Comparison of saline versus air for identifying endotracheal intubation with ultrasound.
Air
Endotracheal
Intubation
Saline
Ultrasound
Journal
The American journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1532-8171
Titre abrégé: Am J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
11
05
2022
revised:
25
05
2022
accepted:
26
05
2022
pubmed:
10
6
2022
medline:
20
7
2022
entrez:
9
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
After intubation has been performed, it is important to rapidly confirm the correct location of the endotracheal tube (ETT). Multiple techniques have been described, each with different limitations. Ultrasound has been increasingly recognized as an alternate modality for identifying the ETT location. However, it can be challenging to visualize the air-filled ETT cuff. Saline insufflation of the ETT cuff has been suggested to improve visualization of the ETT but data are limited. Our study sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of air versus saline ETT cuff inflation on the diagnostic accuracy of intubation. This was a randomized trial comparing air versus saline cuff inflation using a cadaver model. Adult cadavers were intubated in a random sequence with respect to both the location of intubation (i.e., tracheal vs esophageal) and air versus saline. Blinded sonographers assessed the location of the ETT using the static technique. Outcomes included accuracy of sonographer identification, time to identification, and operator confidence. 480 total assessments were performed. When using air, ultrasound was 95.8% sensitive (95% CI 90.5% to 98.6%) and 100% specific (95% CI 97.0% to 100%) with a mean time to confirmation of 8.5 s (95% CI 7.6 s to 9.4 s) and a mean operator confidence of 4.32/5.0 (95% CI 4.21 to 4.42). When using saline, ultrasound was 100% sensitive (95% CI 97.0% to 100%) and 100% specific (95% CI 97.0% to 100%) with a mean time to confirmation of 6.3 s (95% CI 5.9 s to 6.8 s) and a mean operator confidence of 4.52/5.0 (95% CI 4.44 to 4.60). There was no statistically significant difference between air versus saline for intubation confirmation. However, saline was associated with fewer false negatives. Additionally, time to confirmation was faster and operator confidence was higher with the saline group. Further studies should determine if the outcomes would change with more novice sonographers or in specific patient populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35679656
pii: S0735-6757(22)00361-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.05.053
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
131-134Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest We have no conflicts of interest nor financial support to disclose.