Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Puncture and Embolization of Visceral Pseudoaneurysms: Feasibility and Outcomes.

embolization percutaneous approach trans-arterial approach visceral pseudoaneurysm

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 May 2022
Historique:
received: 15 03 2022
revised: 18 05 2022
accepted: 19 05 2022
entrez: 10 6 2022
pubmed: 11 6 2022
medline: 11 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Visceral artery pseudoaneurysms (VAPAs) are the most frequently diagnosed pseudoaneurysms (PSAs). PSAs can be asymptomatic or symptomatic. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous embolization of VAPAs performed on patients with an unfeasible trans-arterial approach. Fifteen patients with fifteen visceral PSAs, with a median dimension of 21 mm (IQR 20-24 mm), were retrospectively analyzed. No patients were suitable for trans-arterial catheterization and therefore a percutaneous approach was chosen. During percutaneous treatments, two embolic agents were used, either N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) (Glubran II, GEM Milan, Italy) mixed with Lipiodol (Lipiodol, Guerbet, France) or thrombin. The outcomes of this study were technical success, primary clinical success, and secondary clinical success. In our population the 15 PSA were located as follows: 2 in the left gastric artery, 1 in the right gastric artery, 3 in the right hepatic artery, 2 in a jejunal artery, 1 in left colic artery branch, 1 in a right colic artery branch, 1 in the gastroepiploic artery, 1 in the dorsal pancreatic artery, 1 in an ileocolic artery branch, 1 in an iliac artery branch, and 1 in a sigmoid artery branch. 80% of PSAs (12/15) were treated with a NBCA:lipiodol mixture and 20% of PSAs (3/15) were treated with thrombin. Technical, primary, and secondary clinical successes were obtained in 100% of the cases. No harmful or life-threatening complications were observed. Minor complications were registered in 26.6% (4/15) of the patients. Percutaneous embolization of visceral PSA is a safe and effective treatment and should be considered as an option when the endovascular approach is unsuccessful or unfeasible.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35683341
pii: jcm11112952
doi: 10.3390/jcm11112952
pmc: PMC9181803
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1994 Jul-Aug;17(4):179-84
pubmed: 7954570
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Feb;45(2):276-83; discussion 283
pubmed: 17264002
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Apr;96(4):1067-71
pubmed: 11316148
Emerg Radiol. 2018 Dec;25(6):719-722
pubmed: 30155849
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Dec;20(6):248
pubmed: 33178346
Eur Radiol. 2003 Dec;13 Suppl 4:L79-82
pubmed: 15018170
Radiology. 1995 May;195(2):463-6
pubmed: 7724767
Eur J Radiol. 2006 Jul;59(1):104-11
pubmed: 16597492
Pol J Radiol. 2018 Dec 05;83:e510-e513
pubmed: 30655931
Radiographics. 2013 May;33(3):E71-96
pubmed: 23674782
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;30(4):789-92
pubmed: 17508246
Radiology. 2006 Mar;238(3):1070-1
pubmed: 16505401
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jul;22(7):1297-1298
pubmed: 29255955
Radiology. 2003 Feb;226(2):452-8
pubmed: 12563139
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 Jan;11(1):66-72
pubmed: 10693716
Surg Clin North Am. 1989 Dec;69(6):1123-335
pubmed: 2595519
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992 Feb;25(2):91-7
pubmed: 1544161
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Mar;41(3):385-397
pubmed: 29164308
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 29;13(1):e0191998
pubmed: 29377944
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Oct;28(10):1432-1437.e3
pubmed: 28757285
Pol J Radiol. 2016 Sep 26;81:462-464
pubmed: 27757174
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Sep;187(3):W290-8
pubmed: 16928907
Surg Case Rep. 2020 Oct 19;6(1):270
pubmed: 33074371
Radiographics. 2005 Oct;25 Suppl 1:S173-89
pubmed: 16227490
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Apr;35(4):805-7
pubmed: 11932684
Hamostaseologie. 2018 Aug;38(3):166-172
pubmed: 30261523
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2016 Dec 20;6:48
pubmed: 28123838
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 May-Jun;30(3):526-8
pubmed: 17131209
Surg Clin North Am. 1997 Apr;77(2):425-42
pubmed: 9146723
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Jun;14(6):697-710
pubmed: 12817037
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Jun;36(3):669-75
pubmed: 23161362

Auteurs

Serena Carriero (S)

Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Carolina Lanza (C)

Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Pierpaolo Biondetti (P)

Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Department of Health Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Matteo Renzulli (M)

Radiology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicine, Sant'Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

Cristian Bonelli (C)

Healthcare Professional Department, Foundation IRCSS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Filippo Piacentino (F)

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, ASST Settelaghi, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Department of Radiology, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy.

Federico Fontana (F)

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, ASST Settelaghi, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Department of Radiology, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy.

Massimo Venturini (M)

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, ASST Settelaghi, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Department of Radiology, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy.

Gianpaolo Carrafiello (G)

Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Department of Health Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Anna Maria Ierardi (AM)

Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH