortson, E. N. & Dehmelt, H. G. Hyperfine structure of the ground state of
doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.187.5
Zemach, A. C. Proton structure and the hyperfine shift in hydrogen. Phys. Rev. 104, 1771–1781 (1956).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.104.1771
Prior, M. H. & Wang, E. C. Hyperfine structure of the 2s state of
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.16.6
Karshenboim, S. G. & Ivanov, V. G. Hyperfine structure in hydrogen and helium ion. Phys. Lett. B 524, 259–264 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01394-6
Ullmann, J. et al. High precision hyperfine measurements in bismuth challenge bound-state strong-field QED. Nat. Commun. 8, 15484 (2017).
pubmed: 28508892 pmcid: 5440849 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15484
Skripnikov, L. V. et al. New nuclear magnetic moment of
pubmed: 29547322 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.093001
Rudzinski, A., Puchalski, M. & Pachucki, K. Relativistic, QED, and nuclear mass effects in the magnetic shielding of
pubmed: 19566137 doi: 10.1063/1.3159674
Abi, B. et al. Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46 ppm.Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021).
Iinuma, H. & J-PARC muon g-2/EDM collaboration. New approach to the muon g–2 and EDM experiment at J-PARC. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 295, 012032 (2011).
doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/295/1/012032
Neronov, Y. I. & Barzakh, A. E. Determination of the magnetic moment of the
Liu, W. et al. High precision measurements of the ground state hyperfine structure interval of muonium and of the muon magnetic moment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 711–714 (1999).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.711
Winkler, P. F., Kleppner, D., Myint, T. & Walther, F. G. Magnetic moment of the proton in Bohr magnetons. Phys. Rev. A 5, 83–114 (1972).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.5.83
Feynman, R., Leighton, R. & Sands, M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. III: The New Millennium Edition: Quantum Mechanics (Basic Books, 2011).
Moskovkin, D. L. & Shabaev, V. M. Zeeman effect of the hyperfine-structure levels in hydrogenlike ions. Phys. Rev. A 73, 052506 (2006).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.052506
Sturm, S. et al. High-precision measurement of the atomic mass of the electron. Nature 506, 467–470 (2014).
pubmed: 24553144 doi: 10.1038/nature13026
Heiße, F. et al. High-precision measurement of the proton’s atomic mass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 033001 (2017).
pubmed: 28777624 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.033001
Czarnecki, A., Melnikov, K. & Yelkhovsky, A. Anomalous magnetic moment of a bound electron. Phys. Rev. A 63, 012509 (2000).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.012509
Pachucki, K., Czarnecki, A., Jentschura, U. D. & Yerokhin, V. A. Complete two-loop correction to the bound-electron g factor. Phys. Rev. A 72, 022108 (2005).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.022108
Breit, G. The magnetic moment of the electron. Nature 122, 649–649 (1928).
doi: 10.1038/122649a0
Beier, T. The g
doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00071-5
Shabaev, V. M. Hyperfine structure of hydrogen-like ions. J. Phys. B 27, 5825–5832 (1994).
doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/27/24/006
Häffner, H. et al. High-accuracy measurement of the magnetic moment anomaly of the electron bound in hydrogenlike carbon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5308–5311 (2000).
pubmed: 11135983 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5308
Sellner, S. et al. Improved limit on the directly measured antiproton lifetime. New J. Phys. 19, 083023 (2017).
doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/aa7e73
Gabrielse, G. Why is sideband mass spectrometry possible with ions in a Penning trap? Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 172501 (2009).
pubmed: 19518777 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.172501
Wineland, D. J. & Dehmelt, H. G. Principles of the stored ion calorimeter. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 919–930 (1975).
doi: 10.1063/1.321602
Cornell, E. A., Weisskoff, R. M., Boyce, K. R. & Pritchard, D. E. Mode coupling in a Penning trap: π pulses and a classical avoided crossing. Phys. Rev. A 41, 312–315 (1990).
pubmed: 9902871 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.312
Dehmelt, H. G. Continuous Stern–Gerlach effect: principle and idealized apparatus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 2291–2294 (1986).
pubmed: 16593681 pmcid: 323282 doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2291
Mooser, A. et al. Resolution of single spin flips of a single proton. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 140405 (2013).
pubmed: 25166966 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.140405
Schneider, G. et al. Double-trap measurement of the proton magnetic moment at 0.3 parts per billion precision. Science 358, 1081–1084 (2017).
pubmed: 29170238 doi: 10.1126/science.aan0207
Smorra, C. et al. A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature 550, 371–374 (2017).
pubmed: 29052625 doi: 10.1038/nature24048
Bohman, M. et al. Sympathetic cooling of protons and antiprotons with a common endcap Penning trap. J. Mod. Opt. 65, 568–576 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/09500340.2017.1404656
Brown, L. S. Geonium lineshape. Ann. Phys. 159, 62–98 (1985).
doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(85)90192-7
Verdu Galiana, J. L. Ultrapräzise Messung des Elektronischen g-Faktors in Wasserstoffähnlichem Sauerstoff. PhD thesis, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (2004).
Häffner, H. Präzisionsmessung des magnetischen Moments des Elektrons in Wasserstoffähnlichem Kohlenstoff. PhD thesis, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (2000).
Ketter, J., Eronen, T., Höcker, M., Streubel, S. & Blaum, K. First-order perturbative calculation of the frequency-shifts caused by static cylindrically-symmetric electric and magnetic imperfections of a Penning trap. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 358, 1–16 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2013.10.005
Friar, J. L. & Payne, G. L. Nuclear corrections to hyperfine structure in light hydrogenic atoms. Phys. Rev. C 72, 014002 (2005).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.014002
Sick, I. Zemach moments of
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.064002
Zatorski, J. et al. Extraction of the electron mass from g-factor measurements on light hydrogenlike ions. Phys. Rev. A 96, 012502 (2017).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.012502
Schneider, A. et al. A novel Penning-trap design for the high-precision measurement of the
doi: 10.1002/andp.201800485

Auteurs

A Schneider (A)

Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany. antonia.schneider@mpi-hd.mpg.de.

B Sikora (B)

Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.

S Dickopf (S)

Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.

M Müller (M)

Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.

N S Oreshkina (NS)

Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.

A Rischka (A)

Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.

I A Valuev (IA)

Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.

S Ulmer (S)

RIKEN, Ulmer Fundamental Symmetries Laboratory, Wako, Japan.

J Walz (J)

Institute for Physics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Helmholtz Institute Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Z Harman (Z)

Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.

C H Keitel (CH)

Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.

A Mooser (A)

Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.

K Blaum (K)

Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH