Comparison of Short-Term Effects of Treatment of Accommodative Infacility with Low Plus Addition in Single Vision Rx or Vision Therapy: A Pilot Study.
+2/-2 flipper
CISS
Hart Chart
accommodative dysfunction
infacility
Journal
Clinical optometry
ISSN: 1179-2752
Titre abrégé: Clin Optom (Auckl)
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101730504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
23
12
2021
accepted:
20
04
2022
entrez:
9
6
2022
pubmed:
10
6
2022
medline:
10
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare the short-term treatment effect of low plus reading addition (ADD) and home-based vision therapy (VT) in a small group of symptomatic children with accommodative infacility (AIF) being the most significant dysfunction. Nineteen children, 8 to 12 years of age, with a first-time diagnosis of AIF were consecutively and alternately allocated to treatment with ADD (+0.50 D addition in single vision Rx) or VT (accommodation exercises using Hart Charts) for a period of 6 weeks. Accommodation facility (AF) was measured monocularly (MAF-R, MAF-L) and binocularly (BAF) with +2 D/-2 D flipper and registered in cycles per minute (cpm). Symptoms were graded using the convergence insufficiency symptom survey (CISS). Measurements were compared before and after treatment and between groups using nonparametric statistics (p < 0.05). Ten children were allocated to ADD (median age 9.0 F:5) and 9 to VT (median age 11.0 F:7). Baseline median measurements of MAF-R, MAF-L, BAF and CISS were 3.0, 3.0, 2.2 cpm, and 27.5 points, respectively, for ADD, and 2.0, 2.0, 2.0 cpm, and 27.0 points, respectively, for VT. There were no significant differences between groups at baseline. After 6 weeks of treatment, the median change of MAF-R, MAF-L, BAF and CISS was +5.0, +4.5, +4.7 cpm, and -7.5 points, respectively, for ADD and +8.0, +8.0, +10.0 cpm, and -20.0 points, respectively for VT. All changes within groups were significant. Comparison of groups showed a significantly greater effect of treatment with VT compared to ADD for BAF (p = 0.008) and CISS (p = 0.017). In children with newly diagnosed AIF, treatment with accommodation exercises for 6 weeks gives greater short-term relief of symptoms and improvement of binocular accommodative facility compared to treatment with spectacle single vision correction with a weak plus addition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35677714
doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S355508
pii: 355508
pmc: PMC9169973
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
83-92Informations de copyright
© 2022 Balke et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Göran Skjöld is via HB Sekon, the distributor of HTS software in the Nordic countries. The authors report no other conflicts or competing interest in this work.
Références
Clin Exp Optom. 2001 Nov;84(6):346-353
pubmed: 12366360
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Oct;47(10):4393-400
pubmed: 17003431
Vis Dev Rehabil. 2015 Oct;1(3):214-228
pubmed: 26942226
Strabismus. 2010 Jun;18(2):67-71
pubmed: 20521882
Doc Ophthalmol. 1999;99(1):93-101
pubmed: 10947012
J Am Optom Assoc. 1985 Jul;56(7):560-2
pubmed: 4020010
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1979 May;56(5):285-94
pubmed: 495685
Optom Vis Sci. 1995 Apr;72(4):224-32
pubmed: 7609947
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;26(6):367-377
pubmed: 31181970
Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;80(12):832-8
pubmed: 14688547
Am J Health Promot. 2015 May-Jun;29(5):324-31
pubmed: 24717070
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987 Jun;64(6):430-6
pubmed: 3631199
Strabismus. 2008 Apr-Jun;16(2):65-9
pubmed: 18484507
J Am Optom Assoc. 1984 Jan;55(1):31-7
pubmed: 6699343
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987 Jun;64(6):415-20
pubmed: 3307438
J Am Optom Assoc. 1985 Apr;56(4):286-90
pubmed: 3989210
J Am Optom Assoc. 1978 Sep;49(9):1047-54
pubmed: 701721
Optometry. 2002 Dec;73(12):735-62
pubmed: 12498561
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Nov;88(11):1343-52
pubmed: 21873922
J Am Optom Assoc. 1982 Oct;53(10):821-5
pubmed: 7142635
Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1973 Oct;50(10):813-6
pubmed: 4520500
Doc Ophthalmol. 1983 May 1;55(3):177-98
pubmed: 6884172
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1915;14(Pt 1):386-402
pubmed: 16692358
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984 Mar;61(3):177-83
pubmed: 6720863
Clin Exp Optom. 2007 Jan;90(1):36-43
pubmed: 17177664