Comparison of saline versus air for identifying endotracheal intubation with ultrasound.


Journal

The American journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1532-8171
Titre abrégé: Am J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309942

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2022
Historique:
received: 11 05 2022
revised: 25 05 2022
accepted: 26 05 2022
pubmed: 10 6 2022
medline: 20 7 2022
entrez: 9 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

After intubation has been performed, it is important to rapidly confirm the correct location of the endotracheal tube (ETT). Multiple techniques have been described, each with different limitations. Ultrasound has been increasingly recognized as an alternate modality for identifying the ETT location. However, it can be challenging to visualize the air-filled ETT cuff. Saline insufflation of the ETT cuff has been suggested to improve visualization of the ETT but data are limited. Our study sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of air versus saline ETT cuff inflation on the diagnostic accuracy of intubation. This was a randomized trial comparing air versus saline cuff inflation using a cadaver model. Adult cadavers were intubated in a random sequence with respect to both the location of intubation (i.e., tracheal vs esophageal) and air versus saline. Blinded sonographers assessed the location of the ETT using the static technique. Outcomes included accuracy of sonographer identification, time to identification, and operator confidence. 480 total assessments were performed. When using air, ultrasound was 95.8% sensitive (95% CI 90.5% to 98.6%) and 100% specific (95% CI 97.0% to 100%) with a mean time to confirmation of 8.5 s (95% CI 7.6 s to 9.4 s) and a mean operator confidence of 4.32/5.0 (95% CI 4.21 to 4.42). When using saline, ultrasound was 100% sensitive (95% CI 97.0% to 100%) and 100% specific (95% CI 97.0% to 100%) with a mean time to confirmation of 6.3 s (95% CI 5.9 s to 6.8 s) and a mean operator confidence of 4.52/5.0 (95% CI 4.44 to 4.60). There was no statistically significant difference between air versus saline for intubation confirmation. However, saline was associated with fewer false negatives. Additionally, time to confirmation was faster and operator confidence was higher with the saline group. Further studies should determine if the outcomes would change with more novice sonographers or in specific patient populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35679656
pii: S0735-6757(22)00361-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.05.053
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

131-134

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest We have no conflicts of interest nor financial support to disclose.

Auteurs

Michael Gottlieb (M)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Electronic address: MichaelGottliebMD@Gmail.com.

Daven Patel (D)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Christine Jung (C)

Department of Emergency Medicine, John H. Stroger, Jr, Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

David Murray (D)

Department of Emergency Medicine, John H. Stroger, Jr, Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Molly Hartrich (M)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Science System, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Evelyn Schraft (E)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Jasmine Ginn (J)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Gary D Peksa (GD)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Tina Sundaram (T)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH