Angle of Uterine Flexion and Adenomyosis.
adenomyosis
chronic pelvic pain
dysmenorrhea
dyspareunia
retroverted uterus
transvaginal ultrasound
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Jun 2022
04 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
22
04
2022
revised:
21
05
2022
accepted:
02
06
2022
entrez:
10
6
2022
pubmed:
11
6
2022
medline:
11
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of adenomyosis in symptomatic women in relation to the angle of flexion of the uterus. A total of 120 patients referring to our Chronic Pelvic Pain Center were prospectively enrolled. Each woman scored menstrual pain, intermenstrual pain, and dyspareunia on a 10 cm visual analogue scale and underwent a clinical examination and transvaginal ultrasound. MUSA criteria were used for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. The angle of flexion of the uterus on the cervix was categorized as <150° (75% of cases), between 150° and 210° (6.7% of cases) and >210° (18.3% of cases). Adenomyosis was diagnosed in 76/120 women (63.3%). In women with adenomyosis, the VAS of intermenstrual pain was higher than in women without adenomyosis (4.04 ± 3.79 vs. 2.57 ± 3.34; p < 0.034). The angle of uterine flexion >210° was more prevalent in women with than without adenomyosis (25.0% vs. 6.8%; p < 0.015). The odds ratio of suffering from adenomyosis markedly increased in the presence of an angle of uterine flexion >210° (OR 5.8 95% CI 1.19, 28.3; p > 0.029). The data indicate that the ultrasound-estimated angle of uterine flexion >210° is related to a higher prevalence of adenomyosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35683601
pii: jcm11113214
doi: 10.3390/jcm11113214
pmc: PMC9181559
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Dec;94(12):1297-306
pubmed: 26399692
Fertil Steril. 2018 Mar;109(3):406-417
pubmed: 29566853
Radiographics. 2018 Sep-Oct;38(5):1576-1589
pubmed: 30207945
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;46(3):284-98
pubmed: 25652685
Minerva Ginecol. 2019 Jun;71(3):177-181
pubmed: 30486633
J Pain Res. 2012;5:169-74
pubmed: 22792003
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000 May;7(2):233-6
pubmed: 10806268
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;60(1):118-131
pubmed: 34587658
Fertil Steril. 2018 Oct;110(5):858
pubmed: 30316431
Fertil Steril. 2018 Mar;109(3):389-397
pubmed: 29566851
Radiology. 2005 Apr;235(1):124-31
pubmed: 15731368
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Apr;291(4):917-32
pubmed: 25241270
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Feb 1;23(2):164-85
pubmed: 26427702
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 07;10(5):
pubmed: 33799937
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Aug;127(2):252-6
pubmed: 16494992
Semin Reprod Med. 2020 May;38(2-03):129-143
pubmed: 33032339
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Aug;20(4):465-77
pubmed: 16563868
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jan;93(1):58-63
pubmed: 24116846
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):749-53
pubmed: 20955984
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Aug;47(4):326-8
pubmed: 17627690
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Dec;1034:338-55
pubmed: 15731324