Biomarker Testing for Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC in the United States of America, 2015 to 2021.

Biomarker testing Next-generation sequencing Non–small cell Real-world evidence

Journal

JTO clinical and research reports
ISSN: 2666-3643
Titre abrégé: JTO Clin Res Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101769967

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 02 03 2022
revised: 18 04 2022
accepted: 01 05 2022
entrez: 9 6 2022
pubmed: 10 6 2022
medline: 10 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

NSCLC is a solid tumor with a growing number of actionable biomarkers that may inform treatment. Current guidelines recommend a broad, panel-based approach be taken to identify actionable markers. This retrospective study used a deidentified electronic health records database in the United States to evaluate utilization of various testing modalities. Data from all adult patients diagnosed with having advanced/metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC between January 2015 and March 2021 were eligible if there was evidence of systemic therapy within 90 days of diagnosis. Records from a total of 17,513 patients (91.6% from community-based practices) were eligible with 83,064 genomic biomarker tests recorded from 2015 to 2021. The proportion of patients who received biomarker testing by next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based methods ranged from 28.3% in 2015 to 68.1% in 2020. The proportion of biomarker testing methods with inconclusive or unsuccessful results ranged from 3.4% for NGS to 9.7% for fluorescence in situ hybridization. The median time to receive results ranged from 4.0 days for polymerase chain reaction-based tests to 10.0 days for immunohistochemistry- and NGS-based tests. Median time to receive results was 8 days for academic and 9 days for community practices. These real-world data suggest increased adoption of NGS-based testing, yet nearly one-third of all patients with advanced/metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC still did not receive broad-based genomic testing by 2020.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35677681
doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100336
pii: S2666-3643(22)00060-1
pmc: PMC9168140
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100336

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors.

Références

Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Apr 15;27(8):2130-2135
pubmed: 33239432
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:531-542
pubmed: 31099633
J Mol Diagn. 2021 Apr;23(4):484-494
pubmed: 33493663
Drugs. 2021 Sep;81(13):1573-1579
pubmed: 34357500
JAMA. 2019 Apr 9;321(14):1391-1399
pubmed: 30964529
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Mar 02;19(3):254-266
pubmed: 33668021
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar;147(3):671-690
pubmed: 33263865
Lung Cancer. 2018 Feb;116:90-95
pubmed: 29413057
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33
pubmed: 33433946
Virchows Arch. 2021 May;478(5):995-1006
pubmed: 33225398
J Oncol. 2021 Jan 12;2021:7836264
pubmed: 33519934
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Aug;94(8):1623-1640
pubmed: 31378236

Auteurs

Lisa M Hess (LM)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Peter M Krein (PM)

LOXO Oncology, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Diane Haldane (D)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Yimei Han (Y)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Anthony N Sireci (AN)

LOXO Oncology, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Classifications MeSH