Economic Evaluation of Nutrition-Sensitive Agricultural Interventions to Increase Maternal and Child Dietary Diversity and Nutritional Status in Rural Odisha, India.
Cost–consequence analysis
Dietary diversity
India
Maternal and child nutrition
Nutrition-sensitive agriculture
Participatory learning and action
Women's groups
Journal
The Journal of nutrition
ISSN: 1541-6100
Titre abrégé: J Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0404243
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 10 2022
06 10 2022
Historique:
received:
25
08
2021
revised:
01
11
2021
accepted:
04
06
2022
pubmed:
11
6
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
entrez:
10
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Economic evaluations of nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA) interventions are scarce, limiting assessment of their potential affordability and scalability. We conducted cost-consequence analyses of 3 participatory video-based interventions of fortnightly women's group meetings using the following platforms: 1) NSA videos; 2) NSA and nutrition-specific videos; or 3) NSA videos with a nutrition-specific participatory learning and action (PLA) cycle. Interventions were tested in a 32-mo, 4-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial, Upscaling Participatory Action and Videos for Agriculture and Nutrition (UPAVAN) in the Keonjhar district, Odisha, India. Impacts were evaluated in children aged 0-23 mo and their mothers. We estimated program costs using data collected prospectively from expenditure records of implementing and technical partners and societal costs using expenditure assessment data collected from households with a child aged 0-23 mo and key informant interviews. Costs were adjusted for inflation, discounted, and converted to 2019 US$. Total program costs of each intervention ranged from US$272,121 to US$386,907. Program costs per pregnant woman or mother of a child aged 0-23 mo were US$62 for NSA videos, US$84 for NSA and nutrition-specific videos, and US$78 for NSA videos with PLA (societal costs: US$125, US$143, and US$122, respectively). Substantial shares of total costs were attributable to development and delivery of the videos and PLA (52-69%) and quality assurance (25-41%). Relative to control, minimum dietary diversity was higher in the children who underwent the interventions incorporating nutrition-specific videos and PLA (adjusted RRs: 1.19 and 1.27; 95% CIs: 1.03-1.37 and 1.11, 1.46, respectively). Relative to control, minimum dietary diversity in mothers was higher in those who underwent NSA video (1.21 [1.01, 1.45]) and NSA with PLA (1.30 [1.10, 1.53]) interventions. NSA videos with PLA can increase both maternal and child dietary diversity and have the lowest cost per unit increase in diet diversity. Building on investments made in developing UPAVAN, cost-efficiency at scale could be increased with less intensive monitoring, reduced startup costs, and integration within existing government programs. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as ISRCTN65922679.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Economic evaluations of nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA) interventions are scarce, limiting assessment of their potential affordability and scalability.
OBJECTIVES
We conducted cost-consequence analyses of 3 participatory video-based interventions of fortnightly women's group meetings using the following platforms: 1) NSA videos; 2) NSA and nutrition-specific videos; or 3) NSA videos with a nutrition-specific participatory learning and action (PLA) cycle.
METHODS
Interventions were tested in a 32-mo, 4-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial, Upscaling Participatory Action and Videos for Agriculture and Nutrition (UPAVAN) in the Keonjhar district, Odisha, India. Impacts were evaluated in children aged 0-23 mo and their mothers. We estimated program costs using data collected prospectively from expenditure records of implementing and technical partners and societal costs using expenditure assessment data collected from households with a child aged 0-23 mo and key informant interviews. Costs were adjusted for inflation, discounted, and converted to 2019 US$.
RESULTS
Total program costs of each intervention ranged from US$272,121 to US$386,907. Program costs per pregnant woman or mother of a child aged 0-23 mo were US$62 for NSA videos, US$84 for NSA and nutrition-specific videos, and US$78 for NSA videos with PLA (societal costs: US$125, US$143, and US$122, respectively). Substantial shares of total costs were attributable to development and delivery of the videos and PLA (52-69%) and quality assurance (25-41%). Relative to control, minimum dietary diversity was higher in the children who underwent the interventions incorporating nutrition-specific videos and PLA (adjusted RRs: 1.19 and 1.27; 95% CIs: 1.03-1.37 and 1.11, 1.46, respectively). Relative to control, minimum dietary diversity in mothers was higher in those who underwent NSA video (1.21 [1.01, 1.45]) and NSA with PLA (1.30 [1.10, 1.53]) interventions.
CONCLUSION
NSA videos with PLA can increase both maternal and child dietary diversity and have the lowest cost per unit increase in diet diversity. Building on investments made in developing UPAVAN, cost-efficiency at scale could be increased with less intensive monitoring, reduced startup costs, and integration within existing government programs. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as ISRCTN65922679.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35687367
pii: S0022-3166(23)08602-9
doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac132
pmc: PMC9535442
doi:
pii:
Substances chimiques
Polyesters
0
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN65922679']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2255-2268Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.
Références
Lancet. 2013 Aug 10;382(9891):536-51
pubmed: 23746780
Trials. 2018 Mar 9;19(1):176
pubmed: 29523173
Food Nutr Bull. 2021 Mar;42(1):3-22
pubmed: 33878905
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 May;5(5):e263-e276
pubmed: 33811818
Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):452-477
pubmed: 23746776
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0160986
pubmed: 27536781
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11):
pubmed: 34732513
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 18;19(1):961
pubmed: 31319837
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Nov;23(6):408-27
pubmed: 18755734
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50
pubmed: 23538175
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Oct;5(10):e1004-e1016
pubmed: 28911749
J Nutr. 2020 Feb 1;150(2):350-355
pubmed: 31616933
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Nov 1;34(9):646-655
pubmed: 31504504
Nutr Rev. 2012 Dec;70(12):693-708
pubmed: 23206283
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2003 Feb 26;1(1):1
pubmed: 12773220
Glob Food Sec. 2021 Jun;29:100550
pubmed: 34164258
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2014 Apr 30;12:11
pubmed: 24834014
Matern Child Nutr. 2016 May;12 Suppl 1:169-85
pubmed: 27187914
J Nutr. 2018 Oct 1;148(10):1587-1597
pubmed: 30204916
Health Policy Plan. 2001 Mar;16(1):113-21
pubmed: 11238438
Health Policy Plan. 2005 Jul;20(4):252-9
pubmed: 15965037
Food Secur. 2022;14(1):67-80
pubmed: 35222745
Food Nutr Bull. 2019 Sep;40(3):393-408
pubmed: 31204503
Am J Agric Econ. 2018;100(3):906-930
pubmed: 32139914
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 04;11(1):e0145043
pubmed: 26727369
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Jun;56:11-22
pubmed: 27003730
Matern Child Nutr. 2016 May;12 Suppl 1:249-52
pubmed: 27187922
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Apr 3;5:62
pubmed: 33102783
Trials. 2019 May 27;20(1):287
pubmed: 31133067
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 13;9(3):e91781
pubmed: 24626285
Health Policy Plan. 2021 May 17;36(4):533-541
pubmed: 33280036
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 14;15:550
pubmed: 26652014
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6):
pubmed: 32513863