Optical Property Stability of Light-Cured versus Precured CAD-CAM Composites.
Journal
International journal of dentistry
ISSN: 1687-8728
Titre abrégé: Int J Dent
Pays: Egypt
ID NLM: 101524183
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
18
03
2022
revised:
13
05
2022
accepted:
17
05
2022
entrez:
10
6
2022
pubmed:
11
6
2022
medline:
11
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the optical property changes after staining of precured (PC) and light-cured (LC) composites. Specimens were prepared using different LC composites (GrandioSO-Voco, Filtek Z350-3M/ESPE, Opallis-FGM, and Kalore-GC) and four PC blocks (Grandio Blocs-Voco, Lava Ultimate-3M ESPE, Brava Block-FGM, and Cerasmart-GC) from the same manufacturers ( The changes in each property were calculated (ΔGloss, ΔTranslucency, ΔFluorescency, Δ A higher reduction in fluorescence was observed for only one brand of block and was similar for the others. The two brands of light-cured materials showed less staining, while for the others, the staining was similar. The effects of staining vary according to the composite formulation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35685910
doi: 10.1155/2022/2011864
pmc: PMC9173916
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2011864Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 A. C. M. Andrade et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported by the authors.
Références
Biomaterials. 2002 Apr;23(8):1819-29
pubmed: 11950052
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jan;29:508-16
pubmed: 24219861
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 May 1;18(5):352-357
pubmed: 28512271
J Dent. 2011 Oct;39(10):700-6
pubmed: 21856367
J Dent Res. 2014 Dec;93(12):1232-4
pubmed: 25344335
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011 Apr;23(2):73-87
pubmed: 21477031
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002;14(3):158-66
pubmed: 12132570
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6
pubmed: 17635330
Dent Mater. 2012 May;28(5):529-34
pubmed: 22230107
J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Dec;28(12):1106-15
pubmed: 11874509
J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e2-16
pubmed: 20621154
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Mar 1;21(3):233-237
pubmed: 32434966
Oper Dent. 2007 Jul-Aug;32(4):406-11
pubmed: 17695615
Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013 Summer;8(2):200-12
pubmed: 23712341
Dent Mater J. 2021 Jan 31;40(1):94-100
pubmed: 32863375
Dent Mater. 2011 Oct;27(10):1003-10
pubmed: 21783239
Am J Dent. 2011 Aug;24(4):245-9
pubmed: 22016920
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jan;115(1):71-5
pubmed: 26386483
Braz Dent J. 2020 Sep 04;31(4):431-439
pubmed: 32901721
Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):289-293
pubmed: 32308292
J Dent. 2017 Apr;59:48-53
pubmed: 28212979
J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):831-8
pubmed: 24746713
Gen Dent. 2016 Sep-Oct;64(5):20-3
pubmed: 27599276
Braz Oral Res. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):369-75
pubmed: 21860925
Odontology. 2017 Apr;105(2):162-169
pubmed: 27456684
Int J Dent. 2017;2017:3483171
pubmed: 28611843
Eur J Dent. 2014 Apr;8(2):160-165
pubmed: 24966764
Dent Mater. 2009 Dec;25(12):1564-8
pubmed: 19709725
J Dent. 2005 May;33(5):389-98
pubmed: 15833394
Dent Mater. 2012 Jan;28(1):3-12
pubmed: 22119539
J Dent Res. 2010 Jul;89(7):657-65
pubmed: 20448246
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Apr;105(4):236-41
pubmed: 21458648
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2011 Dec;19(4):151-4
pubmed: 22645799
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Nov;31(6):627-638
pubmed: 31631500
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 May 1;22(5):557-561
pubmed: 34318777
Eur J Dent. 2009 Jan;3(1):50-6
pubmed: 19262731
Braz Dent J. 2019 Jan-Feb;30(1):52-57
pubmed: 30864648
J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 May-Jun;18(3):249-54
pubmed: 20857002
Oper Dent. 2005 Mar-Apr;30(2):213-9
pubmed: 15853107
Biomaterials. 2003 Feb;24(4):655-65
pubmed: 12437960
Am J Dent. 2009 Apr;22(2):102-10
pubmed: 19626974
Oper Dent. 2005 Jul-Aug;30(4):436-42
pubmed: 16130863
J Dent. 2008 Oct;36(10):840-6
pubmed: 18621459
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Feb 04;2019:5109481
pubmed: 30863779
Dent Mater J. 2012;31(5):879-84
pubmed: 23037854