Corneal Behavior during Tonometer Measurement during the Water Drinking Test in Eyes with XEN GelStent in Comparison to Non-Implanted Eyes.

XEN GelStent corneal hysteresis corneal resistance factor intraocular pressure open-angle glaucoma

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 May 2022
Historique:
received: 27 03 2022
revised: 15 05 2022
accepted: 18 05 2022
entrez: 10 6 2022
pubmed: 11 6 2022
medline: 11 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Biomechanics of the cornea have significant influences on the non-contact measurement of the intraocular pressure. The corneal behaviour during tonometry is a fundamental factor in estimating its value. The aim of the study was to analyse the behaviour of the cornea during tonometric measurement with the forced change in intraocular pressure during the water drinking test. Ocular Response Analyser (Reichert) was used to the measurement. Besides four basic parameters connected with intraocular pressure (IOPg, IOPcc) and biomechanics (corneal hysteresis CH and corneal resistance factor (CRF), other parameters representing the behaviour of the cornea during a puff of air were analysed. There were 47 eyes included in the study, including 27 eyes with a XEN GelStent implanted and 20 without it. The eyes of people with monocular implementation were the reference group. The values of analysed parameters were compared before and after 10, 25, 40, and 55 min after drinking the water. The intraocular pressure increased by 2.4 mmHg (p < 0.05) for eyes with a XEN stent and 2.2 mmHg for eyes without a stent (p < 0.05) in the tenth minute after drinking of water. This change caused a decreasing of corneal hysteresis (p < 0.05) without significant changes in the corneal resistance factor (p > 0.05). Corneal hysteresis changed similarly in the reference group and the group with a XEN GelStent. The analysis of additional parameters showed a difference in the behaviour of the cornea in eyes with a XEN GelStent in comparison to the corneas of eyes without a stent. This was particularly visible in the analysis of the cornea’s behaviour during the second applanation, when the cornea returns to its baseline state after deformation caused by air puff tonometry.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35683350
pii: jcm11112962
doi: 10.3390/jcm11112962
pmc: PMC9181234
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Wroclaw Medical University Grant for Young Researchers
ID : STM.C240.17.037

Références

J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 29;11(1):
pubmed: 35011918
Postgrad Med J. 2006 Sep;82(971):581-7
pubmed: 16954455
Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;85(6):463-70
pubmed: 18521025
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 06;33(4):394-399
pubmed: 35128184
Optom Vis Sci. 1997 Aug;74(8):668-75
pubmed: 9323739
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007 Jul;27(4):412-5
pubmed: 17584294
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;164:14-21
pubmed: 26743618
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;66(2):190-194
pubmed: 29380756
Optom Vis Sci. 2005 May;82(5):428-31
pubmed: 15894919
J Refract Surg. 2013 Oct;29(10):709-14
pubmed: 24094311
J Glaucoma. 2008 Jun-Jul;17(4):259-62
pubmed: 18552609
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;153(3):419-427.e1
pubmed: 22018707
Acta Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb;88(1):116-9
pubmed: 19891669
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007 Dec;30(10):978-84
pubmed: 18268436
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014 Jan;9(1):7-13
pubmed: 24982726
J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:758196
pubmed: 26483975
Surv Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;52 Suppl 2:S109-14
pubmed: 17998034
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;40(1):235-246
pubmed: 31578662
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Sep;84(9):909-14
pubmed: 17873777
J Glaucoma. 2012 Sep;21(7):486-9
pubmed: 21734593
Ophthalmology. 2005 Apr;112(4):599-602
pubmed: 15808250
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018 Sep - Oct;1(2):123-131
pubmed: 32672562
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):840-849.e2
pubmed: 22310080
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009 Jun;32(3):129-32; quiz 151
pubmed: 19233712
J Glaucoma. 2020 Mar;29(3):155-160
pubmed: 32108690
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Jan;15(1):47-59
pubmed: 29258404
Eye (Lond). 2020 Mar;34(3):584-590
pubmed: 31455900
Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Dec;85(12):1185-92
pubmed: 19050473
Acta Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;87(8):901-5
pubmed: 18937814

Auteurs

Agnieszka Jóźwik (A)

Department of Optics and Photonics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland.

Joanna Przeździecka-Dołyk (J)

Department of Optics and Photonics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland.
Department of Ophthalmology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland.

Ewa Wałek (E)

Department of Ophthalmology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland.

Magdalena Czerniak (M)

Department of Optics and Photonics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland.

Magdalena Asejczyk (M)

Department of Optics and Photonics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland.

Classifications MeSH