Meta-Analysis of Percutaneous Endomyocardial Cell Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Heart Failure by Combination of Individual Patient Data (IPD) of ACCRUE and Publication-Based Aggregate Data.
ACCRUE
cell-based regeneration therapy
human clinical trials
meta-analysis
percutaneous transendocardial cell delivery
stem cells
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Jun 2022
04 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
03
05
2022
revised:
31
05
2022
accepted:
01
06
2022
entrez:
10
6
2022
pubmed:
11
6
2022
medline:
11
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Individual patient data (IPD)-based meta-analysis (ACCRUE, meta-analysis of cell-based cardiac studies, NCT01098591) revealed an insufficient effect of intracoronary cell-based therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Patients with ischemic heart failure (iHF) have been treated with reparative cells using percutaneous endocardial, surgical, transvenous or intracoronary cell delivery methods, with variable effects in small randomized or cohort studies. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transendocardial cell therapy in patients with iHF. Two investigators extracted the data. Individual patient data (IPD) (n = 8 studies) and publication-based (n = 10 studies) aggregate data were combined for the meta-analysis, including patients (n = 1715) with chronic iHF. The data are reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality and changes in global ejection fraction. The secondary safety and efficacy endpoints were major adverse events, hospitalization and changes in end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. Post hoc analyses were performed using the IPD of eight studies to find predictive factors for treatment safety and efficacy. Cell therapy was significantly (p < 0.001) in favor of survival, major adverse events and hospitalization during follow-up. A forest plot analysis showed that cell therapy presents a significant benefit of increasing ejection fraction with a mean change of 2.51% (95% CI: 0.48; 4.54) between groups and of significantly decreasing end-systolic volume. The analysis of IPD data showed an improvement in the NYHA and CCS classes. Cell therapy significantly decreased the end-systolic volume in male patients; in patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension or hyperlipidemia; and in those with previous myocardial infarction and baseline ejection fraction ≤ 45%. The catheter-based transendocardial delivery of regenerative cells proved to be safe and effective for improving mortality and cardiac performance. The greatest benefit was observed in male patients with significant atherosclerotic co-morbidities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35683592
pii: jcm11113205
doi: 10.3390/jcm11113205
pmc: PMC9181462
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2011 Dec;11(12):1569-79
pubmed: 21981749
Am Heart J. 2011 Jun;161(6):1078-87.e3
pubmed: 21641354
Am Heart J. 2014 Jul;168(1):88-95.e2
pubmed: 24952864
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;112(2):217-25
pubmed: 23623290
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Mar;37(3):232-237
pubmed: 30778231
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Jan;19(1):138-147
pubmed: 27790824
Circ Res. 2016 Apr 15;118(8):1254-63
pubmed: 27081108
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 11;61(23):2329-38
pubmed: 23583246
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 May 17;8(7):393-404
pubmed: 21587214
Eur Heart J. 2017 Mar 01;38(9):648-660
pubmed: 28025189
Can J Cardiol. 2014 Nov;30(11):1370-7
pubmed: 24726092
Circ Res. 2015 Apr 10;116(8):1346-60
pubmed: 25700037
Pediatr Res. 2018 Jan;83(1-2):214-222
pubmed: 28972960
Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;23(4):661-674
pubmed: 33811444
Circ Res. 2015 Aug 28;117(6):576-84
pubmed: 26148930
Am Heart J. 2011 Oct;162(4):654-662.e1
pubmed: 21982657
Eur Heart J. 2015 Jul 14;36(27):1744-53
pubmed: 25926562
Atherosclerosis. 2014 Apr;233(2):485-492
pubmed: 24530783
Lancet. 2016 Jun 11;387(10036):2412-21
pubmed: 27059887
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jul;3(7):772-5
pubmed: 20633856
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan;2(1):9-16
pubmed: 19463392
Circulation. 2010 Feb 23;121(7):e46-e215
pubmed: 20019324
Eur Heart J. 2020 Oct 7;41(38):3702-3710
pubmed: 32860406
Heart Lung Circ. 2013 Nov;22(11):887-94
pubmed: 23806195
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019 May 31;10(1):150
pubmed: 31151406
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 14;70(20):2476-2486
pubmed: 29141781
J Card Fail. 2009 Mar;15(2):130-5
pubmed: 19254672
JAMA. 2012 Apr 25;307(16):1717-26
pubmed: 22447880
Circ Res. 2015 Apr 10;116(8):1361-77
pubmed: 25632038
Med Sci Monit. 2014 Oct 01;20:1768-77
pubmed: 25270584
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;8(3):2306-2309
pubmed: 33652498
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Oct;142(4):911-20
pubmed: 21376346
Circ Res. 2018 Jul 6;123(2):159-176
pubmed: 29976685
JAMA. 2014 Jan 1;311(1):62-73
pubmed: 24247587
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Aug;21(8):1032-1041
pubmed: 30790396
Herz. 2020 Sep;45(6):557-563
pubmed: 30341444
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012 Dec;12(12):1563-73
pubmed: 22953786
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2010 Apr;3(2):160-8
pubmed: 20560030
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928
pubmed: 22008217
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;(4):CD007888
pubmed: 24777540
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Feb 1;4(2):95-96
pubmed: 30480702
EuroIntervention. 2011 Feb;6(7):805-12
pubmed: 21252013
J Mol Neurosci. 2018 May;65(1):60-73
pubmed: 29705933
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 24;12:CD007888
pubmed: 28012165
Cureus. 2019 Sep 6;11(9):e5585
pubmed: 31696004
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2009 Jan;6(1):70-81
pubmed: 19002124