Evaluation of Ultrasound Measurement of Subcutaneous Fat Thickness in Dairy Jennies during the Periparturient Period.
jennies
periparturient period
real time ultrasonography
subcutaneous fat
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 May 2022
26 May 2022
Historique:
received:
14
04
2022
revised:
17
05
2022
accepted:
24
05
2022
entrez:
10
6
2022
pubmed:
11
6
2022
medline:
11
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The body condition score (BCS) represents a practical but subjective method for assessing body fat reserves. Real time ultrasonography (RTU) has been proposed as an accurate method to objectively measure subcutaneous fat (SF) thickness and predict body fat reserves in cows, horses and donkeys. The aim of the present study was to describe RTU measures of SF thickness during periparturient period in jennies. The present prospective cohort study evaluated six dairy jennies. SF RTU were performed at 15 and 7 days before the presumptive delivery, and 2, 15 and 30 days after delivery. A portable ultrasound machine and multifrequency linear transducer (5-7.5 MHz) was used. RTU images were obtained in six sites (S1-S6). Results at each time point were reported as mean ± standard deviation and compared through time. A total of 180 images were evaluated. RTU technique was easy to perform and well tolerated. No statistically significant differences were found of each site during time, except for S2 and S6a: S2 at T2 and S6a at T1 were significatively different to values obtained at T5. The RTU mean values were above those reported by others, suggesting major physio-logical challenges related to energy balance and fat mobilization in pregnant jennies bred for milking production. BCS and sites through observational time have shown a good and reliable association. Our study could give preliminary indications on fat reserves in different body locations evaluated thanks to RTU and it show no significative variation of SF thickness, in pregnant and lactating jennies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35681823
pii: ani12111359
doi: 10.3390/ani12111359
pmc: PMC9179614
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Theriogenology. 2020 Jan 15;142:310-314
pubmed: 31711687
Heliyon. 2020 Aug 03;6(8):e04598
pubmed: 32775752
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 03;11(10):
pubmed: 34679906
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jun;95(6):2910-5
pubmed: 22612928
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 02;11(6):
pubmed: 34199350
J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(6):3420-30
pubmed: 24704224
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 17;11(11):
pubmed: 34828023
Res Vet Sci. 2020 Aug;131:254-258
pubmed: 32438068
Vet J. 2013 Aug;197(2):329-34
pubmed: 23395347
J Dairy Sci. 1995 Oct;78(10):2308-13
pubmed: 8598414
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jan 26;12(3):
pubmed: 35158628
Acta Vet Scand. 2016 Oct 20;58(Suppl 1):62
pubmed: 27766985
Theriogenology. 2015 Sep 1;84(4):650-5
pubmed: 26007611
Vet J. 2012 Nov;194(2):173-8
pubmed: 22578691
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Dec;89(6 Suppl 1):97-101
pubmed: 12487214
Vet Rec. 2016 Sep 24;179(12):298-300
pubmed: 27660353
J Equine Vet Sci. 2021 Apr;99:103401
pubmed: 33781411
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 29;11(11):
pubmed: 34827827
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 24;10(12):
pubmed: 33255408
PeerJ. 2017 Mar 28;5:e3001
pubmed: 28367363
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Jan;89(1):1-14
pubmed: 16357263